Salaficentre Appeal 2019
  • Home
  • Abul Hasan al Maribee

Posts Tagged ‘Abul Hasan al Maribee’

If Ibnul Mubaarak [rahimahullaah] Was to Appear Amongst Us…. by Shaikh Jamaal Bin Fareehaan Al-Haarithi

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Ali Ibn Shaqeeq [rahimahullaah] said: I heard Abdullaah Ibnul Mubaarak  [rahimahullaah] saying in the midst of the people: ”Leave the narrations of the Amr Bin Thaabit because he used to revile the Salaf [i.e. the pious predecessors]”. [Muslim 1/16]

How about if Ibnul Mubaarak [rahimahullaah] was to appear amongst us [today]! What would he say about those who speak ill of the companions of the Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam], such as the likes of Mawdoodi, Sayyid Qutb, Taariq Suwaydaan, Hasan bin Farhaan al-Maaliki, Abul Hasan al-Maribi al-Misri and those who defend these people or keep silent about them!


[Source: لم الدر المنثور   by Shaikh Jamaal Bin Fareehaan Al-Haarithi page 143]

Continue Reading

Reminder: [Adherence to the Sound Sunni-Salafi Principles, Whilst  Exposing Deceptions of ‘The Staunch and Obstinate UK Supporters of the Murji Mubtadi Ali Halabi’ Continues- By the Tawfeeq of Allaah- Regardless Who Keeps Their Company]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Correct Stance towards the differing of the scholars concerning Jarh Wat-Tadeel

Question to Shaikh Ubaid Al-Jaabiri [may Allaah preserve him]:

If I heard the statement of a scholar in a cassette or read it in a book concerning some person that he is indeed an innovator, but I did not see the evidence, is it then binding upon me to be cautious of this person and be satisfied that he is indeed an innovator, or do I wait until I find evidence for that?

Answer:

All praise is due to Allaah the Lord of the Aalameen and may Allaah send His Salutations of peace and blessings upon our prophet Muhammad, his family and companions. To proceed: I say: Indeed Ahlus Sunnah do not pass judgement of Bidah (i.e. declare one to be from ahlul bidah) against anyone unless they are fully acquainted with him and completely examine what he is upon and know his methodology perfectly, in general and in detail. And from this point (in our discussion), this affair leads us to two standpoints:

The first standpoint: It is about the one against whom a scholar or scholars have passed a judgement that he is an innovator, whilst other scholars from Ahlus Sunnah like them do not differ (about this judgement). Beware, I say: Others from Ahlus Sunnah do not differ with them; so we accept their criticism against him (i.e. the one declared a man of bidah). We accept their speech and are cautious about him.  So as long as a Sunni Scholar passed judgement against him and he was criticised by a Sunni scholar, whilst the rest of Ahlus Sunnah amongst the contemporaries of this scholar–his brothers and sons amongst the scholars–did not raise (an opposition), then his  speech must be accepted.  That is because this Sunni Scholar who criticised a man did not do so except based on an affair that is clear to him and established upon proof.  This is something related to the religion of Allaah–the one who criticises or commends knows that he is responsible for what he says and for the ruling or judgement he gives. He knows that he is held accountable by Allaah (The Most High) even before the people question him.

The Second Standpoint: If this person who has been criticized by a scholar or scholars and they passed a judgement against him with what drops his status, and it became obligatory to be cautious of him; but then they are opposed by others who judged him to be trustworthy and that he is upon the Sunnah, or gave other judgements in opposition to the judgements of those other (scholars) who criticized him; then in this case, as long as these (scholars) and those (scholars) are upon the Sunnah and all of them are trustworthy and people of integrity in our view, we should look to the evidence. This is why they (i.e. the scholars) say: “The one who knows is a proof against the one who does not know.”

A criticizer who stated about such and such person that he is an innovator and a deviant, whilst producing evidence from the books of the criticized person or from his cassette tapes, or from the transmissions of the reliable narrators about him, then this obligates on us to accept his speech and abandon the (speech) of those who gave commendations in opposition to the one who criticized.  That is because those who criticized him presented evidences that are hidden from the others due some reasons, or due to the fact that the one who commended did not read or hear (anything or something negative) about the criticized; rather he based his commendation upon what he knew about him previously and that he was upon the Sunnah. Therefore, this criticized person against whom evidence is established is truly declared unreliable and the proof is with the one who established the evidence.  And it is incumbent upon the one who seeks the truth to follow the evidence and he does not seek to take a path to the right or the left, or saying: “I abstain of my own accord.” That is because we have not been obligated with this from the Salaf.  Indeed, it is a prescribed obligation to accept the speech of the one who established the evidence.  And the Sunni Scholar who opposed those who criticized (based on clear proofs) is excused and his status and honour are maintained in our eyes. We recognize what –by the will of Allaah–he possesses of virtue and exalted status.

A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only a human. He can be distracted and forgetful, and he can be deceived by evil people; or he used to consider a man to be trustworthy–who has now been declared untrustworthy–and he deceives him. The witnesses to this affair are many because many of those whose status has been dropped– due to being declared unreliable based on evidence–are in reality people who wage war against the Sunnah and its people.  So they come along with copies of their books and read it to the distinguished scholars–those considered to be people of leadership and virtue in the religion- whilst the affair of this trickster and plotter is hidden from that noble scholar, which had he known of it the status of this person would have dropped in his eyes. So this scholar gives praise based on what he heard. And if the book (of this trickster) is printed, it is disseminated and transmitted by his supporters and they spread a good reputation about him. Thus there are those who argue saying, “such and such praised him-Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) praised this book. However these scholars are excused; rather this trickster was hidden from that scholar.

So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this ‘deceiver, trickster and plotter’ based on what is found in his books.  We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech.” Therefore, it is obligated on you to be fair and to be free from that wild and zealous attachment, and from the desires that blinds a person. It is obligatory upon you that your search should be for the truth.

Question to Shaikh Ubaid [may Allaah preserve him]:

What is the obligation upon the common Salafis concerning those du’aat (callers) about whom the scholars differ in their commendations and criticisms, regardless whether they (i.e. the common Salafis) are aware or unaware of their mistakes (i.e. the mistakes of those callers)?

Answer:

I say: I advise you; neither accept cassettes nor books except those of a person whom you know to be upon the Sunnah and a witness of that is established for him—the one well-known to be upon the Sunnah and an opposition to it is not manifested from him. This is an (abiding) general principle applied to him whilst he is alive and after his death.  The one who passed away and we regarded him to be upon the Sunnah, then in our view he is upon the Sunnah and we ask Allaah to keep him firm upon it in the afterlife [i.e. Allaah grants him firmness to answer the questions in the grave due to adherence to the Sunnah (Tawheed and following the Messenger) and resurrects him in the afterlife as a person of Sunnah] just as he was kept firm upon it whilst he was alive…aameen. This is the first affair.

If the affair of a person is hidden from you–the one whose books and cassettes are famous and his fame is widespread–then ask those who are well acquainted with him and those who know about his state of affairs.  That is because neither is the Sunnah hidden nor are its people. A man’s Tazkiyah (i.e. the clear witness that he is upright upon the Sunnah) are his own actions. His Tazkiyah are his own actions that he is upon the Sunnah. It is the witness and the people mention him with it during his life and after his death.

There is none who hides behind the Sunnah– the people beguiled by him, gathered around him to learn, adhered to him, became dependent on him and accepted everything he said–except that Allaah will reveal his affair, uncover and expose his concealed state of affairs to specific individuals and to the general public, regarding what was hidden and apparent of his deception, his mixing truth with falsehood, his plots and deceitful practices.  Allaah facilitates men of virtue, intelligence, wisdom, strength and exceptional natural ability–possessors of knowledge, skill and sound understanding of the religion–through whom He (Allaah) unveils the affair of that trickster, dubious and deceitful person.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon you that when the state of that person is made clear–the one whose fame is widespread etc.–then you should be cautious of him as long as he was warned against by those people of knowledge and Imaan who are upon the Sunnah; for indeed they will unveil his affair with evidences.  And there is no hindrance in unveiling the state of that person who has been warned against by a scholar or scholars with the appropriate etiquettes and in a good manner because that scholar will say to you: “I saw this and that in him, and I saw this and that in the book of such and such, or I heard this or that in the cassette of such and such.” Therefore, you have clear evidence that will unveil what was hidden from you, and that the one whose fame is widespread and his speech is pleasant is one who hides something of innovation and plotting, which cannot be compared to what he manifests from the Sunnah.

The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow).


Slightly Paraphrased and Abridged. See Link: www.sahab.net/home/?p=329

Continue Reading

A Category of People Manifest Tamyee Stances From Time to Time – [A Brief Reminder to Our Salafi Brothers and Sisters At al-Markazus Salafi]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, Allaah- by His Great Mercy- made it possible for us to be united upon the sound Salafi Stances against the people of Bidah, Hizbiyyah and Tamyee – the sound stances taken against the staunch followers of Al-Maribi Al-Mubtadi, Al-Halabi Al-Mubtadi and Al-Maghraawi Al-Mubtadi at Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill) and elsewhere, and the followers of Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Mubtadi and the followers of Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli.

Indeed, a clear distinction has been made -by the scholars -between the Salafiyyoon and those affiliated to the people of Bidah, Hizbiyyah and Tamyee. This is pleasing to every Salafi, however amazing is the affair of those who still refuse to apply –precisely- what our scholars have advised us in relation to the sound Salafi stances we must take against the staunch followers of the deviants mentioned above and their staunch followers in the UK and elsewhere.

All praise is due to Allaah, for indeed the verdicts of the scholars are detailed and unambiguous – clear to all the Salafiyyoon by the Tawfeeq of Allaah. However, there are people -appearing from time o time- who are anxious to lose friendships. It is amazing when they intentionally conceal advice through which others can be guided by the Tawfeeq of Allaah! It is amazing that they never cease to sit on the fence and are quick to get angry when those who appease Ahlul Bidah are criticised on the Minbar! It is amazing that they are quick to find excuses for the people of Tamyee and quick to criticise those who apply the verdicts of the scholars precisely! It is amazing how they ponder upon the best plan- whilst staying close by – to weaken the stances taken by the brothers and sisters against the people of bidah, Hizbiyyah and Tamyee, even though the scholars have made a very clear distinction – by way of detailed unambiguous knowledge based proofs- between the Salafiyyoon and the Hizbiyyoon of Manchester, and elsewhere.

Amazing is the affair of these people who still cannot come to terms with the facts! Amazing is the affair of these people who have apprehensive fear when the people of Bidah and Hizbiyyah are mentioned on the Minbar, but they show little of it when criticising the Salafiyyoon – those who firmly adhere to the unambiguous knowledge base proofs produced by the scholars and their students against the people of bidah, hizbiyyah and tamyee! Amazing indeed is the affair these people, who accompany those who intentionally accompany the Hizbiyyoon, even after being aware of the verdicts of the scholars and the efforts of the UK students in clarifying the sound Manhaj stances. We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat, Sidq and Husnul Khaatimah Aameen

Abu AbeeBakr [Abdullah Jallow (Al-Gambi)]

Reminders:

http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/06/verdict-upon-masjid-as-sunnah-committee-in-manchester-shaikh-rabees-tele-link-in-2003-2/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/01/ahlul-bidah-are-the-ones-who-kindle-trials-and-disorder-by-shaikh-shamsuddeen-al-afghaani-as-salafi/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/03/whoever-sits-with-ahlul-bidah-is-not-safe-from-one-of-three-affairs-imaam-sufyaan-ath-thawri/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2013/12/the-mumayyioon-pose-a-more-severe-danger-to-ahlus-sunnah-shaikh-muhammad-bin-haadi/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/12/who-is-this-dangerous-category-of-people-mentioned-by-shaikh-rabee/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/11/reminder-shaikh-rabee-says-whenever-the-desires-increase-it-becomes-necessary-upon-the-people-of-truth-to-increase-in-acquainting-themselves-with-the-truth/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/12/shaikh-rabee-said-the-people-of-baatil-do-not-remain-silent-yet-they-demand-silence-from-ahlul-haqq/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/a-sign-of-the-hearts-hardness-shaikh-rabee-said/

 

Continue Reading

He Clung to His Books and Ignored The Scholars, So He Went Astray!

Abdullaah narrated from his father Imaam Ahmad who said: ”If a person has written works (by the scholars) in which is contained the statements of Allaah’s Messenger  (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam), the differences of opinion between the Sahaabah and the Taabi’een, it is not permissible for him to act upon what he wants, choose (what he wants), judge by it and act upon it until he asks the people of knowledge  (i.e. the scholars) regarding what to take from it, so that he can act upon what is sound.” [Source: I’laam Al-Muwaqqi’een 2/84]

This above statement of Imaam Ahmad (rahimahullaah) reminds us of a head amongst the Hizbiyyoon, whom the Imaam at Al-Markazus Salafi [Kamaal – Imaadud-deen (may Allaah preserve him)] told to refer to the scholars during the fitnah of Abul Hasan al-Maribi, so the hizbi said: ‘’I have a library and can search for the truth’’. We seek Allaah’s protection from misguidance Aameen.


 

Continue Reading

Doubt Rebutted: The Brothers at SP Do Not Follow Some of The Scholars’ by Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah

Question: Can you give us a clarification about the statement of some of the people, who say that, the brothers at al Maktabahtus Salafiyyah do not follow some of the Scholars…

http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

 

Continue Reading

Conclusion: A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

This is the final post regarding the affair of the Bid’ee [Abu Usaama] but we will return InShaaAllaah whenever the Bid’ee attempts to defile the Salafi Manhaj.

The Bid’ee places himself as on the side of the “so called moderates’’ while those who question this corrupt moderation with clear proofs are a people who exceed the limits! Greenlane’s Admin invites deviant speakers from Al-Maghrib Institute and Ihyaa At-Turaath, whilst the Bid’ee provides flimsy cover for their Hizbiyyah. One is immediately placed in the ‘Ghulaat Register’ by the Bid’ee when his and Greenlane’s corrupt alliances are critically questioned based on what the Salafi Manhaj necessitates. On the other hand, one is considered a moderate when he accommodates those people of bidah who are close to the Bid’ee and Greenlane’s Admin – a corrupt trait of the ‘Hizbi Enterprise.’

In a sign of increasing frustration, the Bid’ee always deceives when seeking to aid Greenlane’s Admin after a series of devastating refutations against them by the students at Salafipublications (may Allaah preserve them). [Visit Salafis.Com | The Salafi Call and Methodology and read articles titled: The Conference of Greenlane Lane Mosque (Singers and Ikhwanis)]

Likewise, the Bid’ee’s employers at Greenlane invite speakers to help them conceal their crimes against the Salafi Manhaj, side by side with Dr Ali Shibl, telling unsuspecting listeners that they should not lend an ear to those who refute Greenlane’s Admin. They invited a number of foreign speakers to conceal their true state of affairs, but to no avail. These were desperate tactics that neither distracted the Salafiyyoon nor weakened their resolve by the Tawfeeq of Allaah.

The Bid’ee is happy to carry on being the disgraced ring leader of the ‘Hizbi Advocacy Service’. As the main public stuntman of Greenlane’s Admin, he has spent quite a few years specialising in Hizbiyyah and deception- the ‘prime mover’ and ‘essential cog’ in the ‘Joint Hizbi Enterprise’. His usual last-ditch attempt to win the sympathy of his unsuspecting followers has always been, ‘’Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbaad does not see that Al-Maribi is a Mubtadi’’. The reader is strongly advised to read the article in this link http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/09/why-shaikh-rabee-was-correct-and-shaikh-abdul-muhsin-was-wrong-yet-both-are-rewarded/ because it destroys this deceitful argument utilised by the Bid’ee in order to downplay the affair of a dangerous and vile Mubtadi. Also listen here: http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat and Husnul Khaatimah

———————————————————————————————————

A Series in Response to Abu Usama’s Habitual Deceitfulness

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/mindless-bidee-abu-usaamah-should-solely-bear-the-burden-of-his-crimes-and-refrain-from-invoking-the-curse-of-allaah-against-his-children-in-seeking-to-prove-the-unprovable/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/1-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/2-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses-examining-another-recent-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/3-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-call-to-truthfulness-amid-his-past-and-present-track-record-of-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/4-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-claim-that-we-are-from-those-rough-tough-people/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/5-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamss-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-he-deceitfully-refrained-from-explaining-and-stating-the-scholarly-restrictions-regarding-the-principl/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/6-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-the-false-claim-that-there-is-that-drama-between-us-and-him/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/7-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-a-precise-observation-by-ustaadh-abu-uwais-rahimahullaah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/8-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-motivated-by-deep-malice-he-made-a-fruitless-and-desperate-attempt-to-prove-that-we-follow-a-shaikh-who-is-upon-bidah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/9-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-malicious-speculation-and-desperate-scapegotery/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/10-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-keyboard-warriors-the-bidee-is-wilfully-oblivious-of-the-fact-that-words-and-terms-have-to-match-behaviour/

[11] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness-[SP’s Salafiyyah Is a Great Source of Heartache, Grief and Anxiety For The Bid’ee!]

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Location

Telephone

0161 317 1481

Address

2 Dudley Street
Cheetham Hill
Manchester
M8 9DA

(C) 2012 The Salafi Centre of Manchester | 2 Dudley Street, Cheetham Hill, Manchester, M8 9DA
The Quran and Sunnah Upon The Understanding of The Salaf

Pin It on Pinterest