Tag: tamyee’

A brief response by Shaikh Fawzaan regarding the one who says that praising ahlul bidah is permissible because the Messenger praised the khawaarij

Shaikh Fawzaan responds to the statement of the one who says that praising ahlul bidah is permissible because the Messenger praised the khawaarij

This questioner from Britain says:

We have a caller who says that indeed it is permissible to praise Ahlul Bidah and that indeed the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) praised the Khawaarij by way of his statement: A people will appear amongst you, you will belittle your prayers compared to their prayer….etc

Answer: This is not a praise from the Messenger –sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam-; he (i.e. this caller) did not complete the hadeeth (which is) ‘’They (i.e. Khawaarij) will exit the religion just as an arrow goes through its target.” The end of the Hadeeth (is), ‘’ ‘They (i.e. Khawaarij) will exit the religion just as an arrow goes through its target.” The Messenger-sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam- intended to rebuke them and warn against them, and it is not praise… Listen to audio on this link: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=155460

O Masjid al-Furqan’s Admin! – the allies of Goldie, Al-Maghrib Institute, Naveed Ayaaz and others- The Attendance of Any Teacher (regardless his status) at a particular Masjid or the Explanation of a Book of Salafiyyah at that Masjid Does Not Change The Reality of such a Masjid, whilst its Admin openly and Shamelessly Cooperates With Ahlul Bidah On Other Days

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

O Masjid Al-Furqan Admin and Naveed Ayaaz!

Allaah (The Most High) said:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَكُونُوا مَعَ الصَّادِقِينَ

O you who believe! Be afraid of Allah, and be with those who are truthful. [9:119]

 

Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said:

We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger.  We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects.  As for others, they play games and tricks.  By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth. http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=114620

This is the first affair we present to the hizbiyyoon. The salafiyyoon do not hide behind personalities considered to be upon the Sunnah, whilst on the other hand they sit, shelter and defend ahlul bidah or their staunch followers. This is what Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) stated, as follows: ”We call to the methodology of the Salaf-to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger.  We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects.  As for others, they play games and tricks.  By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth.”

O Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin! You deceive the people by inviting some of those considered to be upon the Sunnah, whilst you shelter others from ahlul bidah. However, this will not weaken the resolve of the Salafiyyoon, regardless what support you receive. Shaikh Ubaid Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) said: ‘’A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only a human. He can be distracted and forgetful, and he can be deceived by evil people.”

So we say to Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin, Naveed Ayaaz and other deceivers similar to them, do you not feel shy in the presence of Allaah, whilst cooperating with the deviants of Al-Maghrib Institute, the staunch followers of the Mubtadi’ah al-Halabi, Al-Maribi and Al-Maghraawi? Allaah’s Aid is sought! You keep the company of those who defend Mubtadi’ah, rather you keep the company of those whom the likes of Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) have refuted due to their deviations, such as the likes of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin.

You do not see anything wrong in keeping the company of these Mubtadi Shelterers. Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (rahimahullaah) said: Had the innovator humbled himself to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet, he would not have followed his innovation; but he is amazed with his views, so he follows what he invented. [AdhTadzkirah Fil Wadh: page:97]

So, you have no problem keeping the company of those who defend innovators, such as Goldie and the Admin of Masjid As-Sunnah, who defend Al-Halabi al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani Al-Mubtadi and Al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri Al-Mubtadi. However, you think that inviting few people of knowledge will free you from blame.

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

Once Again [On 2nd Dhul Qidah (17th August 2015)] Mohammad Abdullah Al-Maliki Deliberately Refused to Give Details, So That He Can Shelter the Staunch UK Followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi and Deceive the Unsuspecting Recipients

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

——————————————————————————————————————–

A Brief Reminder

One has to understand that Muhammad Al-Maliki deliberately utters half-truths when seeking to slander Al-Markazus Salafi. He utters half-truths to represent the whole truth, or possibly lead to a false conclusion. This is what many deceivers do, for they utter half-truths in order to deceive the recipients- by uttering something believable and using some aspects of their statements that can be shown to be true as good reason to believe the statement is true in its entirety, or that the statement represents the whole truth. So by way of this method, Muhammad seeks to deceive us, so that we consider his statements to be knowledge and proofs to be to be acted upon accordingly.

Likewise, he stated: [So whoever calls to the Aqeedah of the salaf and to the Sunnah in worship and never call to Partisanship and always linked Salafi scholars not necessarily a particular scholar but any Salafi scholars, so if he is doing so why would he be boycotted]. Once again Muhammad deliberately ignored the fact that Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi are Mubtadi’ah and people of Hizbiyyah. However, he refrains from discussing the main issues and utters a general statement. That is because Muhammad’s staunch UK allies are none else but the staunch allies of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi.

————————————————————————————————————————

Muhammad Al-Maliki (may Allaah grant him Tawfeeq to accept the truth) stated that (a) Salafiyyah doesn’t mean that the person is perfect and never makes mistake. (b) He also said: So whoever calls to the Aqeedah of the salaf and to the Sunnah in worship and never call to Partisanship and always linked salafi scholars not necessarily a particular scholar but any salafi scholars, so if he is doing so why would he be boycotted. (c) He also stated that Shaikh Rabee warns against the Ghuluww we are upon.

Firstly, blind Muhammad Al-Maliki has once again concealed the true reality of the affairs and slandered, just as he slandered the Salafiyyoon of Al-Markazus Salafi and sought to conceal the truth about the followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-maribi in 2012. See link: http://salaficentre.com/2015/02/the-reality-of-muhammad-al-maliki-heedless-captain-of-the-three-decker-sinking-ship-of-the-hizbiyyoon/

Secondly, Muhammad reminds us of the fact that a Salafi can commit errors, as if the Salafiyyoon of Al-Markazus Salafi believe otherwise. On the other hand, he stated as follows: [So whoever calls to the Aqeedah of the salaf and to the sunnah in worship and never call to Partisanship and always linked salafi scholars not necessarily a particular scholar but any salafi scholars, so if he is doing so why would he be boycotted].

Therefore, we say to blind Muhammad Al-Maliki: The mistakes of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi are mistakes that led the scholars to pass the verdict of Tabdee against them. So not all mistakes are the same and you have deliberately refrained from giving detail. Indeed, there is an answer for you in the response given to Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli by Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi, as follows:

Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli (may Allaah rectify his affair):

Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli (may Allaah rectify his affair) stated that it is obligatory to preserve the status and acknowledge the position of those scholars of Ahlus Sunnah- those who are known for their sound creed and Ijtihaad in aiding the Sunnah. It is not permissible to diminish their worth; declaring them innovators; accusing them of (following) desires or bigoted partisanship merely due to their mistakes in Ijtihaad.

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) responded:

Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) responded to this statement of Dr Ruhayli and unveiled once again the reality behind this affair. He pointed out to Dr Ruhayli that this statement of his is an indisputable affair (in the view) of Ahlus Sunnah regarding those who are known for their sound creed and ijtihaad in aiding the Sunnah- even though errors may occur from them in the intricate affairs of the religion and those affairs whose reality or evidence is not apparent to some people, however their status is preserved and their positions acknowledged. No one speaks ill of them except a person of desires just as is the case with the people of desires.

[1] However, if the deviation is related to the manifestly clear affairs, such as when this claimant to the Sunnah defends the people of bidah and misguidance-those who propagate the falsehood of Wahdatul Wujood; negation of Allaah’s Attributes; revilement of the companions of the Messenger; the eternity of the souls and other than these clear affairs of misguidance; or he defends-by way of lies and treachery-those who hold the view regarding Wahdatul Adyaan etc and other manifest affairs of misguidance, which are even rejected by (other) people of bidah and misguidance;

[2] And in addition to this he wages war against Ahlus Sunnah-seeking to devalue their scholars; considers them to be extremists and that they are from those who utilise odd speech when confronting the people of misguidance and when refuting their innovations;

[3] And in addition to this, he innovates false principles in order to contradict the Usool of Ahlus Sunnah- [such as the false principle “we rectify mistakes but we do not refute.” And some of them say: “we rectify mistakes but we do not destroy.” And the false principle: ‘I am not obliged (or obligated)]- by way of which they seek to reject truth that is clear as the sun;

[4] And he also applies the term ‘Ahlus Sunnah Wal -Ittibaa’ to the people of bidah and the misguided paths that include affairs of Shirk, Bidah and Wahdatul Wujood;

[5] And he describes Ahlus Sunnah with the words scum, vile, extremists, blind followers, bigots and other wicked speech against Ahlus Sunnah;

[6] And in addition, he describes the Sahaabah with the word ‘Ghuthaa-scum’ and does not consider this description to be revilement if it is uttered by the likes of himself…..

Indeed with regards to this category of people whose state of affairs is as such, then it is not permissible for a sane person- who is acquainted with the Sunnah and honours the Sunnah- that he considers such people to be from Ahlus Sunnah; or asking the people to preserve their status and acknowledge their ranks; or forbids the people from declaring them innovators; or forbids the people from accusing them of following desires and bigotry, despite the fact that their evil desires, affairs of misguidance, trials and illegal partisanship to the major people of misguidance are all manifest; whilst on the other hand their war against Ahlus Sunnah is clear and manifest; for indeed Ahlus Sunnah and their Imaams declare (a person) an innovator due to (affairs) that are far lesser than these calamities.

And we find Imaam Ahmad (rahimahullaah) saying about the one who reviles Ahlul Hadeeth: “(He is a) heretic, a heretic!’’  Ahlus Sunnah stated about this ruling of Imaam Ahmad -and from them Shaikhul Islaam ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) who stated with emphasis: ‘’That is because he (Ahmad) knew its significance.” Imaam Abu Zur’ah (rahimahullaah) stated: ‘’Whoever diminishes the worth of a single one amongst the companions of Muhammad, then he is a heretic.’’ Ahlus Sunnah transmitted this statement and no one opposed it. And here are the books of Aqeedah and the books of Jarh Wat-Tadeel in the presence of the people.

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَقُولُوا قَوْلًا سَدِيدًا

يُصْلِحْ لَكُمْ أَعْمَالَكُمْ وَيَغْفِرْ لَكُمْ ذُنُوبَكُمْ ۗ وَمَن يُطِعِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ فَازَ فَوْزًا عَظِيمًا

O you who believe! Keep your duty to Allah and fear Him, and speak (always) the truth. He will direct you to do righteous good deeds and will forgive you your sins. And whosoever obeys Allah and His Messenger he has indeed achieved a great achievement (i.e. he will be saved from the Hell-fire and made to enter Paradise). [Soorah Al-Ahzaab. Ayah: 70-71] [End of quote] [Source: Abridged and paraphrased. See ‘Bayaan Maa Fee Naseehati Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli Minal Khalal Wal-Ikhlaal. Page: 63-64]

Therefore, we challenge Muhammad Al-Maliki to prove that Al-Halabi Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maribi al-Ikhwaani Al-Mubtadi and Al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri Al-Mubtadi and others similar to them are free from all the affairs of misguidance mentioned in Shaikh Rabee’s reply to Dr Ibraaheem ar-Ruhayli. Rather from Al-Maribi’s calamities is that he refers to the Sahaabah as scum and claims that all the scholars who agree with Shaikh Rabee are blind followers. However, Muhammad Al-Maliki defends the followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill Manchester). See here: http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Likewise, Al-Halabi innovated many principles and as a result he was declared a Mubtadi by those scholars who are more acquainted with his affairs. Indeed, Muhammad al-Maliki and his companions cannot nullify the fact that Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi are guilty of some the affairs mentioned in Shaikh Rabee’s reply to Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli. Likewise, Muhammad Al-Maliki has deliberately refrained from detailing these affairs surrounding the staunch UK followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi. That is because if he honestly details the affair, he will difinately upset his allies at Brixton, Luton and Masjid As-Sunnah. See here: http://salaficentre.com/2013/02/the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi-the-innovator/

Indeed, one has to understand that Muhammad Al-Maliki deliberately utters half-truths when seeking to slander Al-Markazus Salafi. He utters half-truths to represent the whole truth, or possibly lead to a false conclusion. This is what many deceivers do, for they utter half-truths in order to deceive the recipients- by uttering something believable and using some aspects of their statements that can be shown to be true as good reason to believe the statement is true in its entirety, or that the statement represents the whole truth. So by way of this method, Muhammad seeks to deceive us, so that we led to believe that his statements regarding the UK followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi and Al-Maghraawi are proofs to be to be acted upon accordingly. This is why he stated: [Salafiyyah doesn’t mean that the person is perfect and never makes mistake]. However, he deliberately refrained from clarifying the fact that mistakes are not all the same and that the staunch UK followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi are staunch supporters of these three Mubtadi’ah. This is nothing else but blindness and concealment.

Likewise, he stated: [So whoever calls to the Aqeedah of the salaf and to the Sunnah in worship and never call to Partisanship and always linked Salafi scholars not necessarily a particular scholar but any Salafi scholars, so if he is doing so why would he be boycotted]. Once again Muhammad deliberately ignored the fact that Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi are Mubtadi’ah and people guilty of repugnant of Hizbiyyah. However, he refrains from discussing the main issues and utters a general statement. That is because Muhammad staunch UK allies are none else but the staunch allies of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi.

Finally, blind Muhammad once again accuse us of Haddaadiyyah for exposing the staunch Uk followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi. However, Muhammad is blind to the fact it is him that praises the vile Haddaadiyah Yahyah Al-Hajoori and not the Salafiyyoon of Al-Markazus Salafi. See here: http://salaficentre.com/2014/05/1-%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A9-foolishness-praise-from-pseudo-shaikh-muhammad-al-maliki-to-al-hajoori-al-haddaai-al-mubtadi/

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

[3] Wilful Blindness or Wilful Oblivion?! Muhammad Al-Maliki says that Shaikh Rabee Warns against Haddaadiyyah, But Muhammad Praises a Haddaadi and calls us Haddaadi for Transmitting Shaikh Rabee’s Refutations Against The Followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill Manchester]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

———————————————————————————————————–

It was said to Imaam Al-Awzaa’ee (rahimahullaah): Indeed a man says, ‘I sit with Ahlus Sunnah and I sit with ahlul bidah.” So Al-Awzaa’ee (rahimahullaah) said: This man wants to equate truth with falsehood.

[2/456 Al-I’baanah]

——————————————————————————————————————–

Muhammad Al-Maliki (may Allaah guide him) says that he loves Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi and Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve them), however he allies himself with those who slander them and ally themselves with the likes of Al-Halabi Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maribi al-Ikhaani Al-Mubtadi and Al-Maghraawi at-takfeeri Al-Mubtadi.

When the likes of Shaikh Rabee gave advice recently, Muhammad Al-Maliki was quick to transmit it to a brother via WhatsApp, even though he cooperates, praises and defends those who still attack the Shaikh for refuting the innovators (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi). He transmits the advice of the Shaikh, but co-operates with Brixton, Luton and Masjid as-Sunnah- all of whom are staunch defenders of innovators. Therefore, we want Muhammad to tell Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi, Shaikh Ubaid or Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhaari that he transmits the advice of Shaikh Rabee, but defends, praises and visits the staunch followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and al-Maribi, and inform us what Shaikh Rabee says. Indeed, is Muhammad Al-Maliki oblivious of this statement of Imaam Al-Awzaa’ee (rahimahullaah), as follows: It was said to Imaam Al-Awzaa’ee (rahimahullaah): Indeed a man says, ‘I sit with Ahlus Sunnah and I sit with ahlul bidah.” So Al-Awzaa’ee (rahimahullaah) said: This man wants to equate truth with falsehood. [2/456 Al-I’baanah]

Here we have Muhammad Al-Maliki sitting with the staunch followers of the Mubtad’ah (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maghraawi) at Masjid as-Sunnah, yet he attempts to cover his tracks by transmitting Shaikh Rabee’s advice in order to deceive the unsuspecting Salafiyoon, who may think that Muhammad has no connection to the people of hizbiyyah and Tamyi.

Simply put, transmitting Shaikh Rabee’s advice is not the same as following the unambiguous knowledge base proofs he has written against the Mubtadi’ah, such as Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi, Al-Maghraawi and their followers. Rather, what is expected from Muhammad is to show by way of statements and actions that he neither supports Mubtadi’ah nor their staunch followers at Brixton, Masjid As-Sunnah and Luton. He ignores the knowledge based proofs and only repeats his own opinions when challenged to provide evidence to justify his stances, or the disgraceful slanders he has uttered against Al-Markazus Salafi.

Muhammad should understand that the Salafiyyoon cannot accept mere opinions and abandon clear evidences. We are not from those people who hold assumptions and mere opinions, especially when they see them as reasonable or when such assumptions and opinions support their erroneous views or unjustified stances. This is what the dishonest ones amongst the hizbiyyoon do in order to manipulate the evidences in efforts to persuade their audiences to see their view.

But Alhamadulil laah, the honest students in the West are well acquainted with the manipulative speech utilized by the hizbiyyoon and their staunch supporters to confuse the people. For instance, Muhammad Al-Maliki (the staunch ally and companion of the Uk hizbiyyoon) whilst addressing the question of how we should deal with the staunch followers of Mubtadi’ah, said: Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Ubaid and Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi warn against Haddaadiyyah’, yet Muhammad praises Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi and call us Haddaadees for transmitting Shaikh Rabee’s warning against Masjid As-Sunnah. So by way of this false argument which he naively considered to be intelligence and wisdom, his absurd contradictions became very clear  to the Salafiyyoon..

Indeed, Muhammad prefers the companionship of the followers of Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi and Al-Maghraawi over the wisdom, clarity and proofs in Shaikh Rabee’s refutation. This is the case because he openly allies himself with Brixton and Masjid As-Sunnah and turns a blind eye to the evidences against them. The wise scholars speak due to fear of Allaah and the evidences they possessed against these people, but Muhammad speaks in defense of Brixton, Masjid As-Sunnah and Luton. This is nothing else but blatant falsehood accompanied by willful blindness and wiillful oblivion. We ask Allaah (The Most High) to protect us from this falsehood and guide Muhammad Al-Maliki to correctness.

And Allaah knows best

To be continued…In-Shaa-allaah

[4]Does Hizbi (Abu Bilal Hanif-Marriage Maker) fear Allaah with regards to who he befriends and accompany? Be warned against falling into Abu Bilal’s Trap because he’ll give your daughters to Hizbiyyoon in Marriage- those who keep the company of Mubtadi’h and their staunch followers

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A man said to Al-Hasan [Al-Basri (rahimahullaah)]: I have a daughter and she has been sought for marriage; so to whom should I give her in marriage? He (Al-Hasan) said: Marry her to the one who fears Allaah, for he will be kind to her if he loves her. And he will not oppress her when he is angry with her. [1]

Brothers and sisters, may Allaah protect us all and our children from ahlul bidah and the obstinate hizbiyyoon. Does a hizbi fear Allaah (The Most High) by distancing himself from all Mubtadi’ah? Indeed, the hizbies defend innovators and this is what we witness from the obstinate followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill) and elsewhere. They defend those who innovate in the religion of Allaah, even though they know that the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters (in the religion) and every newly invented matter (in the religion) is a bidah and every bidah is misguidance.’’

Therefore, brothers and sisters will any Salafi be pleased that the Hizbiyyoon of ‘Sunnah Marriages UK’ [The headless chicken Abu Bilal Hanif] get involved in finding husbands for their daughters and wives for their sons?! See links: http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/abu-bilal-hanif-marriage-maker-is-a-deviant-hizbi-with-the-hizbiyyoon-of-masjid-as-sunnah-so-do-you-want-him-to-find-female-hizbies-for-your-sons-and-male-hizbies-for-your-daughters/ http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/1-reminder-to-the-hizbiyyoon-deluded-abu-bilal-hanif-and-his-hizbiyyoon-friends-shaikh-rabee-has-still-not-changed-his-view-about-the-obstinate-hizbiyyoon-at-masjid-sunnah/

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said: If he (i.e. the man) is persistent upon sin, he is not to be married to, because some the pious predecessors said: ‘’He who marries his precious one (i.e. daughter) to an evil doer, then indeed he has severed her womb’’[2]

NB: Who are Abu Bilal’s (Marriage Maker) friends and allies? His friends and allies are the the hizbiyyoon of Masjid Al-Furqan (Rushlome) and the Hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill)

——————————————————————————–

[1] [Source: Kitaab Uyoonul Akhbaar. Page: 308. Vol 3-4]

[2]Source: Hukm Ash-Sharee-ah Fee Az-zawaaj Min Ash-Shee-ah. Page: 27 and 57]

[2] Shaikh Rabee’s Recent Advise to the Salafiyyoon Neither Exonerates Nor Benefits Abu Bilal Hanif-the Headless Chicken Hizbi and WhatsApp Stalker of Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill (Manchester)]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

——————————————————————————————————————

Headless Chicken-Abu Bilal Hanif (Marriage Maker)-

This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon and actively seeking to spread their shubuhaat, but ends up with nothing!

——————————————————————————————————————

Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) gave a general advise to the Salafiyyoon. However, Abu Bilal Hanif the deluded WhatsApp Stalker and stooge of the Hizbiyyoon cannot understand that it does not benefit him (a WhatsApp stalker and stooge of the hizbiyyoon of Masjid as-Sunnah and elsewhere). Shaikh Rabee’s (may Allaah preserve him) advice does not benefit the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah. So let us remind deluded Abu Bilal once again about the mockery his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah are guilty of when they cut the phone line whilst Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) was giving sincere advice to those people who wanted to abandon the deviant Masjid Committee of Masjid As-Sunnah [i.e. the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, such as Abu Shurayh Al-Libi, Abu Umaamah Al-Libi, Abu Abdillah Akram Sharghaawi and others] see here: http://safeshare.tv/w/tLftrTwJNQ

What benefit is there in Shaikh Rabee’s recent advice for deluded Abu Bilal?! Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) did not tell the Salafiyyoon to co-operate with the followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah- those who utilise Abu Bilal Hanif as their Shubuhaat WhatsApp Stalker. Indeed, it is an utter disgrace that this Abu Bilal, who is in his late 40s, allows others to play football with his intellect. Who told him that this advice of the Shaikh has anything to do with him and his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah?! Is Abu Bilal Hanif so deluded that he now utilises Shaikh Rabee’s advice to promote his deviations and deliberately turn away from the specific verdicts of the Shaikh against the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi)?!

So who is deceiving himself and deliberately seeking to depict Salafiyyah as hizbiyyah, and hizbiyyah as Salafiyyah- the followers of the Mubtadi’ah or those who accept the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah!

Who is making a mockery of himself- those who follow the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, or Abu Bilal Hanif,?! He insults his intellect by thinking that Shaikh Rabee’s advise will benefit him whilst he is a pathetic promoter of Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers?!

Who is a hizbi- those who reject the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers or those who are willing Hizbi WhatsApp Stalkers on behalf of Masjid as-Sunnah and other hizbiyyoon?!

Indeed, it is extremely sad that Abu Bilal Hanif, a man in his late 40s cannot still realize that he is a calamity upon himself. He deludes himself and denies reality, so he misleads himself, misrepresents and disowns what he knows to be true. He lies to himself and refuses to acknowledge reality. It is as if he wants to protect his mind against anxiety by diminishing awareness. This will undoubtedly produce a blind spot- a place of blocked attention and self-deception.

The likes of Abu Bilal find it hard to embrace the specific detailed evidences produced by the Salafi scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, so he desperately seeks to repress or re-interpret it. He has developed the habit to switch off, turn a blind eye or deceive himself to such an extent that it has severely limited his understanding.  This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon like a headless chicken-actively seeking to spread the shubuhaat of the followers of the Mubtadi’ah but ends up with nothing!

So who is the hizbi, the one running around like a headless chicken on behalf of the obstinate hizbiyyoon or those who abandon the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers? Abu Bilal finds it hard to refrain from portraying himself as one drowned in pathetic fallacy and a stooge of the hizbiyyoon. May Allaah guide him. Aameen

And Allaah knows best

————————————————————————————-

Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) Recommends The Student of a Murji Mubtadi

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) said: ‘He who loves the deeds of a people, good or bad, is just like the one who commits them'[1]

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah) commented saying:

He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!

And due to this, it has been reported concerning the one who wishes to be like the scholar who teaches the people good, that he will get a reward similar to that of (that Scholar).  And the one who wishes to be like the rich person who spends his wealth in the path of Allah, (then) he will receive a reward similar to that of (that rich person) in accordance to his intention.

Likewise, the opposite of this is (with regards) to the one who wishes to be like the criminal and the people of sin, (and) wishes to be their partners in sin or give support to their views and hold it to be true, (then) he is like them even if he did not commit an act similar to theirs, (but) solely (due to the fact that) he held their views to be correct and took their side.[end of quote][2]

Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) recommends Abu Suhaib Bassam- a student and staunch supporter  of the Murji Mubtadi, Ali Al-Halabi. When this Abu Suhaib entered the city of Manchester, he proceeded for Dawah with the followers of Al-Halabi Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri Al-Mubtadi and and Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani al-Mubtadi at Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill].

Abu Suhaib is well aware of the detail refutations of the Scholars against Halabi and his innovations, however he takes pride in defending Al-Halabi and openly keeping the company Al-Halabi’s staunch followers. Abu Suhaib is afflicted with a corrupt Walaa Wal Baraa in this affair of Al-Halabi, even though he portray himself as one who fights all bidah. In one of his lectures he stated that ”Every Bidah is Misguidance”; but what prevents him from openly refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi?!

Also in that same lecture, Abu Suhaib quoted the statement of Ibn Mas’ood (radiyallaahu-anhu) as follows: ”Follow and do not innovate, and hold unto the old affair for you have been sufficed.”  He (Abu Suhaib) even questioned the proponents of Bidah Hasanah, asking them whether they are stupid or stubborn for holding onto this erroneous view! However, Abu Suhaib refrains from openly denouncing Al-Halabi and his innovations, even though the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi are also from the affairs of misguidance. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated:

“If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

So we say to Abu Ibraheem Husnayn: Do you promote the staunch supporters of Mubtadi’ah and consider them to be upon the balanced path?! How can the staunch followers of Mubtadi’ah be considered as such, rather the people upon the balanced path are those who abandon the obstinate figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers. They reject the shubuhaat of the figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers at Masjid As-Sunnah (Manchester), Masjid Al-Ghurabaa (Luton), Masjid Ibn Taymiyyah (Brixton), Masjid Al-Furqan (Manchester) and other people of hizbiyyah.

Reminder To Abu Ibraaheem About What The Balnaced Path Is

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Saalim Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

It is widely known about some of the people that Al [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ] is only that which occupies the middle position between two things, and they do not call to attention the other meaning of this word, as mentioned in the Magnificent Qur’aan and the Prophetic Sunnah. [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ ]  in the Islamic legislation is that which is ‘Superior.’ [Allaah (The Most High)] said: said:

حَـٰفِظُواْ عَلَى ٱلصَّلَوَٲتِ وَٱلصَّلَوٰةِ ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ

Guard strictly (five obligatory) As-Salawaat (the prayers) especially the Salatul Wustaa (the Asr prayer) [2:238] [ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ]; meaning: the best, most excellent etc.

And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:

مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ مَا تُطۡعِمُونَ أَهۡلِيكُمۡ

[مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ ] [On the scale] of the average of that which you feed your own families” [5:89] That is: The best and most just.

And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:

وَكَذَٲلِكَ جَعَلۡنَـٰكُمۡ أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا

Thus We have made you [أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا] [2:143]

 That is: the best and most upright.

The intent behind this is to understand that [الوسطية] in the religious context is that which is ‘best’ and the ‘Justice in the Religion’—(and it is) to follow that which Allaah (The Mighty)and Magestic) has commanded and keep away   from that which He has forbidden.  As for the explanation of [الوسطية] in the religious context with a meaning other than this meaning, it is (founded upon something) ready to crumble. It is a mirage which a thirsty one considers water (i.e. an illusion). [3]

Question Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn): Can it be said that a Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi and his staunch followers are upon the middle path? Rather the scholars have established with clear proofs that Ali al-Halabi is a Murji and an extreme Mumayyi. Ali Al-Halabi innovated principles in order to accommodate innovators such as Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi into the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah. So where is the balance in Ali Al-Halabi’s Manhaj and why do you associate with his staunch supporter Abu Suhaib Bassam? Be warned against giving recommendations based on ignorance or desires! Indeed, either you are confused about Abu Suhaib’s corrupt alliance or you are like him. Ponder upon this Tazkiyah from Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi to Abu Suhaib Bassam:

Praise be to Allah, and the benediction and salutation on the Messenger of Allah on his progeny and his companions and those who follow him After that: Verily our brother in the cause of Allah, Abu Sohaib Bassam Abul Haj is from among our brothers from the salafiyyun known with us for the propagation of faith to Allah’s book and the Sunnah upon the manhaj of the salaf, refuting the deviated people of innovation. May Allah grant us the right aptitude and every virtue returns to Him.[End of Quote—original Tazkiyah in Arabic available on the net]

In the above Tazkiyah Ali al-Halabi says that Abu Suhaib refutes the people of deviation! So why has Abu Suhaib refrained from refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi after the scholars have clearly established that Ali Al-Halabi has innovated. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated: “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

Abu Ibraaheem: Akhi refrain from speaking without proof, for indeed it is a great sin. Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

And be remnded once again what Imaam Al-Barbahaari’s (rahimahullaah) stated: He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!

We ask Allaah to distance you from the company of those who defend and shelter Mubtadi’ah and grant you tawfeeq to find the balanced path and its people. Aameen.

The False Principles of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi (The Innovator)

http://salaficentre.com/2013/02/the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi-the-innovator/

 —————————————————————————————————-

[1][Source: Translated by Aboo Talhah Daawood Burbank (hafidha-hullaah), Explanation of the Creed]

[2][Source: (It-haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree; Vol: 2, page: 113-114)]

[3] Source: Al Haqeeqatus Shar-iyyah Fee Tafseeril Qur’aanil Adheem Was-Sunnatin Nabawiyyati page: 186]

[Abu Bilal Hanif (Marriage Maker) and other desperate Mancunian Hizbiyyoon]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Albaani (rahimahullaah) said:

It is not hidden from every Muslim who is acquainted with the Book, the Sunnah and that which our Salaf were upon, that the Tahazzub (Illegal partisanship) and gathering within the groups that carry different views or different methods (of Dawah) has nothing to do with Islaam; rather in many Aayaat of the Qur’aan our Lord (The Mighty and Majestic) has prohibited us from that. Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَكُونُواْ مِنَ ٱلۡمُشۡرِڪِينَ

مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ فَرَّقُواْ دِينَهُمۡ وَڪَانُواْ شِيَعً۬ا‌ۖ كُلُّ حِزۡبِۭ بِمَا لَدَيۡہِمۡ فَرِحُونَ

And be not of Al-Mushrikun (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, polytheists, idolaters, etc.). Of those who split up their religion (i.e. who left the true Islamic Monotheism), and became sects, [i.e. they invented new things in the religion (Bid’ah), and followed their vain desires], each sect rejoicing in that which is with it.” [30: 31-32] [Fataawaa Al-Muhimmah Fee Tabseeril Ummah. Page: 118]

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) said:

There is nothing in the Book or the Sunnah that allows different groups and parties; rather that has been censured in the Book and the Sunnah. Allaah (The Most High) said:

فَتَقَطَّعُوٓاْ أَمۡرَهُم بَيۡنَہُمۡ زُبُرً۬ا‌ۖ كُلُّ حِزۡبِۭ بِمَا لَدَيۡہِمۡ فَرِحُونَ

But they (men) have broken their religion among them into sects, each group rejoicing in its belief. [23:53]

And there is no doubt that these parties oppose that which Allaah has commanded. Allaah (The Most High) said:

إِنَّ هَـٰذِهِۦۤ أُمَّتُكُمۡ أُمَّةً۬ وَٲحِدَةً۬ وَأَنَا۟ رَبُّڪُمۡ فَٱعۡبُدُونِ

Truly! This, your Ummah [Sharia or religion (Islamic Monotheism)] is one religion, and I am your Lord, therefore worship Me (Alone).” [21:92] [ Fataawaa Al-Muhimmah Fee Tabseeril Ummah. Page:120]

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) said:

It is obligated on the scholars to clarify the reality. They should debate every group and give advice to all, so that they can traverse upon the path Allaah has ordained for His slaves, and the path which His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) called to. And whoever oversteps this path or remains upon obstinacy, then it is obligatory to expose him… [Fataawaa Al-Muhimmah Fee Tabseeril Ummah. Ppage: 116 (End of Quote)]

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) says:

The cause of the differing that takes place between the callers is the differing in methodologies.  And had the callers (may Allaah guide them and grant them success) traversed a singular methodology; and that is the methodology of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) – that which the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam) and his companions were upon, then these differences would not have occurred.

Therefore, it is obligatory upon all the callers to make their methodology one–upon the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam); and that their call is (carried out) for the sake of Allaah and to make the word of Allaah uppermost.  Their call should not be for the sake of desires, raising individuals or parties; rather their call should be sincerely for Allaah’s Face-making Allaah’s word uppermost; following the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) and to aid His Religion.  (So) by way of this the differing will cease. [Source: Al-Ijaabaatul Muhimmah Fil Mashaakil Al-Mulimmah (page:221-222)]

It is amazing how the Mu’mayyi’oon have been making strenuous efforts to promote their poisonous Dawah -an alliance whose players are either staunch defenders of Mubtadia or other deviants. In Manchester we find the Admin of Masjid As’Sunnah -followers of Al-Maghraawi, Maribi, Halabi-working closely with the Admin of Masjid Al-Furqaan-promoters of Al-Maghrib Institute and the books of Sayyid Qutb (books removed only after the public was warned). On the other hand, we find Luton and Brixton upon the same Manhaj-promoters of the Mubtadia Al-Halabi and Al-Maribi.

What Brings These Groups and Individuals Together

Al’Amash (rahimahullaah) said: They (Salaf) did not used to ask anything more about a person after having asked three affairs: Who he walks with, who he enters upon (I.e. visits) and who he associates with amongst the people.” [Al-Ibaanah 2/478] [Translated by Salafipublications]

Indeed, nothing else brings these people together except a strong desire to establish a cocktail of hizbiyyah aimed at sheltering some innovators and deviants in the name of Salafiyyah. So amongst them are those who defend the Mubtadi Takfeeri Al-Maghraawi; defenders of the Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi; defenders of the Ikhwaani Mubtadi Al-Maribi and defenders of the proponents of Tamyi, such as the likes of Saalim At-Taweel and even the likes of Muhammad Al-Maliki, who defends the Haddaadi innovator Yahyah Al-Hajoori! This is the latest alliance they [Luton, Brixton, Masjid Sunnah (Cheethamhill-Manchester), Masjid Al-Furqaan (Rusholme-Manchester) etc] are seeking to establish in the name of Salafiyyah-backed up by translators, such as Naveed Ayaaz of Islaam Nelson. As for Abu Bilal Hanif, he continues to disgrace himself as their stooge and pathetic WhatsApp Messenger. He transmits all their Shubuhaat and Dalaalaat. May Allaah guide him (Aameen).

 ——————————————————

To be continued In-Shaa-Allaah

Shaikh Fawzaan says: This is what they want apparently [i.e. differing and excusing one another in Issues of Aqeedah] and this is not permissible!

Question:

This questioner says: Assalaamu akaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu, some callers put forward a principle, they say that indeed it (brings about) unity: “We unite upon that which we agree and pardon each other in that which we disagree in.”

Answer:

If this agreement is (already) in Aqeedah, then yes (we can excuse each other in other issues besides Aqeedah) as differing may occur in the subsidiary issues. The Mujtahid’s (ijtihaad) is taken when he’s correct and (the ijtihad) is abandoned if he opposes what is correct. So if there is agreement on the Aqeedah and the differing is only in Fiqh and subsidiary issues then (this affair is looked at from another) an angle. [1]

However if this differing is in Aqeedah, then upon what can we agree?! We cannot agree on anything. This is what they want apparently (i.e. excuse one another in Aqeedah issues) and this is not permissible. [2]

————————————————————————————————————–

[1]http://salaficentre.com/2015/05/a-misunderstanding-regarding-the-statement-laa-inkaar-fee-masaail-al-khilaaf-there-should-be-no-repudiation-in-the-affairs-of-khilaaf-i-e-differing/

[2] http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/14191