In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Muhammad Al-Maaliki continued his ranting and raving, whilst deliberately diverting his listeners from the main subject matter [i.e. the dispute between the criticizers at Al-Markazus Salafi and Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin was due to the three contemporary figureheads of Bidah (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi)]. This is the same stratagem usually employed by his close companion Goldie (Abu Usaamah) in order to deceive the listeners, satisfy their Tamyee cravings and shield their guilty allies.
This desperate attempt at concealing the real state of affairs constantly leads Muhammad Al-Maaliki and Goldie to make desperate attempts to hide the truth by deliberately diverting from the main subject matter; adopting Baatil by way of slander; abandoning truth by deliberately refusing to adopt the clear-unambiguous knowledge based refutations of the scholars against the Mubtadia’ah (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi) and those amongst their obstinate followers warned against by the Scholars; and mixing Haqq with Baatil by making a statement of truth, but intending deceit by way of it. This last blameworthy affair (i.e. mixing haqq with baatil) is what we’ll address briefly.
Muhammad Al-Maaliki claimed that we (i.e. the ones who transmitted the refutations of the scholars at Al-Markazus Salafi against Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin) turn our faces away from a Muslim when he gives salaam, but we would say to a kaafir, ‘’Hi John.’’
Firstly: This statement of Muhammad Al-Maaliki is nothing else but mixing Haqq with Baatil, and a slander disguised in buffoonery! He produced no evidence to support his claims; rather it is yet another emotional rhetoric aimed at defaming the Salafiyyoon at Al-Markazus Salafi and to aid the staunch followers of the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi).
Secondly: There is no doubt that a man of Sunnah will not give Salaam to a person against whom the verdict of Mubtadi is established with clear proofs, even if such a Mubtadi is still within the fold of Islaam. And likewise a man of Sunnah will not entertain those specific individuals about whom the Ulama have advised that they are to be boycotted due to the deadly Shubuhaat they spread. Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari (may Allaah preserve him) stated:
‘’Some of the aims behind boycotting innovators and the people of falsehood: [A] Actualization of servitude to Allaah: Boycotting is an act of worship and an affair of the Sharee-ah, which must be carried out for the sake of Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic) and in accordance with the guidance of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). [B] Enjoining good and forbidding evil. [C] Actualization of Walaa Wal Baraa (love and hate for the sake of Allaah). The other affairs that follow on from the above aims are: Restraining the innovator and his innovation and protecting the society from him. Preserving the Sharee-ah, so that what is not part of it is prevented from entering into it in the name of the Religion. 
Thirdly: Let us see how some of the Kibaarul Ulama of this era dealt with some of the obstinate innovators and people of falsehood. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) boycotted Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi-the one you (Muhammad Al-Maalik) praised in your lines poetry. [ See your own lines of poetry for the vile Haddaadi Mubtadi http://salaficentre.com/2014/05/1-%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A9-foolishness-praise-from-pseudo-shaikh-muhammad-al-maliki-to-al-hajoori-al-haddaai-al-mubtadi/ ]
Indeed, Yahyah Al-Hajoori Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi is a Muslim, so why did Shaikh Rabee refuse to meet him?! Are you [Muhammad Al-Maaliki] going to unleash your tongue against the Salafiyyoon for establishing the sound Walaa Wal Baraa towards the obstinate Mubtadi’ah, such as the likes of Al-Hajoori, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi, and their obstinate followers?! [see here: http://www.alhajuri.com/articles/qsikmob-shaykh-of-the-hajaawirah-yahya-al-hajuri-rejected-in-makkah.cfm ]
On the other hand, where is your proof that we turn our faces away from other Muslims other than those whom the Ulama have advised that they are to be boycotted?!
Likewise, look at how Al-Allaamah Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Banna (rahimahullaah) treated the obstinate Ikhwaani, Siyaasi Mubtadi Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq. See here: http://safeshare.tv/w/YhncROAlWw
Therefore, O Muhammad Al-Maalik! We do not entertain Mubtadi’ah and those particular individuals about whom our scholars have advised that they are to be boycotted due to the dangerous and deadly Shubuhaat they carry and propagate. As for other Muslims other than those dangerous people of falsehood and bidah, then produce your proof to show that we do turn away from them when they give us Salaam. If you do not produce proof, then know that you have slandered and have persisted upon this slander for nearly three years.
As for the ruling with respect to greeting non-Muslims with other than As-Salaamu Alaykum, then let Muhammad Al-Maalikii explain to us what that affair has to do with shunning a Mubtadi or the obstinate people of falsehood. On the other hand, he has to produce evidence that we do turn away from the common Muslims when they give us salaam.
To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah
 For further details see: pages 58 onwards
[التعقبات الصريحة على رسالتي النصيحة للدكتور إبراهيم ابن عامر الرحيلي by Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhari]