Womens-Arabic-Banner

[1]Greenlane’s Admin—[Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah; Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah & Allies of Naveed Ayaz [IslamNelson/Madeenah.con)]

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said:

”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] state on their website as follows: ”GLMCC is committed in providing a service to the community in accordance to the teachings and strict adherence to the Quran and authentic Sunnah with the understanding of the Khulafa Rashideen and Salaf-us-Salih.” [End of Quote]

A Reminder before we briefly shed light on this blatant lie and destructive Plot Against the Pure Salafi Manhaj

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) stated in Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah [the 120th Mas-alah] They (People of the Pre-Islamic era of ignorance) claimed to follow the Salaf (righteous predecessors), while they clearly opposed and contradicted them.”  Shaikh Saaleh al Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

The general (people) among the Jews and the Christians, and the people of misguidance among those who attribute themselves to Islaam claim to follow those believers who preceded them. So the Jews claim that they follow Moosaa (alyahis-salaam) and those who believed in him; the Christians claim that they follow the Messiah (alayhis-salaam) and those who believed in him, and the people of misguidance of this Ummah claim that they follow the Salaf of this Ummah- the Sahaabah, the Taa’bi’een and their followers- and that what they are upon is the way of the Salaf.

It is not that the claim of everyone who claims to be upon the Madhab of the Salaf or upon the methodology of the Salaf is a sound claim, until he makes apparent what he is upon (regarding the) Methodology of the Salaf. So if that conforms to (the Methodology of the Salaf), then he is upon the Methodology of the Salaf; and if it is in opposition, then he is not upon the Methodology of the Salaf, even if he makes that claim.

Every deviated party at present claims to be upon the way of the Salaf, but they are not upon the methodology of the Salaf because the statement of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) regarding the precise (definition) of the way of the Salaf: ‘those upon that which I and my companions are upon’, is not applicable to them.  This is what it (means) to be upon the methodology of the Salaf. As for the one who is in opposition to this, then he is not upon the methodology of the Salaf, even if he claims that.   The Claim is not what is taken into consideration; rather the reality is what is taken into consideration.  Those who claim Salafiyyah are many, but they must make apparent what they are upon (with regards to the) Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh. If that is in conformity, then it is truth, and if in opposition, they are not upon the Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh.   Likewise, there are those who attribute themselves to the Madhabs of the Four Imaams, whilst being in opposition to the Imaams in Aqeedah; so their ascription is not correct because they oppose (the Imaams) in the most important of affairs and that is Aqeedah. [1] [End of Quote]

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] claims to be establishing the understanding of the Khulafaa and the Salaf; but the reality is that the Khulafaa and the Salaf neither worked with the people of Bidah nor sheltered those who openly defend figureheads of Bidah. This Admin is an open ally of Ihya Turaath (an organization of Bidah, whose speakers propagate various deviant methodologies]; Al-Maghrib Institute, whose deviation is clear to all the Salafiyyoon-Scholars, students of knowledge and the rest of the Salafiyyoon.

Likewise, this Admin is still sheltering Goldie [Abu Usaamah (the man of bidah)], who is well known to defend three contemporary figureheads of bidah and misguidance [Ali Halabi, Abul Hasan Al-Maribi and Muhammad Al-Maghraawi]. Therefore, is it from the Methodology of  the Khulafaa and the Salaf to co-operate with the people of Bidah or shelter those who defend them! Far removed is the Methodology of the Salaf from this satanic and destructive methodology. Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said: ”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”  [2]

Ihyaa Turaath: 

See link http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220&srow=21&erow=40

Ali Halabi:

See Links

http://salafitalk.net/st/viewtopics.cfm?Forum=33

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/categories/kp-the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi.cfm

Abul Hasan Al-Maribi:

See Link

Verdicts of the scholars against Abul Hasan Al-Maribi Al-Mubtadi [An Ally of Masjid As-Sunnah]

Muhammad Al-Maghraawi:

See Article: Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi [Salafipublications.com]

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

Abu Usaamah:

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

 

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

—————————————————————————————————————————————

[1] Abridged and slightly paraphrased..see Sharh- Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah of Sheikh Fawzaan (Page: 295-296)]

[2]Taareekh Dimashq (6/263)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Location

Telephone

0161 317 1481

Address

2 Dudley Street
Cheetham Hill
Manchester
M8 9DA

(C) 2012 The Salafi Centre of Manchester | 2 Dudley Street, Cheetham Hill, Manchester, M8 9DA
The Quran and Sunnah Upon The Understanding of The Salaf

Pin It on Pinterest