Hidden Gossipers And Scaremongers Find It Very Hard To Accept the Fact That Salafipublications Are Upon Clarity And We Are Not Afraid To Make That Known
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Firstly: What should be the aim behind aiding and accompanying one another? We ask Allaah to guide us to this affair and forgive us our numerous shortcomings Aameen: https://salaficentre.com/2019/03/the-sole-objective-of-co-operating-with-one-another-o-allaah-grant-us-tawfeeq-to-always-recall-this-objective-and-keep-us-in-the-company-of-those-who-always-remind-us/
Secondly: Once again those who either follow evil desires or deliberately refuse to utilise their Uqool are seeking to abandon reality, whilst hurling false accusations at those whose adherence to the Salafi Manhaj- such as Salafipublications and the other students- is well known to the scholars. Indeed, we are neither afraid nor shy to openly defend the students and elder brothers at Salafipublications, just as Shaikh Rabee [may Allaah preserve him] says: ”And [with regards to] the person with the proofs, it is obligatory to take his speech [on the grounds] of following Allaah’s legislation and His Proofs, and not [due to] the personality of that person.” [Source: Majmoo 9/40) 3rd paragraph]
Therefore, we ask the idle gossipers: What is the basis of the praises received by the students at Salafipublications and those other students who are known for clarity upon this blessed Manhajus Salafi?
*Does Maktabah Salafiyyah and the other students in the various Maraakiz who copoperate with them hide behind fake internet identities?
*Does Maktabah Salafiyyah and the students in the other Maraakiz who cooperate with them support a single Mubtadi?
*Do they have any link with a single Mubtadi or an organization that defends Mubtadi’ah?
*Do they co-operate with the Jamaa’aat Siyaasiyah or those who co-operate with such Jamaa’aat?
*Do they co-operate with ahlul bidah wal-ahwaa in general or anyone associated with them?
*Do they promote the innovated principles of Hasan Al-Banna and Ikhwaan al muslimeen, or associate with anyone who does so?
*Do they uphold the false Manhaj of Muwaazanah or associate with anyone who promotes such false principles?
*Do they defend Sayyid Qutb or co-operate with anyone who defends him?
*Do they endorse the false principles: “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ and “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing amongst ourselves.’’
*Do they make a differentiation between Aqeedah and Manhaj when the scholars pass judgements against the people of bidah, or do they have a link with anyone who calls to these false principles?
*Do they hold the false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah, or do they have a link with anyone who holds this false view?
*Do they revile the Sahaabah and defend those who call them Ghuthaa-iyyah, or co-operate with anyone who defends such people?
*Do they utilise innovated principles in order to place the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the arena of ahlus Sunnah, or do they co-operate with anyone who deliberately utilises such false principles?
*Do they utilise the principles of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah, such as Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Al-Maghraawi, Yahyah al-Hajoori and others similar to them, or do they co-operate with anyone who defends these Mubtadi’ah after being well aware of the unambiguous knowledge based refutations against them?
*Do they praise Ahmad Raza Khan Brelvi, or was it Abdul Haadi who praised Him?
Finally: Maktabah Salafiyyah are well known to the scholars for their adherence to the authentic Sunnah and waging war against bidah and its people. Here is one example of what the scholars say http://salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=8601
We ask Allaah to keep us firm upon truth and guide the gossipers to correctness..Aameen
To be continued….InShaaAllaah
Donate to the Dawah
Top Posts & Pages
-  Remind those who praise or retweet without clarity that there is no ambiguity about the danger of false Tabdee perpetrated by Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadi and the virtue of recantation in the case of Dr. Sulaymaan Ar-Ruhayli and others who defend Dr.Muhammad
-  Daniel – the bald-faced liar – approaches one of the worst types of usury
-  Remind those who praise or retweet without clarity that there is no ambiguity about the need for caution in the case of Dr. Sulaymaan Ar-Ruhayli, Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadi, and Their Supporters
- The "Dahiya doctrine" and "Hannibal code"