Tag: tamyee’

[4]Does Hizbi (Abu Bilal Hanif-Marriage Maker) fear Allaah with regards to who he befriends and accompany? Be warned against falling into Abu Bilal’s Trap because he’ll give your daughters to Hizbiyyoon in Marriage- those who keep the company of Mubtadi’h and their staunch followers

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A man said to Al-Hasan [Al-Basri (rahimahullaah)]: I have a daughter and she has been sought for marriage; so to whom should I give her in marriage? He (Al-Hasan) said: Marry her to the one who fears Allaah, for he will be kind to her if he loves her. And he will not oppress her when he is angry with her. [1]

Brothers and sisters, may Allaah protect us all and our children from ahlul bidah and the obstinate hizbiyyoon. Does a hizbi fear Allaah (The Most High) by distancing himself from all Mubtadi’ah? Indeed, the hizbies defend innovators and this is what we witness from the obstinate followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill) and elsewhere. They defend those who innovate in the religion of Allaah, even though they know that the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters (in the religion) and every newly invented matter (in the religion) is a bidah and every bidah is misguidance.’’

Therefore, brothers and sisters will any Salafi be pleased that the Hizbiyyoon of ‘Sunnah Marriages UK’ [The headless chicken Abu Bilal Hanif] get involved in finding husbands for their daughters and wives for their sons?! See links: http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/abu-bilal-hanif-marriage-maker-is-a-deviant-hizbi-with-the-hizbiyyoon-of-masjid-as-sunnah-so-do-you-want-him-to-find-female-hizbies-for-your-sons-and-male-hizbies-for-your-daughters/ http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/1-reminder-to-the-hizbiyyoon-deluded-abu-bilal-hanif-and-his-hizbiyyoon-friends-shaikh-rabee-has-still-not-changed-his-view-about-the-obstinate-hizbiyyoon-at-masjid-sunnah/

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said: If he (i.e. the man) is persistent upon sin, he is not to be married to, because some the pious predecessors said: ‘’He who marries his precious one (i.e. daughter) to an evil doer, then indeed he has severed her womb’’[2]

NB: Who are Abu Bilal’s (Marriage Maker) friends and allies? His friends and allies are the the hizbiyyoon of Masjid Al-Furqan (Rushlome) and the Hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill)

——————————————————————————–

[1] [Source: Kitaab Uyoonul Akhbaar. Page: 308. Vol 3-4]

[2]Source: Hukm Ash-Sharee-ah Fee Az-zawaaj Min Ash-Shee-ah. Page: 27 and 57]

[2] Shaikh Rabee’s Recent Advise to the Salafiyyoon Neither Exonerates Nor Benefits Abu Bilal Hanif-the Headless Chicken Hizbi and WhatsApp Stalker of Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill (Manchester)]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

——————————————————————————————————————

Headless Chicken-Abu Bilal Hanif (Marriage Maker)-

This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon and actively seeking to spread their shubuhaat, but ends up with nothing!

——————————————————————————————————————

Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) gave a general advise to the Salafiyyoon. However, Abu Bilal Hanif the deluded WhatsApp Stalker and stooge of the Hizbiyyoon cannot understand that it does not benefit him (a WhatsApp stalker and stooge of the hizbiyyoon of Masjid as-Sunnah and elsewhere). Shaikh Rabee’s (may Allaah preserve him) advice does not benefit the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah. So let us remind deluded Abu Bilal once again about the mockery his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah are guilty of when they cut the phone line whilst Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) was giving sincere advice to those people who wanted to abandon the deviant Masjid Committee of Masjid As-Sunnah [i.e. the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, such as Abu Shurayh Al-Libi, Abu Umaamah Al-Libi, Abu Abdillah Akram Sharghaawi and others] see here: http://safeshare.tv/w/tLftrTwJNQ

What benefit is there in Shaikh Rabee’s recent advice for deluded Abu Bilal?! Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) did not tell the Salafiyyoon to co-operate with the followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah- those who utilise Abu Bilal Hanif as their Shubuhaat WhatsApp Stalker. Indeed, it is an utter disgrace that this Abu Bilal, who is in his late 40s, allows others to play football with his intellect. Who told him that this advice of the Shaikh has anything to do with him and his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah?! Is Abu Bilal Hanif so deluded that he now utilises Shaikh Rabee’s advice to promote his deviations and deliberately turn away from the specific verdicts of the Shaikh against the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi)?!

So who is deceiving himself and deliberately seeking to depict Salafiyyah as hizbiyyah, and hizbiyyah as Salafiyyah- the followers of the Mubtadi’ah or those who accept the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah!

Who is making a mockery of himself- those who follow the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, or Abu Bilal Hanif,?! He insults his intellect by thinking that Shaikh Rabee’s advise will benefit him whilst he is a pathetic promoter of Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers?!

Who is a hizbi- those who reject the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers or those who are willing Hizbi WhatsApp Stalkers on behalf of Masjid as-Sunnah and other hizbiyyoon?!

Indeed, it is extremely sad that Abu Bilal Hanif, a man in his late 40s cannot still realize that he is a calamity upon himself. He deludes himself and denies reality, so he misleads himself, misrepresents and disowns what he knows to be true. He lies to himself and refuses to acknowledge reality. It is as if he wants to protect his mind against anxiety by diminishing awareness. This will undoubtedly produce a blind spot- a place of blocked attention and self-deception.

The likes of Abu Bilal find it hard to embrace the specific detailed evidences produced by the Salafi scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, so he desperately seeks to repress or re-interpret it. He has developed the habit to switch off, turn a blind eye or deceive himself to such an extent that it has severely limited his understanding.  This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon like a headless chicken-actively seeking to spread the shubuhaat of the followers of the Mubtadi’ah but ends up with nothing!

So who is the hizbi, the one running around like a headless chicken on behalf of the obstinate hizbiyyoon or those who abandon the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers? Abu Bilal finds it hard to refrain from portraying himself as one drowned in pathetic fallacy and a stooge of the hizbiyyoon. May Allaah guide him. Aameen

And Allaah knows best

————————————————————————————-

Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) Recommends The Student of a Murji Mubtadi

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) said: ‘He who loves the deeds of a people, good or bad, is just like the one who commits them'[1]

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah) commented saying:

He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!

And due to this, it has been reported concerning the one who wishes to be like the scholar who teaches the people good, that he will get a reward similar to that of (that Scholar).  And the one who wishes to be like the rich person who spends his wealth in the path of Allah, (then) he will receive a reward similar to that of (that rich person) in accordance to his intention.

Likewise, the opposite of this is (with regards) to the one who wishes to be like the criminal and the people of sin, (and) wishes to be their partners in sin or give support to their views and hold it to be true, (then) he is like them even if he did not commit an act similar to theirs, (but) solely (due to the fact that) he held their views to be correct and took their side.[end of quote][2]

Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) recommends Abu Suhaib Bassam- a student and staunch supporter  of the Murji Mubtadi, Ali Al-Halabi. When this Abu Suhaib entered the city of Manchester, he proceeded for Dawah with the followers of Al-Halabi Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri Al-Mubtadi and and Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani al-Mubtadi at Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill].

Abu Suhaib is well aware of the detail refutations of the Scholars against Halabi and his innovations, however he takes pride in defending Al-Halabi and openly keeping the company Al-Halabi’s staunch followers. Abu Suhaib is afflicted with a corrupt Walaa Wal Baraa in this affair of Al-Halabi, even though he portray himself as one who fights all bidah. In one of his lectures he stated that ”Every Bidah is Misguidance”; but what prevents him from openly refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi?!

Also in that same lecture, Abu Suhaib quoted the statement of Ibn Mas’ood (radiyallaahu-anhu) as follows: ”Follow and do not innovate, and hold unto the old affair for you have been sufficed.”  He (Abu Suhaib) even questioned the proponents of Bidah Hasanah, asking them whether they are stupid or stubborn for holding onto this erroneous view! However, Abu Suhaib refrains from openly denouncing Al-Halabi and his innovations, even though the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi are also from the affairs of misguidance. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated:

“If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

So we say to Abu Ibraheem Husnayn: Do you promote the staunch supporters of Mubtadi’ah and consider them to be upon the balanced path?! How can the staunch followers of Mubtadi’ah be considered as such, rather the people upon the balanced path are those who abandon the obstinate figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers. They reject the shubuhaat of the figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers at Masjid As-Sunnah (Manchester), Masjid Al-Ghurabaa (Luton), Masjid Ibn Taymiyyah (Brixton), Masjid Al-Furqan (Manchester) and other people of hizbiyyah.

Reminder To Abu Ibraaheem About What The Balnaced Path Is

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Saalim Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

It is widely known about some of the people that Al [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ] is only that which occupies the middle position between two things, and they do not call to attention the other meaning of this word, as mentioned in the Magnificent Qur’aan and the Prophetic Sunnah. [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ ]  in the Islamic legislation is that which is ‘Superior.’ [Allaah (The Most High)] said: said:

حَـٰفِظُواْ عَلَى ٱلصَّلَوَٲتِ وَٱلصَّلَوٰةِ ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ

Guard strictly (five obligatory) As-Salawaat (the prayers) especially the Salatul Wustaa (the Asr prayer) [2:238] [ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ]; meaning: the best, most excellent etc.

And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:

مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ مَا تُطۡعِمُونَ أَهۡلِيكُمۡ

[مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ ] [On the scale] of the average of that which you feed your own families” [5:89] That is: The best and most just.

And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:

وَكَذَٲلِكَ جَعَلۡنَـٰكُمۡ أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا

Thus We have made you [أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا] [2:143]

 That is: the best and most upright.

The intent behind this is to understand that [الوسطية] in the religious context is that which is ‘best’ and the ‘Justice in the Religion’—(and it is) to follow that which Allaah (The Mighty)and Magestic) has commanded and keep away   from that which He has forbidden.  As for the explanation of [الوسطية] in the religious context with a meaning other than this meaning, it is (founded upon something) ready to crumble. It is a mirage which a thirsty one considers water (i.e. an illusion). [3]

Question Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn): Can it be said that a Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi and his staunch followers are upon the middle path? Rather the scholars have established with clear proofs that Ali al-Halabi is a Murji and an extreme Mumayyi. Ali Al-Halabi innovated principles in order to accommodate innovators such as Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi into the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah. So where is the balance in Ali Al-Halabi’s Manhaj and why do you associate with his staunch supporter Abu Suhaib Bassam? Be warned against giving recommendations based on ignorance or desires! Indeed, either you are confused about Abu Suhaib’s corrupt alliance or you are like him. Ponder upon this Tazkiyah from Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi to Abu Suhaib Bassam:

Praise be to Allah, and the benediction and salutation on the Messenger of Allah on his progeny and his companions and those who follow him After that: Verily our brother in the cause of Allah, Abu Sohaib Bassam Abul Haj is from among our brothers from the salafiyyun known with us for the propagation of faith to Allah’s book and the Sunnah upon the manhaj of the salaf, refuting the deviated people of innovation. May Allah grant us the right aptitude and every virtue returns to Him.[End of Quote—original Tazkiyah in Arabic available on the net]

In the above Tazkiyah Ali al-Halabi says that Abu Suhaib refutes the people of deviation! So why has Abu Suhaib refrained from refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi after the scholars have clearly established that Ali Al-Halabi has innovated. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated: “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

Abu Ibraaheem: Akhi refrain from speaking without proof, for indeed it is a great sin. Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

And be remnded once again what Imaam Al-Barbahaari’s (rahimahullaah) stated: He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!

We ask Allaah to distance you from the company of those who defend and shelter Mubtadi’ah and grant you tawfeeq to find the balanced path and its people. Aameen.

The False Principles of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi (The Innovator)

http://salaficentre.com/2013/02/the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi-the-innovator/

 —————————————————————————————————-

[1][Source: Translated by Aboo Talhah Daawood Burbank (hafidha-hullaah), Explanation of the Creed]

[2][Source: (It-haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree; Vol: 2, page: 113-114)]

[3] Source: Al Haqeeqatus Shar-iyyah Fee Tafseeril Qur’aanil Adheem Was-Sunnatin Nabawiyyati page: 186]

Shaikh Fawzaan says: This is what they want apparently [i.e. differing and excusing one another in Issues of Aqeedah] and this is not permissible!

Question:

This questioner says: Assalaamu akaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu, some callers put forward a principle, they say that indeed it (brings about) unity: “We unite upon that which we agree and pardon each other in that which we disagree in.”

Answer:

If this agreement is (already) in Aqeedah, then yes (we can excuse each other in other issues besides Aqeedah) as differing may occur in the subsidiary issues. The Mujtahid’s (ijtihaad) is taken when he’s correct and (the ijtihad) is abandoned if he opposes what is correct. So if there is agreement on the Aqeedah and the differing is only in Fiqh and subsidiary issues then (this affair is looked at from another) an angle. [1]

However if this differing is in Aqeedah, then upon what can we agree?! We cannot agree on anything. This is what they want apparently (i.e. excuse one another in Aqeedah issues) and this is not permissible. [2]

————————————————————————————————————–

[1]http://salaficentre.com/2015/05/a-misunderstanding-regarding-the-statement-laa-inkaar-fee-masaail-al-khilaaf-there-should-be-no-repudiation-in-the-affairs-of-khilaaf-i-e-differing/

[2] http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/14191

[5] Reminder to Didsbury Masjid Admin: Your Deviant Ikhwaani Ally Abu Eesa Niamatullah Praises Abu Ghuddah- another caller to Shirk and staunch enemy of Ahlus Sunnah!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

On Monday, August 1, 2005 Abu Eesa wrote: In the view of recent deaths and the like, wouldn’t it be nice if we remembered a few of the (many) major scholars that we’ve lost in the last few centuries? Here are a few rare pictures to give you some faces to all the names you’ve heard so much of.’’ [Included amongst Abu Eesa’s major scholars were the likes of Shaikh Abdul Fattaah Abu Ghuddah and this statement of his is still present in his blog]

Who is Shaikh Abdul Fattaah Abu Ghuddah?

Imaam Albaani (rahimahullaah) said: He is Shaikh Abdul-Fattaah Abu Ghuddah Al-Hanafi Al-Halabi; well known for his severe enmity towards the People of Sunnah and Hadeeth, especially in his land Halab, when he used to deliver the khut’bah on the Minbar of his Masjid on the Day of Juma’ah and utilized it for abuse against the people of Tawheed who were well-known as the Salafiyyeen, particularly in his land, and the Saudi people of Tawheed and other than them whom he nicknamed Al-Wahhaabiyyah in general. He proclaimed his severe enmity towards them and clearly declared them misguided with his speech: ‘’Indeed, appealing for aid and assistance through the dead besides Allaah (The Most High) and seeking deliverance and rescue of them is permissible, and it is not shirk. And whoever claims that it is shirk or kufr is a kaafir…[1]

 ——————————————————————————-

[1] Source: Sharh Al-Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah’ with the checking of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah) page: 49. The 9th edition Al-Maktabah Al-Islaami 1408AH/1988]

[3] Didsbury Masjid Admin [South Manchester]: They Invite The Soofi Muhammad Ibn Adam kawthari

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A conference in Manchester (Didsbury Mosque) in June 2006

List of invited speakers include Suhaib Hasan, Muhammad bin Adam al-Kawthari (sufi saint worshipper, gives fatwas inviting to shirk and denial of uluww of Allaah), Mufti Yusuf Sacha (Tablighi Maturidi Deobandi), Riyadh al-Haqq (Deobandi Maturidi), Awadallah al-Azhari, Kehlan al-Jaboori, Abu Eesa Niamatullah. Specimen, Specimen, Specimen, Specimen, Specimen Suhaib Hasan,, Abu Eesa Niamatullah  [1]

 

————————————————————-

[1] Source: http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/rzfwp-the-conference-of-green-lane-mosque-singers-and-ikhwanis-and-internal-politics-part-7.cfm

[2] Didsbury Masjid Admin [South Manchester]: They promote Jamal Al-Badawi [An Aqlaani (gives precedence to his intellect over the ahaadeeth and falls into philosophical rhetoric)]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Firstly: In post number one http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/1-didsbury-masjid-admin-south-manchester-who-are-their-associates/ … we saw that the Admin of Didsbury Masjid cooperates with Abu Eesa Niamatullah- an associate of the deviant Al-Maghrib Institute and a signatory of the pledge of mutual respect between deviant groups. Abu Eesa is also a close companion of Yasir Qadhi the Ikhwaani deviant. [Yasir Qadhi, see link http://www.salafis.com/tags/yasir-qadhi.cfm

Secondly: Who else is one of those people utilised by the Admin of Didsbury Masjid for Dawah?! They utilise the likes of Jamaal Al-Badawi – An Aqlaani [gives precedence to his intellect over the ahaadeeth and falls into philosophical rhetoric]. Listen to Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’s (may Allaah preserve him) clarification about the Manhaj of Jamaal Al-Badawi and Hasan at-Turaabi: http://www.learnaboutislam.co.uk/audio/abu-khadeejah/Refutation-of-Hassan-Turabi-&-Jamal-Badawi-Abu-Khadeejah-Abdul-Wahid.mp3

Finally:

Let us acquaint ourselves with a few statements of the Scholars about philosophical rhetoric

Imaam Ahmad (rahimahullaah) said: I am neither a person of philosophical rhetoric nor do I recognize philosophical rhetoric in anything. (I only recognize) that which is found in the Book of Allaah or in the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). [1]

Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee (rahimahullaah) said: [learning] knowledge of philosophical rhetoric is ignorance.

Imaam Abu Yusuf (rahimahullaah) said: [Learning] knowledge of philosophical rhetoric is ignorance and to be ignorant of philosophical rhetoric is knowledge. [2]

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

Philosophical rhetoric is like the flesh of a camel at the top of a mountain.  It is neither easy to climb the mountain nor is the flesh good enough to justify climbing, nor is the path leading to it easy to follow.[3]

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

 ————————————————————–

[1] Source: Quoted in ”An-Nahjul Aqwaa. Introduction by Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan and Shaikh Abdul Azeez Aala Shaikh. page: 126]

[2] Aqeedah Ash-Shaafi’ee. Page 87. http://al-badr.net/sub/228%5D

[3] Source: Naseehat Ahl Eemaan Fee Radd alaa Mantiq al Yunaan. page: 157]

There Are No Muslim Scholars In The West, So Be Warned Against The Deviant UK Pretenders Who Are Being Presented As Scholars By Unsuspecting Journalists

 In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The way to know a scholar is that (you) ask the people of knowledge in his era about him.  He should be well known amongst the Fuqahaa (the upright jurists) of his era and supported by what they say about his affair.  He should be well known for seeking knowledge.

Shu’bah (rahimahullaah) said:

”Take knowledge from those who are well-known (i.e. those who are well-known and established in it).”

Ibn Awn (rahimahullaah) said:

”Do not take this knowledge except from one about whom it is testified that (he acquired it) through Talab (i.e. studied or studies with the scholars).”

Imaam Maalik Ibn Anas (rahimahullaah) said: I did not give fatwa until I asked those who were more knowledgeable than me, as to whether I was competent in doing that.  I asked Rabee and Yahyah Bin Sa’eed, so they commanded me to do that. So (the one speaking to Maalik at the time) said: O father of Abdullaah! What if they prohibited you? He replied: ‘’Then I would have stopped. It is not permissible for a person to consider himself worthy of anything (i.e. teaching, giving fatwa etc) until he asks someone (from the scholars) who is more knowledgeable than him.’’ [End of quote (1)]

Al-Allaamah Ubaid Ibn Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) also stated: If the affair of a person is hidden from you–the one whose books and cassettes are famous and his fame is widespread–then ask those who are well acquainted with him and those who know about his state of affairs.  That is because neither is the Sunnah hidden nor are its people. A man’s Tazkiyah (i.e. the clear witness that he is upright upon the Sunnah) are his own actions. His Tazkiyah are his own actions that he is upon the Sunnah. It is the witness and the people mention him with it during his life and after his death. [End of quote (2)]

So just ask yourself a simple question: Who amongst the scholars of Salafiyyah has given the UK pretenders the title ‘Scholar?’ The deceitful pretenders do not have a single recommendation showing that they are upright and trustworthy, rather some of them are well known for Ikhwaanism, Qutubiyyah, Sorooriyyah, Khurooj and others are advocates of Irjaa, philosophical rhetoric and other innovations.

 ———————————————————————–

[1] Source: Al-Mu’een Li-Tawdeeh Athar Ibn Seereen Inna Haadhal Ilm Deenun’ Page 55]

[2] http://salaficentre.com/2013/12/4-greenlanes-admin-deceitful-hizbiyyoon-principles-that-can-never-be-abandoned/