Tag: Adnaan Ar’oor

Part 2: Observations on Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli (may Allaah rectify his affairs) stated that he advices the youth of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah to solve their differences based on what is found in the Book and the Sunnah. They should also utilise what is found in it to solve the great splitting that has occurred due to differing- which many of the Salafi youth are upon in the Muslim lands, rather even in the non-Muslim countries where the Muslims are the smallest group- in the affairs of knowledge, the stances towards some of the Mukhaalifeen, which has led to shunning and boycotting (one another), rather this has even led to violating the rights of others and transgression between Ahlus Sunnah until the fitnah has become great, severely dangerous and has affected the dawah to the Sunnah, rather it has prevented some people from embracing the Dawah after the people accepted it in many regions and countries.

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) responded to the above statement of Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli, saying that it was incumbent upon Dr Ibraaheem (may Allaah rectify his affairs) to know the reasons behind the differing between the Salafi youth and those who ascribe themselves to it, then come out openly with the truth and convict those splitters (or dividers) of the salafi youth,- those who innovate corrupt principles to defend the people of bidah and misguidance– refute their corrupt principles, fundamentals and misguided methodologies; refute their defence of the people of bidah and misguidance, their war against Ahlus Sunnah, their (attempts) to defame  the methodology of ahlus sunnah and their scholars.

Then Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) went on to say that it was incumbent upon Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli to specify those who have violated the rights of others and the transgressors – those who brought about great trial and whose affair is of severe danger due to initiating and prolonging this fitnah through deceptive methods and false principles, which they have set up to destroy the methodology of Ahlus Sunnah and bring down the scholars.

Many of the people have been duped (or deceived) by these deceptive methods, false alarms and fundamentals whose aim is to reject truth and misguide the people, for they have brought about great trial and severe danger. And from the consequences of this (great trial and severe danger initiated by those who set up these false alarms, principles and fundamentals) is that many from Ahlus Sunnah deviated and many people fled from the Manhaj of Ahlus Sunnah after accepting it. So as a matter of fact, it becomes known who is the cause of the fitnah upon the Salafi Dawah, which (i.e. this trial) brought about trials and splitting.

So clarification is a necessity in sincere advice, for sincere advice and clarification are from the most important affairs that the Messengers were sent with. Allaah (The Most High) said that His Prophet Nuh (alayhis-salaatu wassalaam) said:

[أُبَلِّغُكُمْ رِسَالَاتِ رَبِّي وَأَنصَحُ لَكُمْ وَأَعْلَمُ مِنَ اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ – I convey unto you the Messages of my Lord and give sincere advice to you. And I know from Allah what you know not (7:62)]

And Allaah (The Most High) said that His Prophet Hud (alayhis salaatu Was-Salaam) said:

[أُبَلِّغُكُمْ رِسَالَاتِ رَبِّي وَأَنَا لَكُمْ نَاصِحٌ أَمِينٌ – I convey unto you the Messages of my Lord, and I am a trustworthy adviser (or well-wisher) for you (7:68)]

And Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن رَّسُولٍ إِلَّا بِلِسَانِ قَوْمِهِ لِيُبَيِّنَ لَهُمْ ۖ فَيُضِلُّ اللَّهُ مَن يَشَاءُ وَيَهْدِي مَن يَشَاءُ ۚ وَهُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الْحَكِيمُ

And We sent not a Messenger except with the language of his people, in order that he might make (the Message) clear for them. Then Allah misleads whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.[14:4] The scholars are the inheritors of the prophets in this advice, clarification and other than it.

Then Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) informed Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli that if this obligatory legislated clarification is not received from him [i.e. from Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli (may Allaah rectify his affairs)], he (i.e. Shaikh Rabee) sees that it is incumbent upon him (Shaikh Rabee) to fulfil it as Naseehah to Islaam (i.e. doing what Islaam requires in this particular affair in order establish what it sanctions and repel what it negates in order that the sound principles in the religion are preserved) and sincere advice to the Muslims (i.e. to give sincere advice to the Muslims about what is correct and informing them of what is harmful to their religion in this particular affair).

Then Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) said,  I say: The figureheads of this trial, its initiators (or perpetrators) and flag bearers are well known to Ahlus Sunnah, and they are indeed Adnaan Ar’oor, Abul Hasan al Maribi, Ali al Halabi and those who follow them, their principles and methodology. These people pursue their war against Ahlus Sunnah and their defence of the senior people of bidah.

The Shaikh then went on to speak about Al-Qaasimi, who was a typical example of those who defended the senior people of bidah just as Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi and Adnaan Ar’oor are guilty of the same affair. [Source: Bayaan Maa Fee Naseehati Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli Minal Khalal Wal Ikh’laal pages 8-20 paraphrased and abridged]

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah


Abul Hasan Al-Maribi


Ali  Al-Halabi












Adnaan Ar’oor



Greenlane’s Admin: Shaikh Uthaymeen and six other scholars unveil the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor; why do you hide truth & aggrandize status of those who defend him?!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Uthaymeen refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) unveils the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi






Shaikh Gudiyaan (rahimahullaah) refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Zayd Bin Haadi (rahimahullaah) refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi






Shaikh Ubayd Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him)

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

Part 3: Ali Halabi’s Long Journey

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Ali Halabi’s Unsteady Stance towards Passing Judgments on Individuals and Deviants

[Adnaan Ar’oor and Muhammad Al-Maghraawi]

Discussion in pages 16-20 in the Arabic PDF. Download PDF here:


Before the death of the three Mashaa-yikh [i.e. Imaam Bin Baaz, Imaam Al-Albaanee and Imaam Muhammad Ibn Uthaymeen(rahimahumullaah)], Adnaan Ar’oor together with his companion Ahmad Sallaam newly invented a number of principles and fundamentals in the affair of passing judgements against individuals and the manner of dealing with the Mukhaalifoon. And for that reason, they embarked upon a number of seminars and study sessions in order to attract the salafi youth in Britain and other than it, and they called them to accept those false principles.

In their gatherings, they raised objections against Shaikh Rabee’s methodology of criticism, refutation, his stances towards the one in opposition and in the science Jarh Wat-Tadeel. They warned the youth against the methodology which they described as extreme, excessive harshness and defamation. They defended Sayyid Qutb and portrayed him to the youth as one of the best amongst those who spoke in the (affairs) of Manhaj. Shaikh Rabee opposed them and clarified the corruption of their principles and methodology and the falsity of their fundamentals and what they advocated. So they were infuriated and announced a fierce battle against Shaikh Rabee. This affair was the beginning of the Fitnah of these people and not what some think due to ignorance and deceit, that it was Shaikh Rabee who initiated the Fitnah and war with these ones.

And through a number of deceptive ways, Adnaan Ar’oor attempted to obtain the statements of the three Mashaa-yikh (Imaam Bin Baaz, Imaam Al-Albaanee and Imaam Ibn Uthaymeen) to support his falsehood and dispraise the methodology Shaikh Rabee was defending. He (Adnaan) did not reach what he wanted, because the scholars realised his plots and tricks.

And it was transmitted in a statement of Imaad Taariq Al-Iraaqee in the internet forum Kullu As-Salafiyyeen, which is under Ali Halabi’s supervision: [The Stance of our Imaam Al-Albaanee Towards Shaikh Rabee Al-Madkhali’s Refutation Against Adnaan Ar’oor, transmitted by our shaikh Ali Al-Halabi]; Imaad said: I came across a section from the speech of our Shaikh Al-Halabi in which he transmitted the stance of Shaikh Al-Albaanee towards Shaikh Rabee’s reproach against Adnaan, that when I (Ali Halabi) mentioned some of Shaikh Rabee’s proofs against Adnaan to Shaikh Al-Albaanee and Adnaan reply, he (i.e. Shaikh Al-Albaanee) said: These affairs are true, it is incumbent upon Adnaan to reply to them with clarity, and abstract speech is not enough or merely saying this is general and that is detailed and this is all inclusive and that is specific and so on, this neither rectifies nor is it of benefit in the likes of this affair.