Methodology - 'Manhaj' Refutations Tamyee'

[2] Reminder: Masjid Al-Huda (Bolton) and @ Al-Markazus Salafi- Inform [the ill-informed, erratic one] that Naveed Ayaz Promotes Suhaib Hasan

See Here [Naveed Promotes Suhaib Hasan]


A brief insight into Suhaib Hasan’s affair

Shaykh Muhammad al-Madkhalee said regarding Suhayb Hasan (in a cassette recording) – after saying that the issue of his attacks and slanders against the scholars – that it is between Shaykh Suhaib and Allaah:

Then what we have seen and have noticed from Shaykh Suhaib is that he is sympathetic and affectionate towards Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen – he wants that he should deny that – a matter that we saw ourselves. In the summer that has past when I came to you and took part in the conferences which you held here in Birmingham. Some [written] questions came forward which were asking about the jamaa’ah of Ikhwaan and other jamaa’ahs of hizbiyyah and these questions would be passed on to Shaykh Suhaib and he would conceal and hide them – he did not desire to read them to me – and they were directed to me, asking about Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen and about specific individuals and jamaa’aat. And if it was not for the Brother al-Anjaraee – whom Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic) had placed there – and he was next to us and he knows the English language well – I would not have known that because the questions were written in the English language. And Shaykh Suhaib was disturbed that he should read them out because the Brother al-Anjaree requested that from him – or he himself informed me, that Shaykh Suhaib is doing that – so Shaykh Suhaib was disturbed and unsettled that he should read them – reluctant and unpleased that he should read them. This is the first thing. As for the second then Shaykh Suhaib – from what has reached us – it has not reached us in such and such a way – but rather it has reached is in written form – something acknowledged officially, and if these words are a lie against him then let him [Shaykh Suhaib] publicise his freedom from it. So in Britain a conference was held in the month of Shabaan from the 11th to the 13th in the year 1417 from Saturday to Monday – by the Muslim Students Society (MSS) of the United Kingdom and Eire. And it was the 35th conference – and this is a pure and unadulterated Ikhwaani conference – and the one who knows the nature of this jam’iyyah knows this. And Suhaib Hasan was invited to it and his name is amongst the names of those who were present in this gathering. And this sheet of paper [poster] is a means of publicity for it which has been distributed and listen to those who have been invited to this conference: Faisal Mawlawi, Raashid al-Ghanouchi, Saleem al-Husanee or al-Husnee, Isaam al-Basheer, Ibraaheem as-Sanoussi, Fahmi Huwaidiand the Ikhwaan suspect Fahmi Huwaidi of being a secularist! So how can they unite with him let alone that Shaykh Suhaib enters [the conference] thinking that he is a Salafi – Kamaal al-Hilbaawi, Munir Ahmad, Hasan Yoosuf, Hasan Huwaidi, Ahmad ash-Shaykh, Suhaib Hasan, Ahmad Mansoor, Usaamah at-Takreeti and others. And all of them are doctors as there is a prefix before each of their names so they indicate: The Ustaadh and Doctor Saleem al-Husanee, or al-Husnee, Doctor Issaam al-Basheer, Doctor Ibraaheem as-Sanoussi, Ustaadh Fahmi Huwaidi, Doctor Kamal al-Hilbawi, Doctor Munir Ahmad, Ustaadh Hasan Yoosfuf, Doctor Hasan Huwaidi, Shaykh Ahmad ash-Shaykh from Somalia, Shaykh Suhaib Hasan, the Ustaadh and Doctor Ahmad Mansoor, Usaamah al-Takreeti and others. So they are a group of people from Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen. Rather there are some amongst them whom the Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen consider to be amongst their enemies such as Fahmi Huwaidi. So how can this man [Suhaib Hasan] come together with them. Then it reached me that he did not attend because he became ill or went to the hospital. I say that it is binding upon him – as he has been gathered in the ranks of those and it is not possible that his name is mentioned [in the list of those who have been invited] except with [his] pleasure. And if this had been written [without his consent] then it is necessary for him to bring out and to publicise his freedom and innocence from this gathering and from taking part in this gathering. End of his words.

[ source:  ]