In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Exalted] said:
وَإِذَا قُلۡتُمۡ فَٱعۡدِلُواْ وَلَوۡ ڪَانَ ذَا قُرۡبَىٰ‌ۖ

And when you testify, be just, even if (it concerns) a near relative. [1]

When you testify by way of a statement to judge between people, differentiate between them in a discourse, and speak regarding matters and circumstances, be just in your speech, adhere to truthfulness regarding those you love and those you hate, be fair and do not conceal what needs to be made clear because it is forbidden and tantamount to injustice to divert (from justice and fairness) when speaking against the one you hate. [2]

Therefore, we remind ourselves of the fact that not all Jews are engaged in the plots of the Zionists, as Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him] stated, “It is important to note that not all Jews are involved in these intrigues and the Jews as a population have, throughout history, been subject to the whims and desires of their religious and political leaders, and have been made to undergo much persecution as a result”. Must read below:

https://abuiyaad.com/w/king-faisal-zionism?s=35

There is another Christian Zionist who aided Balfour and aided him in issuing his Zionist promise to the Jews [i.e. those Jews that ascribe to Zionism], and that was the Christian Zionist David Lloyd George, who became Prime Minister of England in 1916. Indeed, he clearly stated that his knowledge of the history of the Jews, and the names of Jewish places in Palestine, is more than his knowledge of the history of his country. His admiration for (Balfour) directed him towards Zionism.

Indeed, the importance of the Balfour Declaration from a Zionist political point of view sits tight on Britain’s official recognition of the existence of a nation for Jewish people. This was internationally recognised after the consolidation of the pledge through the process of the English Mandate over Palestine, after its approval at the San Remo Conference in 1920, and through the guarantee of the League of Nations in 1922. The Jewish Zionist Chaim Weizman said, “Do you think that Balfour was responding to us when he gave us the promise of establishing a national homeland in Palestine? No, the man was responding to religious belief by way of the teachings of the Old Testament”. [Footnote a] The promise was a letter sent by Balfour to the Jew Rothschild. It was expressed on November 2, 1917, in the text as follows: “Dear Lord Rothschild, it pleases me a lot to finalise with you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following statement: “In our close affinity with the wish of the Jews and Zionism, which have been presented and approved by the Council of Ministers, His Majesty’s Government considers with special privilege the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, and will do everything possible within its power to facilitate the achievement of this goal, and it shall be clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may infringe on the civil rights of non-Jewish groups resident in Palestine, [Footnote b] or the rights and legal status enjoyed by Jews in any European country. I owe you a debt of gratitude if you would communicate this statement to the Union. The loyal Zionist Arthur Balfour”.

This is why Chaim Weizman said, “Britain embraced the Zionist movement and took it upon itself to fulfil its idea”.

It is worth bearing in mind that this statement proclaimed by Britain was with the knowledge and approval of the Allies – officially approved by France in February 1918 and Italy in May, and preceded by negotiations in London between Jewish leaders, Britain, the French, and Italian governments. And regarding the promise to the Jews to establish a homeland in Palestine, it was officially approved in London, Paris, and Rome, and the publication of this approval was delayed until late October 1917. Also, the government of the United States of America and Tsarist Russia hastened to honour this promise. [3] [end of quote]

Footnote a: Maybe Balfour would not have followed this path if he had not been raised on this erroneous narrative- from a young age – from an abrogated and distorted Scripture. This emphasises the importance of sound nurturing even more, particularly in relation to sound creed. Al-Allaamah Abdullaah Bin Muhammad Bin Humayd [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “We say that children are the most important part of the family, so they must be taught what benefits them and are distanced from evil companions. Teaching them necessitates that which the Book and the Sunnah necessitate in their religious affairs so that they are nurtured upon a sound, beneficial, and good nurturing. We do not say that it is prohibited to study the beneficial worldly sciences because the religion of Islaam does not prohibit it, such as the knowledge of medicine, economics, business, and its likes. However, these affairs come after the rectification of the creed and after being [acquainted with] the knowledge of Tawheed. This is what is specified as an obligation”. “It is obligated to teachers to implant the true creed in the hearts of the young generation. They should clarify -for them- the wisdom, beauty, and underlying reasons behind the rulings of the Islamic law until their hearts grow in Imaan and radiate with its light so that they become upright and benefit their country, governments, Islamic Nation, its people, and the Religion. Therefore, the teacher who teaches your child should be an upright example for his pupils. They take him as an example in fulfilling the commands of Allah and in his manners”. “However, if his teacher is one of the corrupters, the enemies of Allah, His Messenger, the religion of Islaam, and the Muslim lands, (the student) will follow his footsteps because a student treads upon the fundamental principles of the teacher”. [4]

Footnote b: The truth about non-Jewish people’s rights in Palestine is as far away as the moon; instead, many Western politicians stand by whilst successive Zionist governments, especially the Netanyahu Phroanic Zionist government, slaughter and treat Palestinians in the most savage and cruel ways possible. Read articles by Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him]. Rules of Fighting in the Sharīʿah of Islām Compared to the Amalekite Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing Doctrine Invoked by Polish Jew Benjamin Mileikowsky Against Palestinian Arab Semites: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

UN expert warns of new instance of mass ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, calls for immediate ceasefire: https://abuiyaad.com/n/ben-shapiro-pathetic-jew-haters

Finally, from a historical perspective, the Children of Israel – behind whom the Zionists hide to pursue their lust for power and dominance – are not the natives of Palestine, rather, they entered the land during the time of Prophet Yu’sha Bin Noon [peace be upon him] whilst there were already tribes inhabiting the land. Read below:

[2] Evaluating the Zionists’ Claimed Right of Ownership of the Sacred Land

From a religious perspective, there is a distorted connection between the Zionists and some Christian factions in their claim that the Children of Israel – behind whom the Zionists hide to pursue their lust for power and dominance- are the rightful owners of Palestine. Read below:

[1] Evaluating the Zionists’ Claimed Right of Ownership of the Sacred Land

[1] Translator: Shaikh Abu Iyaad. NobleQur’an

[2] An Excerpt from Tafseer as-Sadi. Slightly paraphrased

[3]An Excerpt from “As-Sahyuniyyah An-Nasraaniyyah, Diraasah Fee Daw’i Al-Aqeedah Al-islaamiyyah”. pages 292-294

[4] An Excerpt from “Al-Fataawaa Wad-Duroos Fil Masjid Al-Haraam”. Pages 938-944