In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Exalted] said:

وَيْلٌ لِّلْمُطَفِّفِينَ
الَّذِينَ إِذَا اكْتَالُوا عَلَى النَّاسِ يَسْتَوْفُونَ
وَإِذَا كَالُوهُمْ أَو وَّزَنُوهُمْ يُخْسِرُونَ
أَلَا يَظُنُّ أُولَٰئِكَ أَنَّهُم مَّبْعُوثُونَ
لِيَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ
يَوْمَ يَقُومُ النَّاسُ لِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

Woe to Al-Mutaffifin [those who give less in measure and weight (decrease the rights of others)], those who, when they have to receive by measure from men, demand full measure, and when they have to give by measure or weight to men, give less than due. Think they not that they will be resurrected (for reckoning), on a Great Day, the Day when (all) mankind will stand before the Lord of the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists)? [Surah Al-Mutaffifeen. Aayaat 1-7]

Imaam As-Sadi [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said:

This noble Aayah shows that just as a person takes from the people what he is entitled to, it is also obligated on him to give them everything they are entitled to – whether related to wealth or mutual dealings; rather included in the generality of this Aayah are proofs and statements, because indeed what usually takes place between those engaged in argumentation and discussion is that each of them is eager to establish his proofs, therefore, it is obligated on a person also to make known the proofs possessed by the other person and examine the proofs of the other person just as he examines his own proofs. In relation to this affair, the justice of a person is known as opposed to whether he is afflicted with bigotry, his humility as opposed to being haughty, his common sense as opposed to foolish behaviour. We ask Allah bestow on us every good. [Tafseer As-Sadi. paraphrased]

Therefore, in order to be upon moderation in this affair, we should avoid bigotry and unwarranted harshness. Indeed, there is no harm that we have engaged in discussion, rebutting and exchanging views based on different research presented by scientists in the West, but one must refrain from bigotry- refrain from employing bully tactics, fear-mongering, shopping around for the statements of the people of knowledge and belittling those Muslim scientists- regardless whether they are many or few – who either prefer alternative treatment to vaccines or they’ve refrained from accepting the offer to be vaccinated in the UK. Some of us – who prefer alternative treatment or have not accepted an offer for vaccination in the UK- have relatives – (including our parents)- who hold different views; but they neither vilify nor seek to bully us when we exchange views and researches on this subject matter. However, it seems that some British and American citizens are on a mission to bully and vilify everyone who presents research that favors alternative treatment to vaccines, therefore anyone who presents such research is either an anti-vaxxer or one upon falsehood. By Allaah! We are not unable to respond to their harshness, bigotry and bully tactics; rather the only reason we’ve refrained from responding to them – whilst they bully and vilify others openly and indirectly on social media (websites and twitter) – is that one our elder Salafi teachers – Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allaah preserve him] – wrote a clarification few months ago regarding moderation in this subject matter; so we sufficed ourselves with it – neither seeking to bully nor belittle anyone who disagrees with us; rather we deal gently with people in this affair. The debate between scientists – Muslims and non-Muslims – will continue, but we ask Allaah to include us amongst those who behave themselves in a manner beloved to Allaah. May Allaah reward Shaikh Abu Khadeejah with abundant good, because the clarification he wrote few months ago deals with this affair. Read: An Advice Regarding Differing Over COVID-19 ― And Understanding The Ijitihād Of Scholars In Worldly Affairs: https://www.abukhadeejah.com/advice-regarding-differing-over-covid-19/

Also, may Allaah reward Shaikh Abu Iyaadh with abundant Khayr for providing a lot of information on contagion and other affairs – rebutting the superstitions of the fear-mongers, alarmists, the proponents of Darwinism and those criminals who utilize medicine as a means of control and amassing wealth. Read: Principles Concerning “Infectious Disease” (al-ʿAdwā): https://www.salafidawahtooting.com/blog/principles-concernin-infectious-diseases

Vaccines in The UK

https://salaficentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Vaccines_In_The_UK.pdf
https://salaficentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/covid_pass.pdf

Finally, any doctor – in our country of residence -who personally recommends any vaccine to us shall be questioned and reminded as follows: Letter of Conditional Acceptance/Consent to GP pursuant Article 6 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) 2005 and Data Subject Access Request pursuant Article 15 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Dear Dr ………………..

I am writing to pose questions to you regarding the proposed X, Y or Z vaccinations. I hereby notify you that I shall only offer my consent to be vaccinated upon condition that the answers to each and every single question set out below is in the affirmative and all reasoning requested supplied to me as soon as reasonably practicable.

Q1: Are you Dr ……………., exercising your duties as a medical doctor as laid out by the GMC and do you stand by that at all material times? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q2: Are you satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the X, Y or Z vaccine is sufficiently safe and effective for mass rollout without a marketing licence? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q3: Are you satisfied that the X, Y or Z vaccine is even necessary with the generally accepted survival rate from disease X, Y or Z being around 99.96%, and the vast majority of recorded deaths being in the elderly and those with severe co-morbidities? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q4: Are you certain that the X, Y or Z vaccination campaign is not a human experiment? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q5: Do you therefore agree that fully informed consent of a man or a woman, boy or girl is a fundamental pre-requisite to both respecting their fundamental human rights under UDBHR, GDPR and due and proper fulfilment of your duty as a doctor? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q6: Do you have in your possession or control reliable data, independently verified, detailing the precise ingredients in the X, Y or Z vaccine? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q7: Are you satisfied as a medical doctor/professional that such vaccine ingredients shall not individually or collectively cause me adverse psychological and/or physical reactions? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q8: Are you prepared to sign a personal indemnity for the benefit of myself and/or my heirs/next-of-kin upon full unlimited liability in your private capacity for any harm or loss of life experienced by me from adverse reactions following upon my taking the vaccine in one or repeated doses? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q9: Do you understand that concealment of data and blocking or wilful refusal to provide data or information relating to our personal data is a criminal offence under Data Protection Act 2018 section 173? YES / NO (Circle your answer)

Q10: Are you prepared to set out your precise reasons upon independent evidence for your affirmative answers to Questions 2. 3 and 7? Kindly send me a reply signed in wet ink within one calendar month in order to comply with Data Protection requirements and answer my concerns in honour and lawful transparency. Thank you.

By:

(Signature in blue)

And Allaah knows best.