Salaficentre Appeal 2019

Posts Tagged ‘Ali Al-Halabi’

Doubt Rebutted: The Brothers at SP Do Not Follow Some of The Scholars’ by Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah

Question: Can you give us a clarification about the statement of some of the people, who say that, the brothers at al Maktabahtus Salafiyyah do not follow some of the Scholars…

http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

 

Continue Reading

Conclusion: A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

This is the final post regarding the affair of the Bid’ee [Abu Usaama] but we will return InShaaAllaah whenever the Bid’ee attempts to defile the Salafi Manhaj.

The Bid’ee places himself as on the side of the “so called moderates’’ while those who question this corrupt moderation with clear proofs are a people who exceed the limits! Greenlane’s Admin invites deviant speakers from Al-Maghrib Institute and Ihyaa At-Turaath, whilst the Bid’ee provides flimsy cover for their Hizbiyyah. One is immediately placed in the ‘Ghulaat Register’ by the Bid’ee when his and Greenlane’s corrupt alliances are critically questioned based on what the Salafi Manhaj necessitates. On the other hand, one is considered a moderate when he accommodates those people of bidah who are close to the Bid’ee and Greenlane’s Admin – a corrupt trait of the ‘Hizbi Enterprise.’

In a sign of increasing frustration, the Bid’ee always deceives when seeking to aid Greenlane’s Admin after a series of devastating refutations against them by the students at Salafipublications (may Allaah preserve them). [Visit Salafis.Com | The Salafi Call and Methodology and read articles titled: The Conference of Greenlane Lane Mosque (Singers and Ikhwanis)]

Likewise, the Bid’ee’s employers at Greenlane invite speakers to help them conceal their crimes against the Salafi Manhaj, side by side with Dr Ali Shibl, telling unsuspecting listeners that they should not lend an ear to those who refute Greenlane’s Admin. They invited a number of foreign speakers to conceal their true state of affairs, but to no avail. These were desperate tactics that neither distracted the Salafiyyoon nor weakened their resolve by the Tawfeeq of Allaah.

The Bid’ee is happy to carry on being the disgraced ring leader of the ‘Hizbi Advocacy Service’. As the main public stuntman of Greenlane’s Admin, he has spent quite a few years specialising in Hizbiyyah and deception- the ‘prime mover’ and ‘essential cog’ in the ‘Joint Hizbi Enterprise’. His usual last-ditch attempt to win the sympathy of his unsuspecting followers has always been, ‘’Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbaad does not see that Al-Maribi is a Mubtadi’’. The reader is strongly advised to read the article in this link http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/09/why-shaikh-rabee-was-correct-and-shaikh-abdul-muhsin-was-wrong-yet-both-are-rewarded/ because it destroys this deceitful argument utilised by the Bid’ee in order to downplay the affair of a dangerous and vile Mubtadi. Also listen here: http://www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-brothers-at-sp-do-not-follow-some-of-the-scholars-by-abu-khadeejah/

We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat and Husnul Khaatimah

———————————————————————————————————

A Series in Response to Abu Usama’s Habitual Deceitfulness

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/mindless-bidee-abu-usaamah-should-solely-bear-the-burden-of-his-crimes-and-refrain-from-invoking-the-curse-of-allaah-against-his-children-in-seeking-to-prove-the-unprovable/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/1-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/2-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-and-addictive-deceitful-responses-examining-another-recent-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/3-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-call-to-truthfulness-amid-his-past-and-present-track-record-of-deception/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/4-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-his-recent-claim-that-we-are-from-those-rough-tough-people/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/5-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamss-habitual-deceitfulness-and-deceitful-responses-he-deceitfully-refrained-from-explaining-and-stating-the-scholarly-restrictions-regarding-the-principl/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/6-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-the-false-claim-that-there-is-that-drama-between-us-and-him/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/7-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-a-precise-observation-by-ustaadh-abu-uwais-rahimahullaah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/8-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-motivated-by-deep-malice-he-made-a-fruitless-and-desperate-attempt-to-prove-that-we-follow-a-shaikh-who-is-upon-bidah/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/9-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-malicious-speculation-and-desperate-scapegotery/

http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/10-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-keyboard-warriors-the-bidee-is-wilfully-oblivious-of-the-fact-that-words-and-terms-have-to-match-behaviour/

[11] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness-[SP’s Salafiyyah Is a Great Source of Heartache, Grief and Anxiety For The Bid’ee!]

 

 

 

Continue Reading

ABU USAAMAH TAKES HIS CUT & PASTE METHODOLOGY FROM HIS INNOVATOR SHAYKH ALI HASAN AL-HALABI

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Traits of An Innovator: Ali Al-Halabi’s Cutting off Speech,  Playing About with it and Distorting it’s Meanings. Abu Usaamah himself said about Ali Al-Halabi – “ I am a supporter of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi. I support him. I support what he is upon.”1.

Ali Al-Halabi is known for his cutting off speech, adding to it and distorting it, in order to support his corrupt principles. An example of this which follows is his cutting from the speech of Imaam Abdur-Rahmaan As-Sa’di (rahimahullah). Here let us first present to the reader the original text from the Imaam himself, before any distortions were added by Al-Halabi. Once the reader acquaints himself with such trickery then this is in reality enough (a reason) to bring Al-Halabi down and warn against him!

A specimen of the complete speech of Imaam Sa’di from Ar-riyaad An-Naadhirah' page 209 ^^^

A specimen of the complete speech of Imaam Sa’di from Ar-riyaad An-Naadhirah’ page 209 ^^^

من الغلط الفاحش الخطر قبول قول الناس بعضهم ببعض، ثم يبنى عليه السامع حبا أو بغضا، ومدحا وذما؛ فكم حصل بهذا الغلط من أمور صار عاقبتها الندامة، وكم أشاع الناس عن الناس أمورا لا حقيقة لها بالكلية، أو لها بعض الحقيقة فنميت بالكذب والزور، وخصوصا ممن عرفوا بعدم المبالاة بالنقل، أو عرف منهم الهوى.

فالواجب على العاقل التثبت والتحرز، وعدم التسرع.

وبهذا يعرف دين المرء ورزانته وعقله

Imaam as Sa’di (rahimahullah) said in the above that (slightly paraphrased) “from the repugnant dangerous mistakes is when people accept one another’s speech, then the one who hears that speech establishes love, hate, praise and dispraise based on that”. Then the Imaam further stated that “how many mistakes have been committed [through this behaviour] regarding affairs whose end result became a matter of regret?!  And how many affairs have been spread by people from other people which are complete unreality?! Or it has some reality, so lies and falsehood are added to it, especially those known for not having concern regarding what they narrate, or known for following desires. Therefore, it is obligated on an ‘aaqil (a sensible person with sound reasoning and intellect) that he ascertains, takes precaution and not to be hasty. And by way of this, the religion of a person is known [i.e. the soundness of his path], his composure and ‘aql [sound reasoning or intellect]”

So the above statement is an example of that which was doctored by Al-Halabi purposely to suit his own agenda and methodology. Ali Al-Halabi transmitted a cut down version, in his book [Manhajus Salafus Saaleh’ 2nd Edition’ page 229] from the statement of Imaam Abdur-Rahmaan As-Sadi (rahimahullaah) as follows:

 من الغلط الفاحش الخطر قبول قول الناس بعضهم ببعض، ثم يبنى عليه السامع حبا أو بغضا، ومدحا وذما؛ فكم حصل بهذا الغلط من

 أمور صار عاقبتها الندامة، وكم أشاع الناس عن الناس أمورا لا حقيقة لها بالكلية،

 فالواجب على العاقل التثبت والتحرز، وعدم التسرع.

وبهذا يعرف دين المرء ورزانته وعقله

Specimen of halabis doctored version

Specimen of halabis doctored version

So based on the above version (transmitted by Al-Halabi Al-Mubtadi), it means that the Imaam said “from the repugnant dangerous mistakes is when people accept one another’s speech, then the one who hears that speech establishes love, hate, praise and dispraise based on that”; then he [Halabi] went on to complete it with “how many mistakes have been committed (through this behaviour) regarding affairs whose end result became a matter of regret?!  And how many affairs have been spread by people from other people which are a complete unreality?! Therefore, it is obligated on an aaqil (i.e. a sensible person of intellect) that he ascertains, takes precaution and not to be hasty. And by way of this, the religion of a person is known (i.e. soundness of his path), his composure and aql (sound reasoning or intellect).

After Ali Al-Halabi transmitted this statement, he commented, saying: “Be careful, may Allaah protect you; the Shaikh (i.e. Imaam Sadi) did not distinguish in this warning regarding accepting from a thiqah (a reliable person) and ghayr thiqah (an unreliable person)! Indicating to the mistake that may occur even from a reliable person; and the مفاسد  (corrupt affairs), محن  (adversities, trials ordeals etc),  بلاء  (affliction) and  إحن  (enmity, rancour, malice arises from some affair) that results from it. (See specimen on next page)

 

Specimen of Halabis comments >  

Specimen of Halabis comments

Dear Reader take note! Halabi purposely cut out from the speech of Imaam As-Sadi in order to confuse the reader. The principle utilised by ahlus-Sunnah is that we accept the news given by the one who is thiqah (the trustworthy, reliable person) without the need to verify or check the statement. Halabi wants to distort and change this principle and so purposely omits the following sentence:

[و لها بعض الحقيقة فنميت بالكذب والزور، وخصوصا ممن عرفوا بعدم المبالاة بالنقل، أو عرف منهم الهوى –

Or it has some reality, so lies and falsehood are added to it, especially those known for not having concern regarding what they narrate, or known for following desires.”

So why is it omitted? Because if he were to include the full statement, it would no longer give credence to his own innovated principle of “having to verify from everyone – thiq’a (trustworthy) or ghayr thiq’a (non trustworthy)”. Furthermore he makes manifest his own innovated principle, as part of his notes, in order to pollute the reader’s thinking into holding that you “must check and verify the statements of a thiqa’ person”, in the same way you must verify one who isn’t thiqa’. This is in contradiction to even how Imaam as-Sa’di(rahimahullah) presented it, as he was making clear to the reader to beware those who are untrustworthy- not trustworthy.

So let us see what Imaam Sadi (rahimahullaah) stated regarding the news given by a faasiq (open sinner) and a truthful person. Allaah (The Most High) said: “O you who believe! If a faasiq comes to you with news, verify it.”

Imaam Sadi commented on this ayah saying:

“This is also from the etiquettes expected from those of understanding to adorn themselves with and implement. And that when a faasiq informs them of some news, they [should] verify the news he transmits (to them) and don’t just simply accept it; for indeed there is a grave danger in that and [risk] of falling into sin. Because if his news is made the same as that of a truthful upright person, the decision is made in accordance with that and what it necessitates. Then lost of lives and wealth occurs without due right due to that information, resulting in regret.

Rather what it is obligatory is that when a faasiq transmits news, it is verified and clarified. If the proofs and supporting factors affirm his truthfulness, it is acted upon and believed. And if they indicate to falsehood, it is declared false and not acted upon.

So in this is a proof that the news [transmitted by] the truthful one is accepted and the news from the liar rejected, while the news from a faasiq is (temporarily) suspended as we have mentioned, and that is why the Salaf would accept narrations from many of those (particular) khawaarij who were well known to be truthful, even if they were wicked sinners.”

Abu Usaamah’s Similar deceitful, cutting, pasting & doctoring to suit his own agenda- Live on stage! A Mirror of the Above from Halabi…

In 2010 Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi carried out a similar action, whereby he added to the words of Shaikh Sadlaan during a tele-link. This is an imitation of his mubtadi Shaykh Ali Al Halabi—about whom Abu Usamah himself said (in his feeble video defence when ending up in the wrong masjid):

I am a supporter of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi. I support him. I support what he is upon. His mistakes we put that aside. I say that in public and I say that in private.

Ustaadh Abdulilah Lahmami (may Allaah preserve him) caught him at the time, writing:

“Then Abu Usama Khalifah added in the translation that Sheikh Rabee’ should stop “cursing the dead people… “Due to a hadeeth of the Prophet salallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam mentioning this. This addition was not mentioned by Sheikh Sadlan in the Arabic so take note.”

So once again, Abu Usaamah was caught out, adding to the speech of the Shaykh in order to cause confusion, and fitnah; and spread rancour in the hearts of the people toward Shaykh Rabee’ (hafidhahullah)- and this due to nothing except, that which burns inside him, against the noble Shaykh; and the Salafis as a whole. Ustaadh Abdulilah (may Allaah preserve him) also said:

“After visiting Sheikh Rabee’ ibn Haadi Al-Madkhali this weekend, he added that one should clarify to the people that he does not curse the dead (as Abu Usama khalifah added) and likewise to make mention that the scholars have always refuted the errors of those who have erred. Likewise, these refutations are a mercy for the dead so that people don’t follow them in their errors.’’2

Here we remind you again the statement of Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool: “And whenever you find the statement of a muhaqqiq scholar being utilized as proof by a person of bid’ah and falsehood in seeking to establish his falsehood; and you refer that statement back to its original source- you will not find except that this (person of falsehood) did cut off and separate some part of it from another part.’’3

And so we can see that the bid’ee Abu Usaamah is just a mirror of his innovator Shaykh Ali Hassan Al-Halabi. There is no difference in their methodology! This is affirmed by Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi’s own statements as quoted before; as well as his actions, wherein both have been caught twisting speech of the Scholars of truth and Sunnah, in order to suit their agenda and ideology that they want to promote.

It is important that the noble reader is made aware of such sneaky trickery, lest they be taken in by their speech, and be taken astray, and with Allah is the success.


 

1: His Youtube Response (link)
2: For further details see link: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=10356
3: Wasaa’l Ahlil Baatil Fee Taqreeri Baatilihim’ page: 63

Continue Reading

[11] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness-[SP’s Salafiyyah Is a Great Source of Heartache, Grief and Anxiety For The Bid’ee!]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his deceptive response to the Friday incident at al-Markazus Salafi, the Bid’ee attacked our beloved teachers, elders and brothers at SP, as usual accusing them of Ghuloo. We have already replied to the Bid’ee’s slander that we are upon a bidah principle –[Link: http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/8-a-series-in-response-to-abu-usaamas-habitual-deceitfulness-motivated-by-deep-malice-he-made-a-fruitless-and-desperate-attempt-to-prove-that-we-follow-a-shaikh-who-is-upon-bidah/] and now we will briefly make known why the Bid’ee hates the students and elders at SP.

Indeed, the malice and hatred harboured by the Bid’ee against the Salafiyoon at SP is due to nothing else other than the fact that they repel his lowly desires and corrupt hizbi ambitions. Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghani (rahimahullaah) said:  ”Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle trials and disorder.  They are a chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of trials and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan (i.e. those who steadfastly follow the ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah). Have they (i.e. the people of Sunnah) committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass- alongside enmity and innovation- whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion)”. [Source: عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية 1/26-27]

The Bid’ee cannot come to terms with the fact that SP – by the Mercy and Tawfeeq of Allaah- have remained steadfast, neither compromising with Mubtadi’ah nor their obstinate followers; rather they continue to transmit the sound Aqeedah and Manhaj from the scholars. He cannot come to terms with the fact his continued public stunts -in order to slander SP- has always met failure. And among those  incidents was Shaikh Wasiyullah’s first visited to the Uk, Shaikh Sadlaan’s visit, the different attempts to entice speakers from Saudi, such as Dr Ali Shibl to beautify Greenlane’s ugly affair etc. All these public stunts failed miserably because SP held onto the sound Manhaj positions, for regardless who visits Greenlane’s Admin or speaks good of them, their hizbiyyah still manifests itself like the midday sun. How can an Admin that cooperate with the people of Bidah [at Ihyaa at-Turaath, al-Maghrib Institute and other deviants] be benefitted by any praise?! A person is judged based on what he is upon, so listen to the clarification here: http://safeshare.tv/v/bWPR3Eacn4k

SP did not compromise with anyone, but the Bid’ee compromised and thus ended up in the fitnah of the Mubtadi’ah, the people of Bidah, the hizbiyyoon, the Mu’mayyi’oon – be it Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi, Ihyaa at-Turaath etc Rather, the Bid’ee has even defended Ismaeel Menk – a deobandi. See refutation of Ismaaeel-Menk:http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/who-is-mufti-menk/    http://safeshare.tv/v/ss570a54c03bd31

The Bid’ee beautifies the filth of these people of bidah; yet SP are the Ghulaat! This is the despicable opinion of this spiteful transgressor against those who are foremost in bringing clarity in the West, and continue to do so by the permission and Tawfeeq of Allaah (The Most High). These are the Ghulaat, according to Abu Usaama, because they expose his lowly desires, repel his crimes against the Salafi Manhaj and unveil the malicious insinuations of his mentors.  None trusts or entertains this spiteful transgressor except those who employ him at Greenlane to do their dirty job or those who are unaware of his true state of affairs. As for his unsuspecting followers, there is nothing that describes his relationship with them better than the saying: ‘’The trust of the innocent is the liar’s most useful tool.’’

As for the Salafiyyoon, he attempts to stab them with his bidah, deceptions and doubts, but when caught he cuts himself – bleeding and playing the victim game. This is why whenever he seeks to deceive and gets caught, he screams ‘the Ghulaat!’  This behaviour is nothing else but a painful manifestation of frustration because the Salafiyyoon already know that his lies and deceptions are underpinned by an unquestionable acquaintance with the truth he wishes to hide or distort.

The Salafiyyoon know that his perverse and strong desire to slander them is underpinned by nothing else but unjustified vengeance –  stop destroying my plots against the sound Manhaj positions or else I will slander you!!! This is what his actions and statements necessitate; so if what he hides is worse than what he manifests- and only Allaah knows this- then may Allaah open his heart to guidance or give the spiteful transgressor what he deserves. Aameen

The Manhaj of SP is clear and there are no ambiguities in the affair, so ask yourselves the following questions:

*Does Abu Khadeejah, Abu Hakeem and Maktabah Salafiyyah defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi? No indeed; rather it is the bid’ee who promotes Mubtadiah!

*Do they have any links with a single Mubtadi or an organization that defends Mubtadi’ah? Do they co-operate with the Jamaa’aat Siyaasiyah or those who co-operate with such Jamaa’aat? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who cooperates with Ihyaa at-Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute and others!

*Do they co-operate with ahlul bidah wal-ahwaa or anyone associated with them? No indeed; rather it is the bid’ee who promotes and defends the deobandi Ismaaeel Menk!

*Do they promote the innovated principles of Hasan Al-Banna and Ikhwaan al muslimeen, or associate with anyone who does so? No indeed; rather it is Bid’ee who praises al-Maribi (an upholder of ikhwaani principles)!

*Do they uphold the false Manhaj of Muwaazanah or associate with anyone who promotes such false principles? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises Al-Maribi (an upholder of Muwaazanaat)!

*Do they defend Sayyid Qutb or co-operate with anyone who defends him? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who sits with Ihyaa at-Turaath (sympathisers of Sayyid)!

*Do they endorse the false principles: “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ and “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing among ourselves?’’ No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who defends and supports Ali al-Halabi (an upholder of these false principles)!

*Do they make a differentiation between Aqeedah and Manhaj when the scholars pass judgements against the people of bidah, or do they have a link with anyone who calls to these false principles? No indeed; rather their websites are filled with clarifications regarding this important affair!

*Do they hold the false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah, or do they have a link with anyone who holds this false view? No indeed; they have no link with any of these people!

*Do they revile the Sahaabah and defend those who call them Ghuthaa-iyyah, or co-operate with anyone who defends such people? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises al Maribi (the innovator of this speech)!

*Do they utilise innovated principles in order to place the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the arena of ahlus Sunnah, or do they co-operate with anyone who deliberately utilises such false principles? No indeed; rather it is the Bid’ee who praises al-Maribi (an upholder of this calamity)!

*Do they utilise the principles of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah, such as Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Al-Maghraawi, Yahyah al-Hajoori and others similar to them, or do they co-operate with anyone who defends these Mubtadi’ah after being well aware of the unambiguous knowledge based refutations against them? No indeed; rather they refute all these Mubtadi’ah!

*Do they praise Ahmad Raza Khan Brelvi, or was it Abdul Haadi who praised Him? No indeed; rather they refute those who shelter the people who uttered such falsehood!

The Reality of Maktabah salafiyyah

http://salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=8601

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=18&Topic=4897

http://salaficentre.com/2012/07/shaikh-hasan-al-banna-on-witnessing-salafi-publications/

Indeed, it is not SP who commit crimes against the Salafi Manhaj, rather it is the Bid’ee and his associates who are guilty of it. We remind ourselves once again; Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghani (rahimahullaah) said:  Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle trials and disorder.  They are a chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of trials and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan (i.e. those who steadfastly follow the ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah). Have they (i.e. the people of Sunnah) committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass- alongside enmity and innovation- whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion). [Source: عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية 1/26-27]

And Allaah knows best

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

 

Continue Reading

[10] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness [Keyboard Warriors – The Bid’ee is Wilfully Oblivious of The Fact That Words and Terms Have to Match Behaviour]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Bid’ee said that we are ‘Keyboard Warriors’

Indeed, the Bid’ee is enraged by the response to his blatant and unequivocal falsehood, regardless whether a pen or keyboard is utilised for that purpose! But let us examine whether his description matches our behaviour.

Who Are Keyboard Warriors?

Keyboard warriors are people who, being unable to express their anger through physical violence (owning to their physical weakness, lack of bravery and/or conviction in real life), instead manifests said emotions through the text-based medium of the internet, usually in the form of aggressive writing that the Keyboard Warrior would not (for reasons previously mentioned) be able to give form to in real life; or a person who makes abusive or aggressive posts on the internet, typically one who conceals their true identity.

Let us comment on the underlined phrases and sentences in the above about keyboard warriors:

[1] Being unable to express their anger through physical violence;

Comment: Alhamadulil laah, we have never threatened the bid’ee with physical violence, rather he is the one known for that. See here: http://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/abu-usaamah-hurls-vile-abuse-at-brothers-calling-to-allah/   http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/abu-usamah-ad-dhahabi-glm-despicable-attempted-assault-must-read/

[2] Instead manifests said emotions through the text-based medium of the internet, usually in the form of aggressive writing that the Keyboard Warrior would not (for reasons previously mentioned) be able to give form to in real life;

Comment: Alhamdulil laah, the firmness and toughness we manifest to the Bid’ee is confined within the advice of Shaikh Ahmad (rahimahullaah), so we boycott him and warn against him in real life – we keep away from him physically and warn against him verbally. This is the sound manhaj because an open caller to Bidah and Shubuhaat is very dangerous.

[3] Or a person who makes abusive or aggressive posts on the internet, typically one who conceals their true identity.

Comment: Alhamdulil laah, all those who refute the Bid’ee are known, whether individual students of knowledge or Masjid Admins -they are all known. And never have we described him except with what he deserves-   a deceitful one, loud mouth, conniving, twister, foul mouth, slanderer etc

To be continued….In-Shaa-Allaah

 

Continue Reading

[9] A Series in Response to Abu Usaama’s Habitual Deceitfulness –[Malicious Speculation and Desperate Scapegotery]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

————————————————————————————————————————-

The Bid’ee says that if you do not agree with the Rulings of Shaikh Rabee, they throw you outside The Sunnah

————————————————————————————————————————-

Indeed, a sensible person asks him (herself): ‘’If it were the case that the Bid’ee was  declared misguided merely because he does not agree with Shaikh Rabee, then why is it that nether Shaikh Rabee nor the Salafiyyoon of the West preceded Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) in that verdict?’’ This is a simple answer, but unfortunately the Bid’ee is overwhelmed by an intense self-delusion, which turns him away from reality and leaves him clinging to fallacies and absurd speculations.

The man is negligent, idle and careless in his thinking and frightened of the truth. These bad habits have always manifested whenever he maliciously speculates or desperately looks for a scapegoat – we declared him misguided because he does not agree with the rulings of Shaikh Rabee!!! This shows that the Bid’ee’s intellect replaces reality with fallacy and facts with speculation. This is why you find him saying that if a person tells you that he (Goldie) supports Al-Maribi, then such a person will not be able to give you any evidence. However, examine his statement in 2004, as follows:

WHAT I STILL BELIEVE TODAY Wa Lilaahi-l-Hamd, that Abul Hasan IS SALAFEE and that the (TRUE) MAJOR SCHOLARS of this era, Imaam al-Albaanee and Imaam Ibn Baaz and Imaam Ibn ‘Uthaimeen and Shaikh Muqbil (may Allah have mercy upon them) they all died while being pleased with him – and that carries some weight and consideration in this Deen?! (raghm unoofihim)

The Bid’ee made this statement after the clear proofs had been established against Al-Maribi by many amongst the people of knowledge, yet he claims that there is no evidence that he supports al-Maribi and that he is declared misguided because he does not agree with the rulings of Shaikh Rabee!

Firstly: Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) was the first one who refuted Al-Maribi in detail, but also other scholars gave their verdicts. See here:http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Secondly: All the above scholars gave a verdict against Al-Maribi, which means that they agreed with Shaikh Rabee. However, not a single one of them declared Abu Usaama misguided besides Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) – that is because it was Shaikh Ahmad (rahimahullaah) who was asked specifically about Abu Usaama’s affair.

Thirdly: The verdict against Abu Usaama was given in the light of the detail evidences presented against Al-Maribi and Abu Usaama’s state of affairs, for one has to understand that not all the supporters of Al-Maribi were the same- some were duped and others like Abu Usaama are obstinate deceivers.  The question Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked clearly makes known who Abu Usaama was and his actions.

Question:  “O Shaykh Ahmad we have with us in America a man called Abu Usaamah, who is considered to be from the Du’aat, he aids and supports Abul-Hasan and he calls some noble Salafi brothers ghulaat (extremists), muqallidah (blind followers), and muhqiboon (the people whose religion is the religion of the one they blindly follow), so what is the legislated position from this man and how should we deal with him?’’

Answer: “Your position with him is the same as your position with the People of Innovation. Turn away from him and abandon him.”

Therefore, one clearly sees that the verdict against Abu Usaama was an independent one based on what was known of his evil state of affairs, and not merely due to the fact that he opposed the rulings of Shaikh Rabee. This claim of the Bid’ee is nothing else but a malicious speculation and desperate scapegotery. Neither Shaikh Rabee nor the Salafiyyoon are to be blamed for his downfall, rather he is a Mukallaf- responsible for his own actions unless it is proven that he is mentally unstable.

Finally: It is very clear that the Bid’ee treats fallacies as reality. He allows himself to be submerged in false certainty and self-delusion. He is obsessed with finding fault with Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) because the Shaikh exposed the bidah of his beloved Mubtadi’ah mentors (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi) and the Hizbi organisations he cooperates with (Ihyaa at-Turaath). The man is a waste of time, conniving, deceitful, slanderous and dishonest. The Bid’ee is once again reminded about his evil tongue and his slanders against Shaikh Rabee;

Ibn Asaakir (rahimahullaah) said: Know O my brother! May Allaah grant us and you His pleasure and make us from those who have awe of Him and fear of Him as He should be feared. Indeed, the flesh of the scholars is poisonous and Allaah’s way of disclosing the hidden affairs of those who diminish their worth is well known. [Source: Tabyeen Kadhib Al-Muftaree Fee Maa Nusiba Ilal-Imaam Abil Hasan Al-Ash’aree: page 29]

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: None violates the honour of the scholars who are upon the truth, except one of three (people): Either a hypocrite known for (his) hypocrisy, or an evil sinner who hates the scholars because they prevent him from his sinful (acts) of disobedience, or a misguided hizbi who hates the scholars because they neither agree with his hizbiyyah nor with his deviated views. [Source: Muhaadaraat Fil Aqeedah Wad-Dawa 2/190]

We ask Allaah to protect from Goldie and his lying tongue. Aameen

To be continued…InShaaAllaah

Continue Reading

Location

Telephone

0161 317 1481

Address

2 Dudley Street
Cheetham Hill
Manchester
M8 9DA

(C) 2012 The Salafi Centre of Manchester | 2 Dudley Street, Cheetham Hill, Manchester, M8 9DA
The Quran and Sunnah Upon The Understanding of The Salaf

Pin It on Pinterest