Salaficentre Appeal 2019

[10] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness [Keyboard Warriors – The Bid’ee is Wilfully Oblivious of The Fact That Words and Terms Have to Match Behaviour]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Bid’ee said that we are ‘Keyboard Warriors’

Indeed, the Bid’ee is enraged by the response to his blatant and unequivocal falsehood, regardless whether a pen or keyboard is utilised for that purpose! But let us examine whether his description matches our behaviour.

Who Are Keyboard Warriors?

Keyboard warriors are people who, being unable to express their anger through physical violence (owning to their physical weakness, lack of bravery and/or conviction in real life), instead manifests said emotions through the text-based medium of the internet, usually in the form of aggressive writing that the Keyboard Warrior would not (for reasons previously mentioned) be able to give form to in real life; or a person who makes abusive or aggressive posts on the internet, typically one who conceals their true identity.

Let us comment on the underlined phrases and sentences in the above about keyboard warriors:

[1] Being unable to express their anger through physical violence;

Comment: Alhamadulil laah, we have never threatened the bid’ee with physical violence, rather he is the one known for that. See here: http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/abu-usaamah-hurls-vile-abuse-at-brothers-calling-to-allah/   http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/abu-usamah-ad-dhahabi-glm-despicable-attempted-assault-must-read/

[2] Instead manifests said emotions through the text-based medium of the internet, usually in the form of aggressive writing that the Keyboard Warrior would not (for reasons previously mentioned) be able to give form to in real life;

Comment: Alhamdulil laah, the firmness and toughness we manifest to the Bid’ee is confined within the advice of Shaikh Ahmad (rahimahullaah), so we boycott him and warn against him in real life – we keep away from him physically and warn against him verbally. This is the sound manhaj because an open caller to Bidah and Shubuhaat is very dangerous.

[3] Or a person who makes abusive or aggressive posts on the internet, typically one who conceals their true identity.

Comment: Alhamdulil laah, all those who refute the Bid’ee are known, whether individual students of knowledge or Masjid Admins -they are all known. And never have we described him except with what he deserves-   a deceitful one, loud mouth, conniving, twister, foul mouth, slanderer etc

To be continued….In-Shaa-Allaah

 

Continue Reading

[9] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness –[Malicious Speculation and Desperate Scapegotery]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

————————————————————————————————————————-

The Bid’ee says that if you do not agree with the Rulings of Shaikh Rabee, they throw you outside The Sunnah

————————————————————————————————————————-

Indeed, a sensible person asks him (herself): ‘’If it were the case that the Bid’ee was  declared misguided merely because he does not agree with Shaikh Rabee, then why is it that nether Shaikh Rabee nor the Salafiyyoon of the West preceded Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) in that verdict?’’ This is a simple answer, but unfortunately the Bid’ee is overwhelmed by an intense self-delusion, which turns him away from reality and leaves him clinging to fallacies and absurd speculations.

The man is negligent, idle and careless in his thinking and frightened of the truth. These bad habits have always manifested whenever he maliciously speculates or desperately looks for a scapegoat – we declared him misguided because he does not agree with the rulings of Shaikh Rabee!!! This shows that the Bid’ee’s intellect replaces reality with fallacy and facts with speculation. This is why you find him saying that if a person tells you that he (Goldie) supports Al-Maribi, then such a person will not be able to give you any evidence. However, examine his statement in 2004, as follows:

WHAT I STILL BELIEVE TODAY Wa Lilaahi-l-Hamd, that Abul Hasan IS SALAFEE and that the (TRUE) MAJOR SCHOLARS of this era, Imaam al-Albaanee and Imaam Ibn Baaz and Imaam Ibn ‘Uthaimeen and Shaikh Muqbil (may Allah have mercy upon them) they all died while being pleased with him – and that carries some weight and consideration in this Deen?! (raghm unoofihim)

The Bid’ee made this statement after the clear proofs had been established against Al-Maribi by many amongst the people of knowledge, yet he claims that there is no evidence that he supports al-Maribi and that he is declared misguided because he does not agree with the rulings of Shaikh Rabee!

Firstly: Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) was the first one who refuted Al-Maribi in detail, but also other scholars gave their verdicts. See here:http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Secondly: All the above scholars gave a verdict against Al-Maribi, which means that they agreed with Shaikh Rabee. However, not a single one of them declared Abu Usaama misguided besides Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) – that is because it was Shaikh Ahmad (rahimahullaah) who was asked specifically about Abu Usaama’s affair.

Thirdly: The verdict against Abu Usaama was given in the light of the detail evidences presented against Al-Maribi and Abu Usaama’s state of affairs, for one has to understand that not all the supporters of Al-Maribi were the same- some were duped and others like Abu Usaama are obstinate deceivers.  The question Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked clearly makes known who Abu Usaama was and his actions.

Question:  “O Shaykh Ahmad we have with us in America a man called Abu Usaamah, who is considered to be from the Du’aat, he aids and supports Abul-Hasan and he calls some noble Salafi brothers ghulaat (extremists), muqallidah (blind followers), and muhqiboon (the people whose religion is the religion of the one they blindly follow), so what is the legislated position from this man and how should we deal with him?’’

Answer: “Your position with him is the same as your position with the People of Innovation. Turn away from him and abandon him.”

Therefore, one clearly sees that the verdict against Abu Usaama was an independent one based on what was known of his evil state of affairs, and not merely due to the fact that he opposed the rulings of Shaikh Rabee. This claim of the Bid’ee is nothing else but a malicious speculation and desperate scapegotery. Neither Shaikh Rabee nor the Salafiyyoon are to be blamed for his downfall, rather he is a Mukallaf- responsible for his own actions unless it is proven that he is mentally unstable.

Finally: It is very clear that the Bid’ee treats fallacies as reality. He allows himself to be submerged in false certainty and self-delusion. He is obsessed with finding fault with Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) because the Shaikh exposed the bidah of his beloved Mubtadi’ah mentors (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi) and the Hizbi organisations he cooperates with (Ihyaa at-Turaath). The man is a waste of time, conniving, deceitful, slanderous and dishonest. The Bid’ee is once again reminded about his evil tongue and his slanders against Shaikh Rabee;

Ibn Asaakir (rahimahullaah) said: Know O my brother! May Allaah grant us and you His pleasure and make us from those who have awe of Him and fear of Him as He should be feared. Indeed, the flesh of the scholars is poisonous and Allaah’s way of disclosing the hidden affairs of those who diminish their worth is well known. [Source: Tabyeen Kadhib Al-Muftaree Fee Maa Nusiba Ilal-Imaam Abil Hasan Al-Ash’aree: page 29]

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: None violates the honour of the scholars who are upon the truth, except one of three (people): Either a hypocrite known for (his) hypocrisy, or an evil sinner who hates the scholars because they prevent him from his sinful (acts) of disobedience, or a misguided hizbi who hates the scholars because they neither agree with his hizbiyyah nor with his deviated views. [Source: Muhaadaraat Fil Aqeedah Wad-Dawa 2/190]

We ask Allaah to protect from Goldie and his lying tongue. Aameen

To be continued…InShaaAllaah

Continue Reading

[8] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness-[Motivated By Deep Malice, He Made a Fruitless and Desperate Attempt to Prove That We Follow a Shaikh Who Is Upon Bidah]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) said:

“And on the other side of those ones who make Takfeer based on falsehood are a people who do not know the creed of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah as it is obligated; or they know some of it and are ignorant of some of it.  As for what they know, they conceal it and do not clarify it for the people. They neither forbid innovations nor censure Ahlul Bidah and punish them; rather they may censure a statement in the Sunnah and a fundamental of the religion completely and would not differentiate between what Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah say and what Ahlul Bidah Wal Furqah (The people of innovation and splitting) say, or they would affirm all their differing Madhabs.”  [See full article here: http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/muhammad-al-maliki-a-tamyi-plague-victim-an-ally-of-goldie-and-masjid-al-furqans-admin-rusholmemanchester/Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 12/467]

Reader: In this article we will –InShaaAllaah – demonstrate the manner in which the Bid’ee sought to conceal and deceive his unsuspecting followers and make them believe that there is a Shaikh we follow who is upon Bidah. The Bid’ee stated that he was declared a man of Bidah because he does not hold that Al-Maribi is a Mubtadi, and this itself is a bidah our Shaikh and us are upon. Then the Bid’ee stated that he is free from this bidah (principle) even if any Shaikh says so.

Firstly: Shaytaan must have whispered to him that we are upon this principle because he did not give any evidence to support his claim, and this is expected of this treacherous, deceitful and conniving Bid’ee.

Secondly: Shaytaan must have whispered to him that our Shaikh -(we don’t know which Shaikh he intends because all the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah are our Shaikhs)- is upon this principle in the manner he presented it. So here he made a specific statement, but did not have the courage to mention a name because he knows without a doubt that neither the Shaikh he intends nor ourselves are upon this principle. We remind this treacherous, conniving and shameless slanderer of the following:

Ibn Asaakir (rahimahullaah) said: Know O my brother! May Allaah grant us and you His pleasure and make us from those who have awe of Him and fear of Him as He should be feared. Indeed, the flesh of the scholars is poisonous and Allaah’s way of disclosing the hidden affairs of those who diminish their worth is well known. [Source: Tabyeen Kadhib Al-Muftaree Fee Maa Nusiba Ilal-Imaam Abil Hasan Al-Ash’aree: page 29]

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: None violates the honour of the scholars who are upon the truth, except one of three (people): Either a hypocrite known for (his) hypocrisy, or an evil sinner who hates the scholars because they prevent him from his sinful (acts) of disobedience, or a misguided hizbi who hates the scholars because they neither agree with his hizbiyyah nor with his deviated views. [Source: Muhaadaraat Fil Aqeedah Wad-Dawa 2/190]

Thirdly: The treacherous Bid’ee said that any Shaikh who holds this principle –obviously in the deceitful manner he presented it – then he is free from it. So here the malicious Bid’ee generalised his statement, but the fact of the matter is that there is no scholar of Ahlus Sunnah who holds this principle in the manner the bid’ee presented it; rather the people who hold this principle (in the manner the bid’ee presented it) are the Haddaadiyyah, just as Shaikh Rabee stated: ‘’They (i.e. haddaadiyyah) declare a person an innovator when he fails to declare a person who has fallen into innovation an innovator.’’ However, this loud mouthed miscreant intended nothing else but malice and outright slander, so he concealed the specific details in this Mas’alah. Therefore, let the readers examine for themselves the details regarding this Mas’alah. See link: http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/5-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamss-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-he-deceitfully-refrained-from-explaining-and-stating-the-scholarly-restrictions-regarding-the-principl/

Finally: After reading the short article in the above link, the reader clearly sees that the bid’ee concealed the detail explanation of this Mas’alah in order to hurl slander at us. The Bid’ee is wilfully oblivious of the fact that he cannot escape with the likes of this distortion and cannot seek to declare us misguided except with unambiguous knowledge based proofs.

This shows that this man is an establsihed malicious liar,  deceiver and distorter. Shaytaan has made lying against the Salafiyyoon fair seeming to him, so he has no choice but to lie against the Salafiyyoon when circumstances make it feasible to do so. We ask Allaah to protect us from his evil, slanderous tongue- the wicked tongue that slanders Salafiyyoon and praises Mubtadi’ah. Aameen

Continue Reading

[7] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness- [A Precise Observation by Ustaadh Abu Uwais (rahimahullaah)]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

من صمت نجا

”The one who keeps quiet will be saved.” [1]

Ibn Abdul Barr (rahimahullaah) said: Speaking with good, (such as) remembrance of Allaah, recitation of the Qur’aan and deeds of righteousness (by way of the tongue) is more virtuous than keeping quiet, likewise uttering a word of truth, bringing about reconciliation between the people and what is similar to it; but praiseworthy silence is to (refrain from uttering) falsehood. [2]

Indeed, this is what we advise ourselves and everyone else, including the Bid’ee – that we either speak truth or refrain from uttering falsehood and doubts. However, the Bid’ee does not refrain from falsehood, just as Ustaadh Abu Uwais (rahimahullaah) stated in 2004: Much of the fitnah connected to Abu Usaama is because  he does not have the ability to shut his mouth; he does not have the ability to stay in his place, to be quiet and to stay out of affairs that do not concern him”.

Reader: There is no doubt that since the Bid’ee took it upon himself to defend Mubtadi’ah, he has always uttered falsehood when seeking to defend his stances. Indeed, it is evil enough when a person utters a single sentence of falsehood to defend the indefensible or to hide the unambiguous knowledge based proofs, then how about  a loud mouth who speaks to defend the indefensible! This is Abu Usaama – a loud mouth who seeks to defend the indefensible! He is absolutely certain of his dishonesty and deception whenever seeking to reply to the Salafiyyoon, but he cannot help himself from speaking well before he can determine or anticipate the possible damage. Ibn Abdi Rabbihi (rahimahullaah) said: ”Choosing speech is more difficult than authorship, and indeed it is said: The choice of a man (in speech) is in harmony with his intellect.” [3]

Yoonus Ibn Ubayd (rahimahullaah) said: ”Indeed, you see a man fasting a lot, abstaining from the forbidden affairs and praying the night prayer, whilst he testifies to falsehood in the morning.”  [4]

Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (rahimahullaah) said: ”Neither hajj, nor taking up positions during battle, nor Jihaad are more difficult than restraining the tongue.” [5]

However, the Bid’ee is wilfully oblivious of the fact that holding a view and rushing to speak does not bring about any change in the stances of the Salafiyyoon, unless they are backed by unambiguous knowledge based proofs. We ask Allaah to protect us from falsehood. Aameen


[1] As-Saheehah Number 535

[2] At-Tamheed 20/22

[3] Quoted by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Umar Saalim Baazmool in Manhajul Bahthi Al-Ilmiy Wa-Kitaabah Fee Uloom Ash-Sharee-ah: page: 17

[4] Hilyatul Awliyaa 3/20

[5] Jaami-ul Uloom Wal-Hikam:page:145

 

Continue Reading

[6] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness- [The False Claim That There Is That ‘DRAMA’ Between Us and Him]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his deceptive response to the Friday incident at Al-Markazus Salafi, the bid’ee stated that whilst leaving the Masjid he told one of the brothers not to expose the common people to the drama we have between ourselves (i.e. between us and him).

Reader: There is no drama between us and the Bid’ee, rather he is being wilfully oblivious of the fact that we do not behave in the manner he behaves. It would be praiseworthy if he strives to address his personality problems, rather than project onto others problems he needs to address within himself. There is no drama between him and the Salafiyyoon; rather the affair between us and him is nothing else other than a clear distinction between Salafiyyah and misguidance. Therefore, O reader! Read carefully the words of Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (hafidhahullaah) regarding this clear distinction between us and the Bid’ee, and you will come to know that our affair with him involves no drama at all. Ustaadh Amjad stated:

Ibn al-Qayyim said in al-Fawaa’id:

A Lofty Benefit: The Basis, Origin of Every Knowledge and Action:

The basis, origin of all theoretical knowledge and every wilfully chosen action are the thoughts (khawaatir) and ideas (afkaar). For they necessitate conceptions (visualisations, imaginations) [in the minds], and these conceptions invite towards iraadaat (i.e. the desires, will, intent for something), and these iraadaat require the occurrence of the action. And the frequent repetition of the occurrence of this action, then leads to a habit.  Hence, the rectitude of all of these steps lies in the rectitude of the (initial) thoughts and ideas, and the corruption (of all these steps) lies in them also..

So understand this, and know that the directions taken by the likes of Abu Usamah and Abdul-Qadir and  others who associated with Salafiyyah for many years, but without grasping the true realities of the fitan  that were to come, and without giving due importance to the manaahij of the Salaf, was due to their general ignorance and lack of perception of historical realities and truths, and facts that pertained to the fitnah of Ikhwaaniyyah, in contemporary da’wah, and in the absence of this, they continued upon flawed perceptions till this day, and this perfectly explains the behaviour that is now emerging from them. Even if from certain angles they knew certain things, they missed the important perspectives by far and as Abu Usamah often speaks about “sophistication”, but unfortunately he himself lacks it, and was not able to grasp matters and gain clear, comprehensive thoughts with respect to them.

Instead of basing perceptions upon a comprehensive understanding of the Usool of the Salaf, the people who went astray did so because they had their perceptions built upon isolated events and occurrences. As an example, the Gulf War, or the fitnah of Safar and Salman, or the fitnah of Ihyaa at-Turaath or the fitnah of al-Ma’ribee. And this is what subsequently determined their behaviour and outlook. This is what we are seeing with Abu Usamah and Abdul-Qadir and their likes. Their mistake and error is known by the fact that this new wave of polemic that has come from them, only came after the fitnah of al-Ma’ribee, which shows that this is a new orientation they have brought that is newly arisen. But even though it is a new orientation, its roots can still be traced to the fitnahs that preceded it like that of Ar’oor and Shayijee and others.

As for the Salafees, then their manhaj has not changed, because their perceptions have not changed, because their perceptions were only ever based upon the Usool of the Manhaj of the Salaf, especially where the fitnah of al-Ikhwaan was concerned. Hence, there is consistency in their stances, their positions, the application of their principles, and this was uniform and remained the same for the fitnahs of Qutb, Safar and Salman, Suroor, Turaath, Ar’oor, Maghraawi and Ma’ribee.

The Salafees never changed, there was a natural progression in their views and stances in each of these fitnahs, because in reality, these fitnahs were all connected and stemmed from each other. So in reality, those who brought something new are the followers of al-Ma’ribee, and they know this themselves, because prior to the fitnah of al-Maghraawee and al-Ma’ribee all those who ascribed to Salafiyyah at large, were actually united upon the deviation of Ar’oor and Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq and Safar and Salman and ash-Shayijee and others, they all took the criticisms of the scholars, even if some were found who praised them, and they all knew that something of the manhaj of Ikhwaan was found with these people.

So the likes of Abu Usamah know this, and this is actually a hujjah upon them, to show that they are the ones who changed and they are the ones who brought something new, not the other way around. There is no natural progression in their Usool, rather this changed, as is clear. And they got affected, just like their predecessors from the followers of Safar and Salman, or Ar’oor got affected, and thereafter they still thought they were upon Salafiyyah when in reality the ideas and concepts and their general polemic was actually Ikwhaanee in essence. http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=14&Topic=1153 [End of quote]

So understand this well O Salafi! The above statement of Ustaadh Amjad regarding the Bid’ee shows that there is no drama between us and him. Rather after the proofs were establish against him through Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi’s (rahimahullaah) verdict, we only give him what he deserves- treating him just like we treat other obstinate and open callers to bidah principles. He is the one eager to see that Drama he craves for between us and him, whilst he thrives on attention by way of the false principles he upholds and the Mubtadi’ah he praises.

We do not play into his hands and end up having that drama he craves for between us and him; rather we make a clear distinction whilst making known why he is refuted and boycotted. Indeed if our affair with him was about the drama he claims, we would have ended up behaving like him in the takeaways and streets, for he seeks after physical fights with Salafis and uses obscene language against them. Therefore, the sensible person would have by now realised who in reality craves for that drama and acts in a manner that necessitates that drama!

And Allaah knows best

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

Continue Reading

Mindless Bid’ee [Abu Usaamah] Should Solely Bear The Burden of His Crimes And Refrain From Invoking The Curse of Allaah Against His Children In Seeking To Prove The Unprovable!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Firstly: The Salafiyyoon have witnessed the fact that Abu Usaama is a foul mouthed bid’ee and they have not allowed him to drag them to his level. The one with truth is not in need of such filth; rather such behaviour is a clear manifestation and expression of his weak intellect. He is a very frustrated bid’ee because whenever he attempts deceit, the Salafiyyoon expose him. Therefore, unless he starts accepting responsibility for his actions and sincerely accepts the fact that every single valid criticism against him is due to his actions, it will prove very difficult to repel that big ego by way which shaytaan makes him feel safe behind a wall of lies.

Secondly: Besides the fact that he is a foul mouthed bid’ee, he also goes into extremes in seeking to prove himself trustworthy, even though deception is his second skin. So whilst attempting to prove his trustworthiness, Abu Usaamah invokes the curse of Allaah against himself and his children! In 2004, he made an invocation that if he is lying, may Allaah curse him and his children, and cause them to die outside the fold of Islaam. He uttered this statement whilst seeking to make recantations (as he claimed); but since then his affair has become worse; for at present he openly cooperates with the worst of the hizbiyyoon – Ihyaa at- Turaath, Greenlane Masjid and their allies at al-Maghrib Institute.

So all that drama in 2004 to prove his truthfulness has shown no truthful actions regarding his stance towards the Mubtadi Al-Maribi, rather he has only increased in transgression- from finding excuses for the Ikhwani Mubtadi Al-Maribi, to finding excuses for the Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi and cooperating with the innovators of Ihyaa at-Turaath. This is his state of affairs in 2016 after invoking the curse of Allaah against himself and his children in 2004.

However, it is manifestly clear that he has not learnt a lesson, for recently he invoked the same curse again. He is solely responsible for his own deeds; so why include his children in such evil! He was the one who chose to defend Mubtadi’ah and was refuted, so why not take the responsibility on his own?

Thirdly: Do we see the scholars -[Shaikh Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, Shaikh Ibn Uthaymeen, Shaikh Albaani, Shaikh Fawzaan, Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Abdul Muhsin, Shaikh Abdul Azeez Aala Shaikh, Shaikh Luhaydaan, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi and others]- behaving in this manner?! No indeed!

Finally: Perhaps Abu Usaamah is so overwhelmed by his bidah that he is extremely oblivious of the evil he invokes against his children in order to prove the unprovable. We thought that by now his unsuspecting followers would have realised the foolishness of this man. Indeed, he is not absolved of accountability, unless it is known that he is mentally unstable. His desperate attempts at enforcing his rejection of the truth by invoking curses against his children will neither solve his problems nor cancel the unambiguous proofs against him.  How foolish, idiotic, short-sighted and evil of a man who knows that he is upon falsehood and is an established liar, yet he invokes the curse of Allaah against his children in order to prove his fraudulent stances. He should solely bear the burden of his crimes. We ask Allaah to protect his children.  Aameen.

 

Continue Reading

Location

Telephone

0161 317 1481

Address

2 Dudley Street
Cheetham Hill
Manchester
M8 9DA

(C) 2012 The Salafi Centre of Manchester | 2 Dudley Street, Cheetham Hill, Manchester, M8 9DA
The Quran and Sunnah Upon The Understanding of The Salaf

Pin It on Pinterest