Month: August 2013

[1] Updated: Abu Eesa Niamatullah– A slanderous devil and affiliate of Al-Maghrib Institute

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Abu Eesa Niamatullah [a slanderous devil] at Al-Maghrib institute attacks Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee (may Allaah protect him from the envious affiliates of the people of Bidah).

Firstly:

Imaam Ibnul Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said:

”And from the characteristics of the hypocrites is that they conceal the truth and are deceptive towards its people and accuse them with their diseases.  They accuse them when they enjoin good, forbid evil and call to Allaah and His Messenger.  That is because they (the hypocrites) are people of trials and are mischief makers in the earth.  And Allaah has made known to His Messenger and the believers that they (the hypocrites) are mischief makers in the earth.  And when the inheritors of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) call them to the Book of Allaah and to the Sunnah of His Messenger, particularly to that which is unadulterated, they accuse them of innovation and misguidance.   And when they see them being ones who abstain from the dunyah, having a fervent desire for the afterlife and traversing the path of obedience to Allaah and His Messenger, they accuse them of falsehood and deception. And when they see them with the truth, they mix it with falsehood and give that out to those of weak intellect–turning it into something repugnant in order to make them flee from it.  And if they (the hypocrites) have with them falsehood, they disguise it with the garment of truth and give it out-turning it into something that would be accepted from them. [Source: Tareequl Hijratayn (503)]

Indeed, the slanderous statements of Niamatullah [an affiliate of Al-Maghrib Institute] are based on nothing else but hatred for that which Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon propagate against their figureheads and organizations of bidah and misguidance. So he unleashes his vile tongue against Shaikh Rabee and the Salafiyyoon—a behaviour similar to that of the hypocrites.  Obviously we do not mean that he is a hypocrite in belief; rather this behaviour of his is similar to that of the hypocrites, as Imaam Ibnul Qayyim said: ‘’And when they (i.e. hypocrites)  see them (i.e. the people of truth) with the truth, they mix it with falsehood and give that out to those of weak intellect–turning it into something repugnant in order to make them flee from it.  And if they (the hypocrites) have with them falsehood, they disguise it with the garment of truth and give it out-turning it into something that would be accepted from them.’’

Secondly:

This slanderous devil has the audacity to describe Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon as fake salafis who have been exposed by the fitnah;  — what is the fitnah intended by this slanderer and why did he use the word Madkhalees?! Indeed, the only people known to use this word in their attacks are the people of hizbiyyah and bidah–those who habour great hatred and enmity towards Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah protect him from the lies and enmity of this slanderous devil) because he exposes their corrupt views, deviated organizations and figureheads of bidah .  This is what angers the likes of this slanderer and others similar to him.  They hate Shaikh Rabee and refer to those who transmit his refutations as Madkhalees.  However, this slanderous devil revealed his true state of affairs after signing the pledge of mutual co-operation with some of the representatives of the sects of Major Shirk and Bidah.  Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said: ‘’And Imaan is known about a man, just as all the states of his heart are known by way of his (outward) allegiances, enmities, his rejoicing, anger, hunger, thirst, and other such affairs. For these matters have certain outward binding necessities (lawaazim dhaahirah) and the outward matters necessitate inward matters. And this is a matter known, the people know this concerning the one that they have experienced and tested (jarraboohu wamtahinoohu)… [minhaaj-as-sunnah 8/475] [Translation: Salafipublications.com]

Indeed one of the Salaf said: “The one who is silent about the truth is a silent devil, while the one who speaks falsehood is a speaking devil.” [Quoted in Ad-Durar as-Saniyyah’; 8/75-79]

Abu Eesa is a speaking devil whose hatred is directed at one of the major scholars of this era; rather a scholar with recommendations from the Imaams of Ahlus Sunnah in this era, such as the likes of Imaam Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah), Imaam Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) and Imam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah).  This slanderous devil has no proof to justify his statements, rather he is just another loud mouthed devil who wishes that Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon should not expose the institutions and  figureheads of bidah he is affiliated with.  May Allaah guide him or protect us from the manifest falsehood he is upon.

[1]Bursting The Madkhali Myth

Visit http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/categories/shaykh-rabee.cfm

[2] Al-Allaamah Rabee’s Relationship with the scholars and their praises for him–even though Abu Eesa and his affiliates amongst the slanderous devils increase in hatred

http://salaficentre.com/2012/05/the-hizbiyyoon-hate-to-hear-this-being-mentioned-about-shaikh-rabee-may-allaah-protect-him/

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/hyulz-the-relationship-between-shaykh-rabee-al-madkhali-and-the-major-scholars-part-1.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/bqouy-the-relationship-between-shaykh-rabee-al-madkhali-and-the-major-scholars-part-2.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/epluy-shaykh-ibn-uthaymin-the-people-began-to-tarnish-shaykh-rabee-with-faults-after-he-spoke-about-some-of-their-symbolic-figureheads.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/ebhen-shaykh-ibn-uthaymin-on-shaykh-rabi-al-madkhali.cfm

To be continued Inshaa-Allaah

Email Shaykh–Opportunist bully feared exposure of his inadequacy and incompetence!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful The Bestower of Mercy

As it is well known to the Salafiyyoon that when the filthy houthi rawaafid of Yemen attacked Dammaaj, the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah [Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi, Shaikh Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri and others] called for assistance. Likewise, the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah supplicated for Dammaaj and collected funds to aid the oppressed.

After the fitnah of the Rawaafid eased a little, Al-Allaamah Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) had several conversations with Yahyah Al-Haddaadi and there was a period of silence about Yahyaa. However, we at the Salafi Centre did not change our position towards Yahyah Al-Haddaadi and this was due to two reasons: firstly, Shaikh Rabee and the rest of the Ulama were silent, so we followed our scholars in their silence. Secondly, none of them made it clear that yahyah al-Haddaadi had recanted from his grave errors, so we also maintained the same stance.

However, Email Shaykh [opportunist bully] decided to start a new campaign of harassment- sending emails and demanding that we come in line with Shaikh Rabee’s and Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi’s position because he realised that we were not rushing to declare Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi to be upon clarity. Indeed our stance was solely based on the fact that neither did the scholars state that his affair was sound nor that he has recanted from his errors.

However, after the Email Shaykh made several attempts and failed to force us to take his position [i.e. to have a positive view of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi], we  asked him to complain to Shaikh Rabee about us -that we were still refusing to be in line with Shaikh Rabee and Shaikh Muhammad concerning the affair of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi.  This enraged the Email Shaykh, so he once again fell victim to his usual knee jerk reactions, saying: ‘’Look my brother, I tell you frankly, you are a twister. Yes is only when it suits you, Shaikh Rabee.’’

Reader, look at this behaviour! The opportunist bully really feared exposure of his inadequacy and incompetence. Firstly, he tried to force us to take a position based on nothing, whilst knowing that there was no evidence to suggest that his Haddaadi Shaikh had recanted from his innovations, but on the other hand he was too terrified to phone the scholars and complain to them about us. Secondly, Shaikh Rabee finally spoke and revealed the circumstances behind his period of silence concerning Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi.  Examine the following:

Student of Damaaj: “O’ Shaykh all that we have heard from you is praise for him. You called him and praised him…”Shaykh Rabee ibn Hadee al-Madkhalee: “By Allaah! Listen to me, by Allaah, I did not say this except that he claimed to have abandoned everything that he said and in order to bring him closer to us, and cause him to become gentle. But all we witnessed up until today are lies, deception and extremism. By Allaah, you see the extremism of the students there. There are no manners with them whatsoever. Go back and tell them this from me. [For further details see link: http://salaficentre.com/2013/05/shaykh-rabee-we-have-remained-patient-for-7-years-with-yahya-al-hajoori/

So this was the reason behind Shaikh Rabee’s silence and it is expected. We all know that the Shaikh (may Allaah preserve him) is well-known for exercising great patience with those who err. We all know that he advised the two Ikhwaani innovators Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq and Al-Maribi for many years before refuting them.  Likewise, he exercised patience with Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi for many years.

As for the Email Shaykh, he sought to force and bully us into taking a false position, whilst Shaikh Rabee—who at that time employed softness to aid Al-Hajoori recant from his errors—was not forcing any of the Maraakiz in the West to declare Al-Hajoori free from those grave errors.  However at present the Shaikh (may Allaah prolong his life upon goodness) has made his stance very clear against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi after advising him.

Some statements of the Shaikh against Yahyaa Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi 

*He (Al-Hajoori) is a haddaadi carrying great danger against the Salafi Dawah.

*He (Al-Hajoori) is from the most harmful (people) towards Salafi dawah and that there is none more harmful than yahyah.

*Refute Al-Hajooree and clarify his state of affairs to the Muslims. Do not keep quiet about him.
*The companions of Shaikh Yahyah are people of Fitan….

*His students are ghulaat (extremists)..

[Source: See PDF: Al-Mukhtasar Fee Bayaani ba’di Mukhaalafaat Yahyaa Al-Hajoori Limaa alayhi Ahlul hadeeth wal athar: page 91-92]

We ask Allaah for truthfulness–the Email Shaykh still choses to curse those who transmit the statements of the scholars against Al-Hajoori; rather he fabricate lies against Al-Markaz As-Salafi- [i.e. Takfeeri performs Ruqya in Salafi masjid for £50, and he even appeals to witnesses to confirm his lies]—all in support of a Mubtadi.  Inshaa-Allaah there is a bit more to learn about this opportunist bully before his name is revealed Inshaa-Allaah.

We ask Allaah to guide him and his Shaikh or protect us from their obstinacy and falsehood.

To be continued…..Inshaa-Allaah

Email Shaykh’s Tongue afflicted with chronic disease of unjustified cursing!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of MercyEmail

Email Shaykh [Murad’ Al-Jazaa’iri] has still not repented from lies -[Ruqya in Salafi Masjid for £50- http://www.salaficentre.com/2013/08/email-shaykh-the-end-to-delusions-and-lying-has-finally-come/%5D- however he prefers to carry on cursing.

On 23/08/2013 once again Email Shaykh fell victim to his usual knee jerk reaction and unleashes a curse,  saying: ‘’May Allaah Almighty curse the liars and expose the hypocrite double standard.’’  Why all this evil desires, unjustified cursing, irrationality and idiocy in defence of Al-Hajoori, Al-Haddaadi, Al-Mubtadi?!  Email Shaykh curses without thinking, just as he did with the Ruqya for £50 affair.  He has not repented for this shameless lie, yet he still prefers to curse. This is exactly the same behaviour of his Haddaadi Shaikh, because despite his lies, innovations, foul speech and quackery, he said”Whoever says that the Dawah in Dammaaj has changed, then upon him is the curse of Allaah, the angels and all the people.” [Quoted in Al-Qawl Al-Jaliyy Libayaani Maa Ghayyarahu Al-Hajoori Min Da-wati Imaam Al-Waadi-ee: PDF page: 1]

We seek Allaah’s protection from following evil desires.

Latest Posts at Manhaj.com [may Allaah preserve the authors]

Yahyaa-Hajuri al-Haddaadi and Followers Firing Arrows Whilst Sinking in the Quicksand: The Issue of Istighaathah Revisted

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/ipybg-the-ghuluww-towards-yahyaa-al-haddaadi-part-11.cfm

 

Also see: 100 Observations against Al Hajoori – Point 13

http://ah-sp.com/2013/07/04/100-observations-against-al-hajoori-point-13/

Reminder:

http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/clarification-and-description-to-help-identify-extreme-hajoori-fanatic-in-manchester/

 

The Salafi Masjid & Islamic Centre (Wright Street–Birmingham)

What is The Call of The Salafis?

Since the early 90’s a group of Muslims who follow the Qur’aan and the Sunnah upon the understanding of the disciples of the Prophet (may the salutations of peace of Allaah be upon him) have been striving to convey the fundamental teachings of Islaam in the UK and the West….[visit link for more detail http://www.wrightstreetmosque.com/


 

A bit more detail needed on this post – “What Yusuf (alayhis-salaam) possessed of knowledge and Imaan”

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

”He (Yusuf) knew that he is not able to avert it on his own, and that if his Lord did not protect him and avert their (i.e. the women) plot, he would have inclined towards them by way of (human) nature and thus become of the ignorant ones.  This is from Yusuf’s perfect knowledge about his Lord and himself (as a human being). [Updated: Sharh Al-Asbaab Wal-Amaal Alatee Yudaa-afu Bihaa Ath-Thawaab of Imaam as-Saa’di page: 58:see link: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=29&Topic=9966: Post Number 6]

Additional Detail for more clarity

Concerning the Aayaat 23 and 24 Soorah Yusuf:

‘’And she, in whose house he was, sought to seduce him (to do an evil act), she closed the doors and said: “Come on, O you.” He said: “I seek refuge in Allah (or Allah forbid)! Truly, he (your husband) is my master! He made my stay agreeable! (So I will never betray him). Verily, the Zalimun (wrong and evil-doers) will never be successful.” [Ayah: 23]

‘’And indeed she did desire him and he would have inclined to her desire, had he not seen the evidence of his Lord. Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.’’[Ayah:24]

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) said about the part of the verse: ‘’Had he not seen the evidence of his Lord;’’ That is what he possessed of knowledge and Eemaan which necessitates abandonment of everything that Allaah has forbidden—and which necessitated that he would distance himself and abstain from this major sin, and he (Yusuf) said: “I seek refuge in Allah (or Allah forbid)! That is: I seek refuge with Allaah that I should (ever) commit this ugly deed, because it is from that which angers Allaah….

Concerning the Ayah:

‘’Unless You turn away their plot from me, I will feel inclined towards them and be one (of those who commit sin and deserve blame or those who do deeds) of the ignorants.’’ [Noble Qur’aan- Shaikh Taqiyudeen Al-Hilaali and Dr Muhsin khan. Soorah Yoosuf Ayah: 33]

Imaam Ibn Katheer (rahimahullaah) said:

‘’If You abandon me and I am reliant on myself, then I have no power over myself, nor can I bring harm or benefit to myself, except with Your power and will. Verily, You are sought for each and everything, and our total reliance is on You Alone for each and everything. Please, do not abandon me and leave me to rely on myself.’’ [Tafseer Ibn katheer]

Conclusion:

So, Yusuf (alayhis-salaam) relied upon Allaah and acknowledged the absolute Power and Might of his Lord in repelling harm and bringing benefit, and that he cannot repel harm or bring benefit except by the Might and Power of his Lord.  And his knowledge and awareness of Allaah, and Imaan in Allaah necessitated that he greatly abhorred the evil deed he was been called to, and he was definitely going to turn away from it by the will of Allaah (The Most High).  Thus Imaam as-Saa’di said: ‘’That is what he (Yusuf) possessed of knowledge and Eemaan which necessitates abandonment of everything that Allaah has forbidden—and which necessitated that he would distance himself and abstain from this major sin…’’

Al Aqeedah Waasitiyyah – Ibn Taymiyyah – Abu Muaadh Taqweem Aslam

Sharh Al-Aqeedat-il-Wasitiyah of Shaykh-al Islam Ibn Taymiyyah

With the core explanation of Shaykh Abdul Azeez Rashid (with supporting material of Shaykh Fawzaan, Shaykh Uthaymeen).

LIVE LESSON By Abu Muadh Taqweem Aslam

Saturday 7:30pm

Both Men’s and Women’s side open.

The lesson will be broadcast on Paltalk or you can listen via our website

Download Previous Lessons Here

The Correct stance Towards the differing of the scholars concerning Jarh and Tadeel- By Al-Allaamah Ubayd Al-Jaabiri

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Question:

This questioner says: What is the obligation upon the common Salafis concerning those du’aat (callers) about whom the scholars differ in their commendations and criticisms, regardless whether they (i.e. the common Salafis) are aware or unaware of their mistakes (i.e. the mistakes of those callers)?

Answer:

I say: I advise you; neither accept cassettes nor books except those of a person whom you know to be upon the Sunnah and a witness of that is established for him—the one well-known to be upon the Sunnah and an opposition to it is not manifested from him. This is an (abiding) general principle applied to him whilst he is alive and after his death.  The one who passed away and we regarded him to be upon the Sunnah, then in our view he is upon the Sunnah and we ask Allaah to keep him firm upon it in the afterlife [i.e. Allaah grants him firmness to answer the questions in the grave due to adherence to the Sunnah (Tawheed and following the Messenger) and resurrects him in the afterlife as a person of Sunnah] just as he was kept firm upon it whilst he was alive…aameen. This is the first affair.

Secondly: If the affair of a person is hidden from you–the one whose books and cassettes are famous and his fame is widespread–then ask those who are well acquainted with him and those who know about his state of affairs.  That is because neither is the Sunnah hidden nor are its people. A man’s Tazkiyah (i.e. the clear witness that he is upright upon the Sunnah) are his own actions. His Tazkiyah are his own actions that he is upon the Sunnah. It is the witness and the people mention him with it during his life and after his death.

There is none who hides behind the Sunnah– the people beguiled by him, gathered around him to learn, adhered to him, became dependent on him and accepted everything he said–except that Allaah will reveal his affair, uncover and expose his concealed state of affairs to specific individuals and to the general public, regarding what was hidden and apparent of his deception, his mixing truth with falsehood, his plots and deceitful practices.  Allaah facilitates men of virtue, intelligence, wisdom, strength and exceptional natural ability–possessors of knowledge, skill and sound understanding of the religion–through whom He (Allaah) unveils the affair of that trickster, dubious and deceitful person.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon you that when the state of that person is made clear–the one whose fame is widespread etc.–then you should be cautious of him as long as he was warned against by those people of knowledge and Imaan who are upon the Sunnah; for indeed they will unveil his affair with evidences.  And there is no hindrance in unveiling the state of that person who has been warned against by a scholar or scholars with the appropriate etiquettes and in a good manner because that scholar will say to you: “I saw this and that in him, and I saw this and that in the book of such and such, or I heard this or that in the cassette of such and such.” Therefore, you have clear evidence that will unveil what was hidden from you, and that the one whose fame is widespread and his speech is pleasant is one who hides something of innovation and plotting, which cannot be compared to what he manifests from the Sunnah.

Secondly: The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow).

The Shaikh also said: A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only a human; he can be distracted and forgetful; he can be deceived by evil people; or he used to consider that man to be trustworthy–who has now been declared untrustworthy–and he deceives him. The witnesses to this affair are many, because many of those whose status has been dropped– due to been declared unreliable based on evidence–are in reality people who wage war against the Sunnah and its people.  So they come along with copies of their books and read it to the distinguished scholars–those whom virtue and leadership is witnessed for them in the religion–and the affair of this trickster and plotter is hidden from that noble scholar, which had he known about it the status of this person would have dropped in his eyes.

So this scholar gives praise based on what he heard. And if the book (of this trickster) is printed, it is disseminated and transmitted by his supporters and they spread a good reputation about him. Thus there are those who argue saying, “such and such praised him–Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) praised this book. However these scholars are excused; rather this trickster was hidden from that scholar.

So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this [deceiver, trickster, intrigant and plotter] from his books.  We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books, and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech.’’ Therefore, it is obligatory on you to be fair, and to be free from that wild and zealous attachment; and to be free from desires that blind a person. It is obligatory upon you that your search should be for the truth. [An Excerpt. Paraphrased]

Arabic Text:


الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.
أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.

فضيلة الشيخ عبيد بن عبد الله الجابري – حفظه الله –
************************************************** *

الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.

أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.

الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.

الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.