Tag: tamyee’

Which Solution does Ridiculous Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenah Dot Con/Islaam Nelson] desire for Us?!

In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Ridiculous Naveed Ayaaz stated: ”I have learnt that such individuals, and their peers in Birmingham, do not desire a solution….” [See full statement here: salaficentre.com/?p=12607 ]

Question to Shaikh Zaid Bin Haadee al-Madkhalee (rahimahullah):

Is there a difference between the verdict against a person that he is from Ahlul Bidah and the verdict that he is a Mubtadi (innovator)? And does the verdict against a person that he is not a Salafi or that he is a hizbi necessitate that he is a Mubtadi (innovator)? Can you please shed light on this affair?

Answer:

Firstly, you should know:

Indeed Ahlus Sunnah are people who possess fear of Allaah.  They neither make Takfeer, Tafseeq (i.e. declare a person a sinner) and Tabdee (declare a person an innovator) except against the one who deserves it based on the evidences in the Book and the Sunnah, and the understanding of the pious predecessors of this Ummah.

Secondly, you should know:

The people of desires and misguidance are (categorized into) those who are followed and those who follow; Indeed, those who are followed are the ones who set up the various principles of innovation and they call to their innovation and misguidance, and they will carry their burden of sins and the burden of the sins of those whom they misguided without knowledge, as it is clearly stated in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah.

As for the followers of a leader from amongst the people of desires, then in most cases they are of two categories:

The First Category:

Those who possess knowledge, but they harbour evil intentions; so they yield to Satan, desires and the urge of the evil soul. They follow the people of misguidance and oppose the callers to guidance (in that which) Allaah sent His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) with.

The Second Category:

Their share of knowledge is little, so the people of desires take advantage of them and they become (part) of their group. They convince them that what they call them to is the manifest truth and that what their opponents are upon is falsehood. And they convey to them a huge (number) of shubuhaat, in order to deceive them and submerge them into misguidance.  As for those who are followed—those who set up the principles of bidah and call the people to their bidah and misguidance–then indeed they are attributed to the bidah they innovated and call the people to, and for them there is no honour.

As for the followers of the people of desires, it is as I have stated that they are of two categories in most cases. They are to be called to the Sunnah and to cling to it, and that they (should) reject the bidah they have been deceived by and have yielded to. And if they respond to the call of truth through knowledge and action, and reject that which the people of desires and innovation call them to, then this is what is desired and it is a praiseworthy aim. If they reject the advice of the advisers and bargain with falsehood at the expense of truth, and give preference to innovation over the Sunnah, then they deserve to be assigned the term innovator.

[For further details, see Al-Ajwibah Al-Athariyyah Anil Masaa-il Al-Manhajiyyah, Khamsoona Su’aalan Wa-Jawaaban: page: 18-19:]


 So we say to ridiculous Naveed: This is the solution! It is what we have established based on the verdicts of the scholars against the three figure heads of Bidah and Dalaalah [Halabi, Maghraawi, Maribi], and their staunch follower Abu Usaamah.  As for those who are deceived by Masjid As-Sunnah’s admin, we will do our best to refer them to the students of knowledge whenever they seek clarification, and may Allaah free them from the deceptions of  the dishonest hizbiyyoon.  Aameen.

[الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ]—we neither established our stances based on the reckless methodology of the Hajaawirah nor the repugnant hizbiyyah of Ihyaa Turaath, Greenlane, Al-Maghrib Institute, Suhaib Hasan and their associates; rather we only followed the verdicts of the scholars of Ahlul Athar- founded upon the knowledge based proofs against Ma’ribi, Halabi, Maghraawi and their staunch follower Abu Usaamah.

Likewise, after Masjid As-Sunnah’s admin persisted upon misguidance and obstinacy, and proclaimed their support for Halabi, Maghraawi and Maribi, we followed the verdict of Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) against them. [Video: http://salaficentre.com/2012/06/verdict-upon-masjid-as-sunnah-committee-in-manchester-shaikh-rabees-tele-link-in-2003-2/

Therefore, neither should Naveed turn a blind eye to the facts nor expect us to follow his false assumptions and desires. Neither can the solution be based on the desires and false assumptions of those who are ignorant of the precise methodology of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah in dealing with the innovators and their staunch followers, nor can it be based on the solutions of those who attack the people of Salafiyyah and do not differentiate between the upright-knowledge based stances of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah from the corrupt, deceitful and false stances of the Mu-mayyi-een.

How very revealing is Naveed Ayaaz’s true state of affairs! He has the audacity to accuse the Salafiyyoon of not having a desire for a solution, yet he shows no shame in allying himself with a people who have persisted in their defence of three foremost figure heads of ahlul ahwaa wal-bidah(people of deisres and bid’ah)!  How very revealing it is of him, that Naveed Ayaaz is very eager to make silly and slanderous remarks against the Salafiyyoon, yet he expects to be considered a serious and responsible graduate! Indeed, Naveed must grow up and refrain from uttering such slanderous and absurd accusations. As Ibn Abdi Rabbihi (rahimahullaah) said: ”Choosing speech is more difficult than authorship, and indeed it is said: The choice of a man (in speech) is in harmony with his intellect.” [Source: quoted by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Umar Saalim Baazmool in Manhajul Bahthi Al-Ilmiy Wa-Kitaabah Fee Uloom Ash-Sharee-ah: page: 17]

And Allaah knows best

Note: We do not declare anyone an innovator or a Kaafir, except those whom our scholars have declared to kuffaar or innovators.


For those who do not know, then see the verdicts of the scholars on:

  • Halabi

http://salaficentre.com/2012/07/the-mufti-shaykh-ghudyaan-shaykh-fawzaan-and-shaykh-bakr-abu-zayd-on-grave-mistakes-of-halabi/

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/categories/kp-the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi.cfm

http://salaficentre.com/2013/03/the-categories-of-people-in-the-fitna-of-halabi-al-mubtadi-a-question-to-brixton/

  • Maribi

http://salaficentre.com/2012/08/verdict-against-abu-usaama-and-verdicts-against-his-shaikh-al-maribi-both-treated-like-ahlul-bidah/

  • Maghraawi

http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/naveed-ayaaz-madeenah-comislam-nelson-an-ally-of-some-of-those-who-defend-a-khaarijee-takfeeree/

  • Refuting falsehood

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/utjea-shaykh-saalih-al-fawzaan-the-true-and-real-fitnah-is-leaving-alone-the-people-of-falsehood-and-evil-and-remaining-silent-about-them.cfm

And to conclude then a reminder for Naveed to be mindful of this! http://salaficentre.com/2013/03/shaikh-abdullaah-al-bukhaari-re

 

Question: Brixton Masjid Admin and Staunch Affiliates –[Halabiyyoon]—which group do you belong to?!

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Al-Allaamah Zayd Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

As for the followers of a leader from amongst the people of desires, then in most cases they are of two categories:

The First Category:

Those who possess knowledge, but they harbour evil intentions; so they yield to Satan, desires and the urge of the evil soul. They follow the people of misguidance and oppose the callers to guidance (in that which) Allaah sent His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) with.

 

The Second Category:

Their share of knowledge is little, so the people of desires take advantage of them and they become (part) of their group. They convince them that what they call them to is the manifest truth and that what their opponents are upon is falsehood. And they convey to them a huge (number) of affairs that resemble the truth but are falsehood in reality, in order to deceive them and submerge them into misguidance.


[Al-Ajwibah Al-Athariyyah Anil Masaa-il Al-Manhajiyyah–(Khamsoona Su’aalan Wa-Jawaaban: page: 18-19)]

Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:

“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]


Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله  –  none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an  innovator, astray one). [2]

Audio


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]


Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)

Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.

Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]

 

[1] Salafiyyah In The UK–The Plots of the False Claimants and the Lies of The ignorant Slanderer Mr Zakir Naik

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَيۡسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلۡمٌ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمۡعَ وَٱلۡبَصَرَ وَٱلۡفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَانَ عَنۡهُ مَسۡـُٔولاً۬

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

Imaam Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) stated that from the statements of the scholars of Tafseer regarding the meaning of this ayah is that: You do not accuse anyone of something you have no knowledge of; you should not say that you have seen, whilst you haven’t seen; you should not say that you have heard, whilst you haven’t heard; and you should not give false testimony. In this ayah is also a prohibition from looking at haraam; listening to haraam and having conviction in what is impermissible. [For further details, see Zaadul Maseer]


 

This series –In’shaa’Allaah–will unveil the false accusations and blatant lies of the ignorant slanderer Mr Zakir Naik, who claims that the Salafis in the Uk make takfeer of one another.

 

 

Excerpt from main document the reader is urged to read

This document intends to provide a historical background into the Salafee da’wah1, within the context of the numerous fitnahs that have entered into it, that have in reality come from the direction of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon, and whoever was poisoned by them. The reader, inshaa’allaah, will have acquired a wider picture, and a context in which to place whatever is observed today of the various problems, differences and splits within the da’wah, or amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah and the Salafee da’wah.

 

No doubt, the last few decades have seen major global events unfolding. The first was the new wave of geo-political strategies of the Kuffaar in the Muslim lands, and parallel to that, was the great upheaval caused – in the last decade specifically and more profoundly – in the Salafee da’wah by the penetration of the Ikhwaan under the disguise and costume of ascription to the “doctrinal Salafiyyah” (aqaa’id). An ascription that was divorced and separated from the practical, manhaj-based, Salafiyyah (manaahij) to which they were actually opposed, due to the false methodologies that they had innovated or imbibed, and which they wished to enter into the Salafees. So their ascription to the doctrinal belief-based aspect of Salafiyyah was the veil by which they entered their foreign, deviated methodologies amongst the unsuspecting Salafees, hoping that no one would suspect them, merely because they held onto the Salafee aqeedah, and would often defend it 2, and this was the veil they used to enter upon the Salafees and the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah.

 

The merging of these collection of events and occurrences at the one and the same time (during the last decade), led many people ascribing themselves to Salafiyyah to be led to great confusion and to take on a variety of different and separate paths over time, and wander off in every direction – due to the absence of the proliferation of and grounding in the methodologies (manaahij) of the Book and the Sunnah amongst the people.

 

What is of concern in this document is to bring about clarity in the methodologies of the Salaf, because this is what will bring unity amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah, bringing about a common perception and outlook with shared understandings and goals, and helping to bring about a walaa and baraa that is based around what it truly ought to be based around, which is the aqaa’id (beliefs), the manaahij (methodologies) and correct Salafee mawaaqif (positions). Unfortunately, there has been a tendency for people to take isolated events or occurrences (such as calamities that have taken place in the lands of the Muslims, non-Muslim aggressions, or specific issues that have taken place with respect to personalities, or people of the knowledge in the da’wah, or issues related to the da’wah), and then to build their whole perception of the da’wah and individuals connected to it, based upon these isolated incidents, issues or occurrences. This led them to become totally out of focus, and lose track of the wider picture. The perceptions created in their minds by way of these isolated affairs, or a collection of unrelated affairs, then led them to see all future issues and developments with these tainted and subjective perceptions, disabling them from seeing everything in its proper perspective. All subsequent occurrences, as they saw them, would feed into and re-inforce these initial (erroneous, subjective) perceptions. This would then also affect their speech and behaviour, making them take positions and hold loyalties or disownments, and direct their emotions of love and and hate, and choose their company and friendship, all upon false criterions and false determinations based upon subjective experiences and limited, narrow viewpoints tied down to one or a few or a collection of issues or events3. What was also a part of the cause for this was the fact that true and real clarity, concerning these tribulations and the methodologies of the Salaf had not emerged then, unlike more recent times.

 

For this reason, this document contains a historical account of the true origins and background to the many problems that have entered the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah in recent times – in order to allow the reader to put everything into context. It is hoped that all those who ascribed themselves to the Salafee da’wah at one time or another during the last decade will gain some insights, and will gain a thorough understanding about what has occurred in the da’wah following the Gulf War. This will allow them to appreciate, in retrospect, the clarity that has now emerged concerning the sum whole of this fitnah. It will also allow them to determine the true Scholars, those who are upon the truth, upon the Salafee aqeedah, the Salafee manhaj and those who are traversing upon the Salafee da’wah and implementing it, following the actual manhaj of these Scholars. It is also hoped that these insights allows the true sincere Salafees, who truly desire Salafiyyah, in belief, speech and action, to unite together based upon the clarity that has now emerged by way of the collective statements and clarifications of the Scholars, over the past 8 years or so, in relation to the various methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen that were disguised as Salafiyyah and which have been exposed and refuted sufficiently.   PDF here: [1] false_methodologies


 

Source: http://salafipublications.com/sps/ under the title: The Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen Upon The Path of Salafiyyah [A Historical Review and Analysis]

They say: ”We are not obliged to take the speech of the Shaikh.” So how many trustworthy scholars do they need in order to abandon the Innovators?!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


 You find a scholar quoting and refuting the affairs of misguidance found in the Book of such and such a person, in such and such page; yet you find these people saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’


Question to Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him)

Are the issues of Jarh Wat-Tadeel based on Ijtihaad? And how do we refute the one who says, ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!

 

Answer:

A group from the schemers against the Salafi Methodology and those who wear a false garment of the Salafiyyah Methodology seek to place in the affair of Jarh Wat-Tadeel, (the false principle): ”We rectify, but we do not disparage;” (and the false principle): ”We want a broad and extensive methodology that will accommodate all the ummah”; (and the false principle): ‘’We rectify but we do not destroy;” Meaning: Neither evil nor bidah is repelled; rather all the Ummah are accommodated in a board and extensive methodology to the extent that even the Raafidah (shia) are accommodated.  So these people begin to make false accusations against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and against those (i.e. the scholars) who establish it.  Some of these false accusers have gone as far as saying that there is no proof in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah to establish the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel!

Indeed, the Qur’aan is filled with the proofs of Jarh Wat Tadeel. The people of pharaoh have been refuted and disparaged; the people of Prophet Nooh have been refuted and disparaged; the people of Prophet Hud have been refuted and disparaged; the people of Prophet Saaleh have been refuted and disparaged; the Quraish have been refuted and disparaged and Abu Lahab has been refuted and disparaged.  The Sunnah and the methodology of the Salaf are filled with Jarh Wat Tadeel and it is a weapon against the people of innovation.  These people promoting such false principles want to break this ‘Jarh Wat-Tadeel Weapon’ into pieces, and they want to deprive the Salafis of this ‘Jarh Wat-Tadeel Weapon’ which is traced back to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam).

So a person comes along and wages war against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel; then a second person comes along and wages war against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel; then a third person comes along and wages war against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel; then a fourth one comes along and wages war against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel……..then a tenth person comes along and wages war against the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and they are all followed by crowds!! Therefore be warned against these people, for they wear a false gown of Salafiyyah in order to split the Salafis through these false principles and precepts.

A person commits murder and was seen by two trustworthy witnesses; then these two witnesses are summoned in the presence of the ruler who applies the Islamic rulings; so what will he judge by?  He should judge by the law of Islam; and if not then he has opposed the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam).    Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَأَشۡہِدُواْ ذَوَىۡ عَدۡلٍ۬ مِّنكُمۡ

”And take for witness two just persons from among you (Muslims).” [65:2]

The evidence for giving witnesses and the evidences for Jarh Wat-Tadeel are one and the same thing.  As for the untrustworthy person, then his narration is not accepted. Likewise, the liar- the deceiver whose speech cannot be determined for its correctness, then his testimony is not accepted. Neither his criticism nor commendation of a person is accepted.  However, if he is a scholar who is precise and skilful, and he says about a person: ”Such and such a person is a liar”; then it is obligatory upon the people to accept his speech.  The Salaf followed this methodology, (such as their saying): ”such and such is a liar”; ”such and such has a bad memory”; ”such and such is an innovator”; ”such and such is a murji”; ”such and such is a khaariji”; ”such and such is a mutazili” etc   These statements have been made by Imaam Ahmad, Imaam Ibn Ma’een, Imaam Ibn Al-Madeenee, Imaam Bukhaaree etc.  This the path followed by the Salaf; and why is that the case? That is because Allaah commanded us to accept the narration of the trustworthy narrators.  Allaah (The Most High) said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ إِن جَآءَكُمۡ فَاسِقُۢ بِنَبَإٍ۬ فَتَبَيَّنُوٓاْ

O you who believe! If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it’’ [49:6]

Clarification and verification is to be sought when a rebellious evil person narrates. The narration of a rebellious evil person is not declared a lie straight away because it may be correct; but it is not accepted until it is verified.

As for the narration of a trustworthy person–as long as he is trustworthy and precise in what he narrates from the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam), then it is obligatory to accept his narration.  The Books of the Sunnah are filled with the narrations of those truthful narrators—a truthful person who reports from another truthful person with a chain of transmission going back to the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). However, these people who are seeking to attack the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel with their false principles want to abolish the sound principles upon which our Religion is established.

Many of the Ahaadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam), the transmissions from the companions (radiyallaahu-anhum) and the transmissions from the Imaams of the Sunnah were transmitted from one trustworthy person to another trustworthy person… and it obligatory to accept them, due to the saying of Allaah (The Most High):

[وَأَشۡہِدُواْ ذَوَىۡ عَدۡلٍ۬ مِّنكُمۡ ]

And take for witness two just persons from among you (Muslims).

And with regards to transmission of information, then the information transmitted by one person is sufficient because the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) used to send one person to Chosroes (i.e. the Emperor of Persia) to call him to Islaam and establish the proofs against him.

And he (sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam) sent one person to Caesar the King of Rome to call him to Islaam and establish the proofs against him.  The people used to enter Islaam through the message of this one trustworthy-truthful person sent by the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam).  And if they rejected Islaam and refused to follow the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) based on the information transmitted by this one trustworthy-truthful person, he (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) prepared an army against them. The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) prepared an army for the battle of Tabuk against the Romans based on the fact that they rejected the call to Islaam which was communicated to them by one person.

He (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) sent individuals to Bahrain, Oman and Yemen and their narrations were accepted; so how about in this present time of ours when there are ten or fifty Salafi (scholars) who are in agreement regarding a particular affair, but their narrations are rejected. And those who reject them, say: ‘’There has to be a consensus of all the scholars.’’  And from the false principles of these people is that they say: ‘’we neither accept criticism against a person nor a praise for him even if many of the contemporary scholars say that such a person is an innovator.’’ 

Therefore be warned against these people, because they make a claim to Salafiyyah, whilst seeking to destroy the Salafi Methodology, its principles and foundations.  How many false precepts do they have, such as their saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’  You find a scholar quoting and refuting the affairs of misguidance found in the Book of such and such a person, in such and such page, yet you find these people saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’

This statement of theirs is a principle by way of which they seek to shun and reject truth.  It is a false principle by way of which they seek to reject the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel.  Therefore, learn the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and look to the methodology of the Salaf; and leave alone these who misguide. They bring turmoil upon the true religion of Allaah and upon the Methodology of the Salaf and its followers.


 

Source:

Slightly Paraphrased from a lecture of the Shaikh delivered on Yawm Al-Khaamis 28 Shawaal 1431


 

We seek Allaah’s Protection from persistence upon falsehood…Aameen.  Reminder:  http://salaficentre.com/2013/03/shaikh-abdullaah-al-bukhaari-reasons-for-persistence-upon-falsehood/

http://salaficentre.com/2013/12/doubt-destroyed-do-the-salafees-have-double-standards-by-ustaadh-anwar-wright/

 

 

 

 

Scholars perform a virtuous Jihaad Against Al-Halabi Mubtadi Daal with proofs; but Brixton shelters him!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Ibnul Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said:

”Exposing the defects of these ones (i.e. the innovators) and making known their disgraceful affairs (i.e. their doubts, innovations, lies, deceptions etc) is from the best of Jihaad in the path of Allaah.” [Mukhtasar Sawaa-iq Al-Mursalah 1/103]

Reminder:

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

And we hope those errors that have occurred from them (i.e. the brothers at Masjid Ar-Rahmah) will not be repeated by our brothers. This is my advice, and if the errors are repeated, then then it will be hurtful and they will be considered to be blameworthy. And then the end result for these brothers at Masjid Rahmah will be like the end result of that which occurred with those of Brixton Masjid in London! That they ended up with Abul-Hasan, Ali Hasan and those types of people, that which occurred with Abdul-Haqq Baker and whoever was with him such as Abu Haajir and others. They came to me here many times, and I would advise them. And what became apparent is that they are not truthful (laysoo saadiqeen)! These people from Brixton Masjid would sit with me and listen and say “yes” and then go and do the opposite! But this in reality did not harm except themselves! So I advise you with the same that you are truthful, outwardly and inwardly. And in this world you will be treated based upon your outward deeds. So I advise you not to be like these people at the Brixton Markaz for they are NOT truthful people (ghayr saadiqeen), for indeed they would come to me many times and often. I would try to rectify the affairs between them and the brothers in Birmingham (UK) at Salafi Publications. So whatever they (Brixton Masjid) would agree to in these sittings to adhere to, they would exit and abandon all that they agreed to. So I advise you to be truthful upon the correctness and be earnest. [1]


[1] [http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1018-Masjid-Rahmah-USA-and-Brixton-UK-The-Observations-and-Advice-of-Shaikh-Muhammad-bin-Haadee]

Muhammad Al-Maliki Allies With Those Whose Mentors Slander The Scholars

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The innovator Ali Al-Halabi (may Allaah guide him) said to Shaikh Khaalid Abdur-Rahmaan (may Allaah preserve him): ”O Abu Muhammad! The Mashaayikh in Najd or in the land of the two holy mosques—some of the Mashaayikh only speak against us out of envy; and from the most severe of them (i.e. in speech against us out of envy) is Fawzaan.” [see link: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=141713]

Muhammad Al-Maliki! Brixton, Luton, Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheemthamhill- Manchester) and Abu Usaamah are all staunch defenders of Ali Al-Halabi; so why do you co-operate and ally with the followers of Ali Al-Halabi, whilst Ali speaks ill of the Scholars of the Sunnah in our Era and fabricate lies against them, in order to hide his innovations and affairs of misguidance?! Imaam Abu Haatim Ar-Raazee (rahimahullaah) said: ”From the signs of ahlul bidah is that they speak ill of Ahlul Athar’’ Ahmad Ibn Sinaan Al-Qattaan (rahimahullaah) said: There is no innovator in the dunyah except that he hates ahlul hadeeth, and when a man innovates the sweetness of hadeeth is removed from his heart.” [Aqeedatus Salaf 102]

O Muhammad! Why do you ally yourself with Brixton, Masjid As-Sunnah and Luton, whose figurehead (Ali Halabi) is drowned in misguidance and deviation? O Muhammad! Why do you ally yourself with Brixton, Masjid As-Sunnah and Luton, whose figurehead (Ali Halabi) embraces and defends the people of bidah? Shaikh Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

‘’And Imaan is known about a man, just as all the states of his heart are known by way of his (outward) allegiances, enmities, his rejoicing, anger, hunger, thirst, and other such affairs. For these matters have certain outward binding necessities (lawaazim dhaahirah) and the outward matters necessitate inward matters. And this is a matter known, the people know this concerning the one that they have experienced and tested (jarraboohu wamtahinoohu)… [Minhaaj-as-sunnah 8/475] [Translation:Salafipublications.com]

And Allaah knows best

[4] Greenlane’s Admin [Deceitful Hizbiyyoon] Principles that can never be abandoned

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Ubaid Ibn Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) said:

A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only a human; he can be distracted and forgetful; he can be deceived by evil people; or he used to consider that man to be trustworthy–who has now been declared untrustworthy–and he deceives him. The witnesses to this affair are many, because many of those whose status has been dropped– due to been declared unreliable based on evidence–are in reality people who wage war against the Sunnah and its people.  So they come along with copies of their books and read it to the distinguished scholars–those whom virtue and leadership is witnessed for them in the religion–and the affair of this trickster and plotter is hidden from that noble scholar, which had he known about it the status of this person would have dropped in his eyes.

So this scholar gives praise based on what he heard. And if the book (of this trickster) is printed, it is disseminated and transmitted by his supporters and they spread a good reputation about him. Thus there are those who argue saying, “such and such praised him–Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah), or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) praised this book. However these scholars are excused; rather this trickster was hidden from that scholar.

So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this [deceiver, trickster, intrigant and plotter] from his books.  We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books, and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech.’’ Therefore, it is obligatory on you to be fair, and to be free from that wild and zealous attachment; and to be free from desires that blind a person. It is obligatory upon you that your search should be for the truth.

 

Al-Allaamah Ubaid Ibn Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) also stated:

If the affair of a person is hidden from you–the one whose books and cassettes are famous and his fame is widespread–then ask those who are well acquainted with him and those who know about his state of affairs.  That is because neither is the Sunnah hidden nor are its people. A man’s Tazkiyah (i.e. the clear witness that he is upright upon the Sunnah) are his own actions. His Tazkiyah are his own actions that he is upon the Sunnah. It is the witness and the people mention him with it during his life and after his death.

 

The Shaikh (may Allaah preserve him) also said:

The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat (i.e. in their efforts and striving to reach the correct verdicts). Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow).  [End of quote: Paraphrased and Abridged, See Link: www.sahab.net/home/?p=329]


 

Reader: The evidence is with the Salafiyyoon of SalafiPublications and the rest of the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah.  The presence of personalities at Greenlane can never change the reality, as Shaikh Ubaid said: ‘’The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden.’’

By Allaah! We will warn against Greenlane and we will speak the haqq abaout them.  We will refute the arguments of anyone who defends Greenlane, regardless who they are!  The only noble option left for Greenlane is that they stop defiling the name of salafiyyah through their  repugnant hizbiyyah and alliance with ahlul bidah.   These above principles mentioned by Shaikh Ubaid can never be abandoned, regardless of what others say about Greenlane’s Admin, whilst they persist in their hizbiyyah and alliance with ahlul bidah.  And Allaah knows best.

To be continued…In-Sha-Allaah