In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi [may Allaah preserve him] was asked about attendance at Islamic conferences [or gatherings] of knowledge that are under the supervision of the Jam-iyyaat [i.e. Islamic organizations of illegal partisanship] but also attended by Mashaayikh who are considered to be upon the Sunnah….So the Shaikh said that the brothers are aware of his speech concerning all these Jam-iyyaat. These Jam-iyyaat seek to promote and establish their goals through some of the Mashaa-yikh, therefore one should not attend.  Some of the Mashaayikh are unaware of the pursuit of these Jam-iyyaat through them.

https://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&controller=topic&id=130647

 

The Reality of Masjid Al-Furqaan’s Admin [Rusholme- Manchester]

Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin allies with deviants from Maghrib Institute and the Bid’ee Abu Usaaama. Likewise, they ally with Naveed Ayaz -the deceiver- who is allied with the hizbiyyoon of Greenlane and Masjid Sunnah [Cheethamhill]. However, this admin – every now and then- invites speakers from abroad to utilise as a shield. They hope that by either inviting people with qualifications or individuals teaching at Islamic institutions in some of the Muslim countries, or those said to have studied under some of the scholars, this would give them a good image in the eyes of the unsuspecting people. However, Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin is still upon its old ways – no disassociation from the Bid’ee Abu Usaamah, the deceiver Naveed Ayaz-ally of the Hizbiyyoon of Greenlane and Luton- and the hizbiyyoon of Al-Maghrib Institute. The Admin has not made any statement to free themselves from these individuals and organisations. Likewise, after they were caught promoting the books of Sayyid Qutb- the Mentor of the contemporary Takfeeris- they still have not made any clarifications to show that they are free from Sayyid Qutb, rather they have kept quiet whilst hoping that the Salafiyyoon will forget, then they can invite personalities from the Muslim lands to cover up their hizbi track record. See articles below

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/2-the-reality-of-masjid-al-furqans-admin-they-promote-the-books-of-sayyid-qutb-the-mentor-leader-and-guide-of-the-contemporary-khawaarij-takfeeri-terrorists-whilst-concealing-th/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/08/o-masjid-al-furqans-admin-the-allies-of-goldie-al-maghrib-institute-naveed-ayaaz-and-others-the-attendance-of-any-teacher-regardless-his-status-at-a-particular-masjid-or-the-explanati/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/08/a-fraudulent-claim-of-al-halabi-and-naveed-ayaaz-after-they-were-exposed-a-reminder-to-their-allies-at-masjid-al-furqan-rusholme-manchester-masjid-as-sunnah-cheethamhill-manchester-brixton-an/

 

---

To be continued…InShaaAllaah

Shaikh Ubaid [may Allaah preserve him] said: There is none who hides behind the Sunnah– the people beguiled by him, gathered around him to learn, adhered to him, became dependent on him and accepted everything he said–except that Allaah will reveal his affair, uncover and expose his concealed state of affairs to specific individuals and to the general public, regarding what was hidden and apparent of his deception, his mixing truth with falsehood, his plots and deceitful practices.  Allaah facilitates men of virtue, intelligence, wisdom, strength and exceptional natural ability–possessors of knowledge, skill and sound understanding of the religion–through whom He (Allaah) unveils the affair of that trickster, dubious and deceitful person.

---

Source: Excerpt from the following article

 

[2] The Correct stance Towards the differing of the scholars concerning Jarh and Tadeel-Shaikh Ubaid(may Allaah preserve him)

Question: Can you give us a clarification about the statement of some of the people, who say that, the brothers at al Maktabahtus Salafiyyah do not follow some of the Scholars…

http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

 

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

This is the final post regarding the affair of the Bid’ee [Abu Usaama] but we will return InShaaAllaah whenever the Bid’ee attempts to defile the Salafi Manhaj.

The Bid’ee places himself as on the side of the “so called moderates’’ while those who question this corrupt moderation with clear proofs are a people who exceed the limits! Greenlane’s Admin invites deviant speakers from Al-Maghrib Institute and Ihyaa At-Turaath, whilst the Bid’ee provides flimsy cover for their Hizbiyyah. One is immediately placed in the ‘Ghulaat Register’ by the Bid’ee when his and Greenlane’s corrupt alliances are critically questioned based on what the Salafi Manhaj necessitates. On the other hand, one is considered a moderate when he accommodates those people of bidah who are close to the Bid’ee and Greenlane’s Admin – a corrupt trait of the ‘Hizbi Enterprise.’

In a sign of increasing frustration, the Bid’ee always deceives when seeking to aid Greenlane’s Admin after a series of devastating refutations against them by the students at Salafipublications (may Allaah preserve them). [Visit Salafis.Com | The Salafi Call and Methodology and read articles titled: The Conference of Greenlane Lane Mosque (Singers and Ikhwanis)]

Likewise, the Bid’ee’s employers at Greenlane invite speakers to help them conceal their crimes against the Salafi Manhaj, side by side with Dr Ali Shibl, telling unsuspecting listeners that they should not lend an ear to those who refute Greenlane’s Admin. They invited a number of foreign speakers to conceal their true state of affairs, but to no avail. These were desperate tactics that neither distracted the Salafiyyoon nor weakened their resolve by the Tawfeeq of Allaah.

The Bid’ee is happy to carry on being the disgraced ring leader of the ‘Hizbi Advocacy Service’. As the main public stuntman of Greenlane’s Admin, he has spent quite a few years specialising in Hizbiyyah and deception- the ‘prime mover’ and ‘essential cog’ in the ‘Joint Hizbi Enterprise’. His usual last-ditch attempt to win the sympathy of his unsuspecting followers has always been, ‘’Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbaad does not see that Al-Maribi is a Mubtadi’’. The reader is strongly advised to read the article in this link http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/09/why-shaikh-rabee-was-correct-and-shaikh-abdul-muhsin-was-wrong-yet-both-are-rewarded/ because it destroys this deceitful argument utilised by the Bid’ee in order to downplay the affair of a dangerous and vile Mubtadi. Also listen here: http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat and Husnul Khaatimah

———————————————————————————————————

A Series in Response to Abu Usama’s Habitual Deceitfulness

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/mindless-bidee-abu-usaamah-should-solely-bear-the-burden-of-his-crimes-and-refrain-from-invoking-the-curse-of-allaah-against-his-children-in-seeking-to-prove-the-unprovable/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/1-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/2-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses-examining-another-recent-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/3-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-call-to-truthfulness-amid-his-past-and-present-track-record-of-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/4-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-claim-that-we-are-from-those-rough-tough-people/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/5-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamss-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-he-deceitfully-refrained-from-explaining-and-stating-the-scholarly-restrictions-regarding-the-principl/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/6-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-the-false-claim-that-there-is-that-drama-between-us-and-him/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/7-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-a-precise-observation-by-ustaadh-abu-uwais-rahimahullaah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/8-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-motivated-by-deep-malice-he-made-a-fruitless-and-desperate-attempt-to-prove-that-we-follow-a-shaikh-who-is-upon-bidah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/9-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-malicious-speculation-and-desperate-scapegotery/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/10-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-keyboard-warriors-the-bidee-is-wilfully-oblivious-of-the-fact-that-words-and-terms-have-to-match-behaviour/

[11] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness-[SP’s Salafiyyah Is a Great Source of Heartache, Grief and Anxiety For The Bid’ee!]

 

 

 

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Traits of An Innovator: Ali Al-Halabi’s Cutting off Speech,  Playing About with it and Distorting it’s Meanings. Abu Usaamah himself said about Ali Al-Halabi – “ I am a supporter of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi. I support him. I support what he is upon.”¹.

Ali Al-Halabi is known for his cutting off speech, adding to it and distorting it, in order to support his corrupt principles. An example of this which follows is his cutting from the speech of Imaam Abdur-Rahmaan As-Sa’di (rahimahullah). Here let us first present to the reader the original text from the Imaam himself, before any distortions were added by Al-Halabi. Once the reader acquaints himself with such trickery then this is in reality enough (a reason) to bring Al-Halabi down and warn against him!

من الغلط الفاحش الخطر قبول قول الناس بعضهم ببعض، ثم يبنى عليه السامع حبا أو بغضا، ومدحا وذما؛ فكم حصل بهذا الغلط من أمور صار عاقبتها الندامة، وكم أشاع الناس عن الناس أمورا لا حقيقة لها بالكلية، أو لها بعض الحقيقة فنميت بالكذب والزور، وخصوصا ممن عرفوا بعدم المبالاة بالنقل، أو عرف منهم الهوى.

فالواجب على العاقل التثبت والتحرز، وعدم التسرع.

وبهذا يعرف دين المرء ورزانته وعقله

Imaam as Sa’di (rahimahullah) said in the above that (slightly paraphrased) “from the repugnant dangerous mistakes is when people accept one another’s speech, then the one who hears that speech establishes love, hate, praise and dispraise based on that”. Then the Imaam further stated that “how many mistakes have been committed [through this behaviour] regarding affairs whose end result became a matter of regret?!  And how many affairs have been spread by people from other people which are complete unreality?! Or it has some reality, so lies and falsehood are added to it, especially those known for not having concern regarding what they narrate, or known for following desires. Therefore, it is obligated on an ‘aaqil (a sensible person with sound reasoning and intellect) that he ascertains, takes precaution and not to be hasty. And by way of this, the religion of a person is known [i.e. the soundness of his path], his composure and ‘aql [sound reasoning or intellect]”

So the above statement is an example of that which was doctored by Al-Halabi purposely to suit his own agenda and methodology. Ali Al-Halabi transmitted a cut down version, in his book [Manhajus Salafus Saaleh’ 2nd Edition’ page 229] from the statement of Imaam Abdur-Rahmaan As-Sadi (rahimahullaah) as follows:

 من الغلط الفاحش الخطر قبول قول الناس بعضهم ببعض، ثم يبنى عليه السامع حبا أو بغضا، ومدحا وذما؛ فكم حصل بهذا الغلط من

 أمور صار عاقبتها الندامة، وكم أشاع الناس عن الناس أمورا لا حقيقة لها بالكلية،

 فالواجب على العاقل التثبت والتحرز، وعدم التسرع.

وبهذا يعرف دين المرء ورزانته وعقله

So based on the above version (transmitted by Al-Halabi Al-Mubtadi), it means that the Imaam said “from the repugnant dangerous mistakes is when people accept one another’s speech, then the one who hears that speech establishes love, hate, praise and dispraise based on that”; then he [Halabi] went on to complete it with “how many mistakes have been committed (through this behaviour) regarding affairs whose end result became a matter of regret?!  And how many affairs have been spread by people from other people which are a complete unreality?! Therefore, it is obligated on an aaqil (i.e. a sensible person of intellect) that he ascertains, takes precaution and not to be hasty. And by way of this, the religion of a person is known (i.e. soundness of his path), his composure and aql (sound reasoning or intellect).

After Ali Al-Halabi transmitted this statement, he commented, saying: “Be careful, may Allaah protect you; the Shaikh (i.e. Imaam Sadi) did not distinguish in this warning regarding accepting from a thiqah (a reliable person) and ghayr thiqah (an unreliable person)! Indicating to the mistake that may occur even from a reliable person; and the مفاسد  (corrupt affairs), محن  (adversities, trials ordeals etc),  بلاء  (affliction) and  إحن  (enmity, rancour, malice arises from some affair) that results from it. (See specimen on next page)

 

Dear Reader take note! Halabi purposely cut out from the speech of Imaam As-Sadi in order to confuse the reader. The principle utilised by ahlus-Sunnah is that we accept the news given by the one who is thiqah (the trustworthy, reliable person) without the need to verify or check the statement. Halabi wants to distort and change this principle and so purposely omits the following sentence:

[و لها بعض الحقيقة فنميت بالكذب والزور، وخصوصا ممن عرفوا بعدم المبالاة بالنقل، أو عرف منهم الهوى –

“Or it has some reality, so lies and falsehood are added to it, especially those known for not having concern regarding what they narrate, or known for following desires.”

So why is it omitted? Because if he were to include the full statement, it would no longer give credence to his own innovated principle of “having to verify from everyone – thiq’a (trustworthy) or ghayr thiq’a (non trustworthy)”. Furthermore he makes manifest his own innovated principle, as part of his notes, in order to pollute the reader’s thinking into holding that you “must check and verify the statements of a thiqa’ person”, in the same way you must verify one who isn’t thiqa’. This is in contradiction to even how Imaam as-Sa’di(rahimahullah) presented it, as he was making clear to the reader to beware those who are untrustworthy- not trustworthy.

So let us see what Imaam Sadi (rahimahullaah) stated regarding the news given by a faasiq (open sinner) and a truthful person. Allaah (The Most High) said: “O you who believe! If a faasiq comes to you with news, verify it.”

Imaam Sadi commented on this ayah saying:

“This is also from the etiquettes expected from those of understanding to adorn themselves with and implement. And that when a faasiq informs them of some news, they [should] verify the news he transmits (to them) and don’t just simply accept it; for indeed there is a grave danger in that and [risk] of falling into sin. Because if his news is made the same as that of a truthful upright person, the decision is made in accordance with that and what it necessitates. Then lost of lives and wealth occurs without due right due to that information, resulting in regret.

Rather what it is obligatory is that when a faasiq transmits news, it is verified and clarified. If the proofs and supporting factors affirm his truthfulness, it is acted upon and believed. And if they indicate to falsehood, it is declared false and not acted upon.

So in this is a proof that the news [transmitted by] the truthful one is accepted and the news from the liar rejected, while the news from a faasiq is (temporarily) suspended as we have mentioned, and that is why the Salaf would accept narrations from many of those (particular) khawaarij who were well known to be truthful, even if they were wicked sinners.”

Abu Usaamah’s Similar deceitful, cutting, pasting & doctoring to suit his own agenda- Live on stage! A Mirror of the Above from Halabi…

In 2010 Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi carried out a similar action, whereby he added to the words of Shaikh Sadlaan during a tele-link. This is an imitation of his mubtadi Shaykh Ali Al Halabi—about whom Abu Usamah himself said (in his feeble video defence when ending up in the wrong masjid):

I am a supporter of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi. I support him. I support what he is upon. His mistakes we put that aside. I say that in public and I say that in private.

Ustaadh Abdulilah Lahmami (may Allaah preserve him) caught him at the time, writing:

“Then Abu Usama Khalifah added in the translation that Sheikh Rabee’ should stop “cursing the dead people… “Due to a hadeeth of the Prophet salallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam mentioning this. This addition was not mentioned by Sheikh Sadlan in the Arabic so take note.”

So once again, Abu Usaamah was caught out, adding to the speech of the Shaykh in order to cause confusion, and fitnah; and spread rancour in the hearts of the people toward Shaykh Rabee’ (hafidhahullah)- and this due to nothing except, that which burns inside him, against the noble Shaykh; and the Salafis as a whole. Ustaadh Abdulilah (may Allaah preserve him) also said:

“After visiting Sheikh Rabee’ ibn Haadi Al-Madkhali this weekend, he added that one should clarify to the people that he does not curse the dead (as Abu Usama khalifah added) and likewise to make mention that the scholars have always refuted the errors of those who have erred. Likewise, these refutations are a mercy for the dead so that people don’t follow them in their errors.’’²

Here we remind you again the statement of Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool: “And whenever you find the statement of a muhaqqiq scholar being utilized as proof by a person of bid’ah and falsehood in seeking to establish his falsehood; and you refer that statement back to its original source- you will not find except that this (person of falsehood) did cut off and separate some part of it from another part.’’3

And so we can see that the bid’ee Abu Usaamah is just a mirror of his innovator Shaykh Ali Hassan Al-Halabi. There is no difference in their methodology! This is affirmed by Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi’s own statements as quoted before; as well as his actions, wherein both have been caught twisting speech of the Scholars of truth and Sunnah, in order to suit their agenda and ideology that they want to promote.

It is important that the noble reader is made aware of such sneaky trickery, lest they be taken in by their speech, and be taken astray, and with Allah is the success.

---

 

1: His Youtube Response (link)
2: For further details see link: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=10356
3: Wasaa’l Ahlil Baatil Fee Taqreeri Baatilihim’ page: 63

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his deceptive response to the Friday incident at al-Markazus Salafi, the Bid’ee attacked our beloved teachers, elders and brothers at SP, as usual accusing them of Ghuloo. We have already replied to the Bid’ee’s slander that we are upon a bidah principle –[Link: http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/8-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-motivated-by-deep-malice-he-made-a-fruitless-and-desperate-attempt-to-prove-that-we-follow-a-shaikh-who-is-upon-bidah/] and now we will briefly make known why the Bid’ee hates the students and elders at SP.

Indeed, the malice and hatred harboured by the Bid’ee against the Salafiyoon at SP is due to nothing else other than the fact that they repel his lowly desires and corrupt hizbi ambitions. Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghani (rahimahullaah) said:  ”Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle trials and disorder.  They are a chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of trials and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan (i.e. those who steadfastly follow the ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah). Have they (i.e. the people of Sunnah) committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass- alongside enmity and innovation- whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion)”. [Source: عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية 1/26-27]

The Bid’ee cannot come to terms with the fact that SP – by the Mercy and Tawfeeq of Allaah- have remained steadfast, neither compromising with Mubtadi’ah nor their obstinate followers; rather they continue to transmit the sound Aqeedah and Manhaj from the scholars. He cannot come to terms with the fact his continued public stunts -in order to slander SP- has always met failure. And among those  incidents was Shaikh Wasiyullah’s first visited to the Uk, Shaikh Sadlaan’s visit, the different attempts to entice speakers from Saudi, such as Dr Ali Shibl to beautify Greenlane’s ugly affair etc. All these public stunts failed miserably because SP held onto the sound Manhaj positions, for regardless who visits Greenlane’s Admin or speaks good of them, their hizbiyyah still manifests itself like the midday sun. How can an Admin that cooperate with the people of Bidah [at Ihyaa at-Turaath, al-Maghrib Institute and other deviants] be benefitted by any praise?! A person is judged based on what he is upon, so listen to the clarification here: http://safeshare.tv/v/bWPR3Eacn4k

SP did not compromise with anyone, but the Bid’ee compromised and thus ended up in the fitnah of the Mubtadi’ah, the people of Bidah, the hizbiyyoon, the Mu’mayyi’oon – be it Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi, Ihyaa at-Turaath etc Rather, the Bid’ee has even defended Ismaeel Menk – a deobandi. See refutation of Ismaaeel-Menk:http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/who-is-mufti-menk/    http://safeshare.tv/v/ss570a54c03bd31

The Bid’ee beautifies the filth of these people of bidah; yet SP are the Ghulaat! This is the despicable opinion of this spiteful transgressor against those who are foremost in bringing clarity in the West, and continue to do so by the permission and Tawfeeq of Allaah (The Most High). These are the Ghulaat, according to Abu Usaama, because they expose his lowly desires, repel his crimes against the Salafi Manhaj and unveil the malicious insinuations of his mentors.  None trusts or entertains this spiteful transgressor except those who employ him at Greenlane to do their dirty job or those who are unaware of his true state of affairs. As for his unsuspecting followers, there is nothing that describes his relationship with them better than the saying: ‘’The trust of the innocent is the liar’s most useful tool.’’

As for the Salafiyyoon, he attempts to stab them with his bidah, deceptions and doubts, but when caught he cuts himself – bleeding and playing the victim game. This is why whenever he seeks to deceive and gets caught, he screams ‘the Ghulaat!’  This behaviour is nothing else but a painful manifestation of frustration because the Salafiyyoon already know that his lies and deceptions are underpinned by an unquestionable acquaintance with the truth he wishes to hide or distort.

The Salafiyyoon know that his perverse and strong desire to slander them is underpinned by nothing else but unjustified vengeance –  stop destroying my plots against the sound Manhaj positions or else I will slander you!!! This is what his actions and statements necessitate; so if what he hides is worse than what he manifests- and only Allaah knows this- then may Allaah open his heart to guidance or give the spiteful transgressor what he deserves. Aameen

The Manhaj of SP is clear and there are no ambiguities in the affair, so ask yourselves the following questions:

*Does Abu Khadeejah, Abu Hakeem and Maktabah Salafiyyah defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi? No indeed; rather it is the bid’ee who promotes Mubtadiah!

*Do they have any links with a single Mubtadi or an organization that defends Mubtadi’ah? Do they co-operate with the Jamaa’aat Siyaasiyah or those who co-operate with such Jamaa’aat? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who cooperates with Ihyaa at-Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute and others!

*Do they co-operate with ahlul bidah wal-ahwaa or anyone associated with them? No indeed; rather it is the bid’ee who promotes and defends the deobandi Ismaaeel Menk!

*Do they promote the innovated principles of Hasan Al-Banna and Ikhwaan al muslimeen, or associate with anyone who does so? No indeed; rather it is Bid’ee who praises al-Maribi (an upholder of ikhwaani principles)!

*Do they uphold the false Manhaj of Muwaazanah or associate with anyone who promotes such false principles? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises Al-Maribi (an upholder of Muwaazanaat)!

*Do they defend Sayyid Qutb or co-operate with anyone who defends him? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who sits with Ihyaa at-Turaath (sympathisers of Sayyid)!

*Do they endorse the false principles: “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ and “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing among ourselves?’’ No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who defends and supports Ali al-Halabi (an upholder of these false principles)!

*Do they make a differentiation between Aqeedah and Manhaj when the scholars pass judgements against the people of bidah, or do they have a link with anyone who calls to these false principles? No indeed; rather their websites are filled with clarifications regarding this important affair!

*Do they hold the false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah, or do they have a link with anyone who holds this false view? No indeed; they have no link with any of these people!

*Do they revile the Sahaabah and defend those who call them Ghuthaa-iyyah, or co-operate with anyone who defends such people? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises al Maribi (the innovator of this speech)!

*Do they utilise innovated principles in order to place the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the arena of ahlus Sunnah, or do they co-operate with anyone who deliberately utilises such false principles? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises al-Maribi (an upholder of this calamity)!

*Do they utilise the principles of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah, such as Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Al-Maghraawi, Yahyah al-Hajoori and others similar to them, or do they co-operate with anyone who defends these Mubtadi’ah after being well aware of the unambiguous knowledge based refutations against them? No indeed; rather they refute all these Mubtadi’ah!

*Do they praise Ahmad Raza Khan Brelvi, or was it Abdul Haadi who praised Him? No indeed; rather they refute those who shelter the people who uttered such falsehood!

The Reality of Maktabah salafiyyah

http://salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=8601

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=18&Topic=4897

http://salaficentre.com/2012/07/shaikh-hasan-al-banna-on-witnessing-salafi-publications/

Indeed, it is not SP who commit crimes against the Salafi Manhaj, rather it is the Bid’ee and his associates who are guilty of it. We remind ourselves once again; Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghani (rahimahullaah) said:  Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle trials and disorder.  They are a chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of trials and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan (i.e. those who steadfastly follow the ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah). Have they (i.e. the people of Sunnah) committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass- alongside enmity and innovation- whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion). [Source: عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية 1/26-27]

And Allaah knows best

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah