Tag: tamyee’

[3] The Reality of Faisal Al-Jaasim’s Disassociation from Ihyaa Turaath!

Shaikh Badr Ibn Muhammad Al-Badr Al-Anzy stated:

A Risaalah (treatise) was sent to me by some of the brothers concerning the affair of Faizal Al-Jaasim’s disassociation (from) the group Ihyaa Turaath Al-Islaami. The statement he issued concerning his disassociation is in reality not a disassociation; rather it is ‘keeping a distance‘ (in one direction) and ‘Coming Close’ (from another direction)-being distanced from ascription to Ihyaa Turaath, but coming close (to them) with regards to companionship, giving instructions and co-operating (with them)!

And (it is) amazing that he (Faisal) acknowledges the Mukhaalafaat of Ihyaa Turaath; the hizbiyyah (they are upon); their entry into politics and adherence to their Takfeeri Shaikh, Abdur- Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq; but then he (Faisal) stated at the end of his statement that –in his view-there is no hindrance in cooperating with them!!!  Your return to the Salafi Manhaj is confirmed as you claim. Is it from the Salafi Manhaj to co-operate with innovators?

By Allaah your disassociation (from Ihyaa Turaath) is similar to the disassociation of حاي الحاي- it is only a disassociation by way of ascription and not (by way) of thought. Here is حاي الحاي – his lessons are held at Ihyaa Turaath and he praises some of its Shaikhs, and this فيصل قزار says that there are Salafi Shaikhs within (Ihyaa Turaath) and there is no hindrance in co-operating with them. For this reason- my brothers- do not rejoice (due) these (people’s) abandonment of the Jam-iyah (i.e. Ihyaa Turaath) because in reality they abandon their ascriptions to the Jam-iyah but not the thought of the Jam-iyah. [1]

مدونة مقالات

للشيخ: بدر بن محمد البدر العنزي

بشأن اعتزال فيصل قزار الجاسم جماعة أحياء التراث الإسلامي

الحمد لله رب العالمين
أُرسلت لي رسالة من بعض الأخوة
بشأن اعتزال فيصل قزار الجاسم
جماعة أحياء التراث الإسلامي
وإذا بالبيان الذي أصدره في اعتزاله ليس باعتزال في حقيقة الأمر
بل هو بُعد وقُرب!!!
بُعد عن المنصب في الجمعية
وقُرب في المصاحبة والتوجيه والتعاون!
والعجيب أنه يعترف بمخالفات الجمعية وتحزبها ودخولها في السياسة وتمسكهم في شيخ التكفيرين عبدالرحمن عبدالخالق
ثم يقول في أخر بيانه بأنه لامانع لديه من التعاون معهم!!!
يامن رجعت لمنهج السلف كما تدعي
هل التعاون مع المبتدعة من منهج السلف؟
والله اعتزال فيصل قزار مثل اعتزال حاي الحاي
اعتزال منصب فقط لا اعتزال فكر.
هذا حاي الحاي دروسه تقام في جمعية أحياء التراث ويثني على بعض مشايخه
وهذا فيصل قزار يقول الجمعية فيها مشايخ سلفيين ولا مانع من التعاون معهم.
لذلك يا إخواني لا يفرح بترك هؤلاء للجمعية لأنهم في حقيقة الأمر تركوا مناصبهم في الجمعية لا فكر الجمعية .


[1] Slightly paraphrased and abridged. See: https://albader1.wordpress.com/ (post number 30)

Greenlane’s Admin: ‘The Lasting Legacy’ Necessitates distancing oneself from all revolutionaries, admirers of khaarijites and their affiliates!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said: We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger.  We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects.  As for others, they play games and tricks.  By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth. [End of quote] http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=114620

Therefore, the affair is not merely about the Violent Khawaarij due to the present Fitnah of ISIS; rather let us see Greenlane’s Admin and Goldie take clear stances against all those who either carry the ideas of the khawaarij, or shelter people who carry the ideology of the khawaarij, or praise people who propagate the ideology of the khawaarij, such as the organization Ihyaa Turaath- those who shelter some speakers who advocate demonstrations and removal of the Muslim Rulers; admirers of the Takfeeri Sayyid Qutb; admirers of the Ikhwaani Mubtadi Yusuf Al-Qaradaawi and the revolutionary Mubtadi Abdur-Rahmaan  Abdul Khaaliq etc

Let us see Greenlane’s Admin and Goldie renounce the people of khurooj amongst Ihyaa Turaath. Let us see Goldie renounce the Takfeeri Muhammad Al-Maghraawi and those other deviants who advocate demonstrations in the Muslim lands, such as Yusuf Al-Qaradaawi and those admirers of Sayyid Qutb (the figurehead, guide and mentor of the contemporary Khawaarij terrorists).

Greenlane’s Admin shelters Goldie and Goldie Keeps the Company of the followers of the Takfeeri Al-Maghraawi [@ Masjid Sunnah (Cheethamhill Manchester)] 

See following articles about Al-Maghraawi: Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi [Salafipublications.com]  Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1   Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2  Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

Greenlane’s Admin Shelters Goldie and Goldie praises the misguided Ikhwaani revolutionary Al-Qaradaawi

Goldie stated about Al-Qaradaawi: ”From the contemporary scholars and he is a scholar, is the Shaikh Yusuf Al-Qaradaawi…”

It is well-known to the people of Sunnah- scholars, students and the common people-that Yusuf Al-Qaradaawi is an evil deviant, who calls to demonstrations and protests. Likewise, he has many other affairs of misguidance. [see articles at salafipublications.com: [Readings in Qaradawism Part 1: article Id:NDV160001]  [Readings in Qaradawism Part 2: article Id: NDV160002] [Readings in Qaradawism Part 3: article Id: NDV 160003] [Readings in Qaradawism part 4: article Id: NDV 160004]

It is not surprising that Goldie (a man of bidah) admires Al-Qaradaawi (a figurehead of Ikhwaanism and Bidah); rather his admiration of Al-Qaradaawi further manifests another reality, and it is the fact that the hizbi organization Ihyaa Turaath (which is an affiliate of Goldie’s employers @Greenlane) are also admirers of the Ikhwaani Innovator Al-Qaradaawi. They (Ihyaa Turaath) stated: “We thank you for your sweet-smelling letter and we hope for an increase in communication between us regarding the treaty with the Jews that was published in the magazine Al-Muslimoon and the response of Shaykh Yoosuf al-Qaradaawee that was published in the magazine Al-Mujtama’ . So we request (that you) refer (back) to them….  “ Speaker:  the magazine Source: Al-Furqaan Pages: 59, pg. 65 Date: 1995. [1]

This agreement between Goldie and Ihyaa Turaath in their admiration of an Ikhwaani Deviant reminds us of the hadeeth: Aisha (radiyallaahu-anhaa) said, I heard the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) saying, ‘’Souls are like recruited troops; those who are of like qualities are inclined to each other, but those who have dissimilar qualities differ.’’ [Saheeh Bukhaari Vol 4. Hadeeth Number 3336. Darusallam]

Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajar (rahimahullaah) stated one of the meanings of this hadeeth in Fat-hul Baari that Al-Khattaabi (rahimahullaah) said: This may indicate to mean similarity in good and evil, righteousness or corruption– the good one amongst the people  is inclined towards one similar to him, and the evil one is similarly inclined towards the one similar to him.  Souls have an affinity with others in accordance with the nature in which they were created, good or evil. They will agree if their natures are similar, otherwise they will be at loggerheads…  [See Fat-hul Baari for further details]


Greenlane’s Admin Co-operates with Adnaan Abdul Qaadir of Ihyaa Turaath and Adnaan is an Admirer of the Takfeeri Sayyid Qutb!

Adnaan Abdul-Qaadir (of Ihyaa Turaath) said:

“As for Sayyid Qutb, then indeed he was passionate about presenting the goals and basic principles of every soorah before beginning in it’s tafseer in his book Fee Thilaalil-Qur’aan?” Source: Mukhtasar min nathril-maasi wad-darari fee Turuqil-bahthi ‘an muqaasidis-Suwar  Pages: 6-7 Date: 2004 [2]

NB: Adnaan Abdul-Qaadir visits Greenlane and Goldie translates his lectures.


Other speakers of Ihyaa Turaath upon the ideology of khurooj

Waa’il Al-Hasaawee

Waa’il Al-Hasaawee (another speaker of Ihyaa Turaath) calls for the removal of the Rulers; he said: “But the question that we do not find an answer to is regarding the reason for the weakness of the Arab and Islaamic peoples and their lack of ability to change their present situation on their own, and their helplessness to remove those rulers who are perched on their chests” Source: Al-Furqaan magazine (the magazine of Jam’iyyah Ihyaa’ at-Turaath) Number: 235, pg. 40 Date: 24/3/2003 [3]

Naadhim Sultaan

He said: “We say: it is wrong, O people of Tunisia and those who traverse upon their way! Don’t go to the American Embassy (to protest)! Go to these palaces that are in them the (Muslim) leaders and presidents” [4] [End of Quote]

Therefore, the  affair is not merely about refuting ISIS and other violent kharijites; rather the affair is about taking a clear stance against all those whom the scholars have refuted and warned against due to being upon the ideology of the kharijites, such as Muhammad Al-Maghraawi- those who call to demonstrations and protects, such as the deviant Ikhwaani Innovator Yusuf Al-Qaradaawi; or those organizations (i.e. Ihyaa Turaath) that shelter speakers who call to demonstrations and khurooj against the rulers and those who call the Ummah to Sayyid Qutb etc

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

Indeed, the khawaarij of old were called ‘Al-Harooriyyah’ because they started their bidah of rebellion against the Muslim rulers at a place called Haroora in Koofah. They were also called ‘Ahlu An-Nahrawaan’ (The people of Nahrawaan) because Ali (radiyallaahu-anhu) fought them at that place. They are divided into different groups: The Ibaadiyyah-followers of Abdullaah Bin Ibaad and the Al-Azaariqah-the followers of Naafi Bin Azraq and others. [For further details see: Sharh Hadeethu Jibreel of Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah: Page 319].

Likewise, amongst these groups are the ‘Khawaarij Qa-adiyyah’ and they are the most dangerous amongst the khawaarij. The Qa-adiyyah are those who do not go out in person to fight and cause corruption, rather they sit behind and convince the people to do so. Imaam Abu Daawud (rahimahullaah) reported in Masaa-il Ahmad [page: 271] from Abdullaah Ibn Muhammad As-Suhaib that he said: ‘The sitters amongst the khawaarij (i.e. the Qa-adiyyah–those who instigate the fighting but do not actually participate) are the filthiest of the khawaarij.

Therefore, the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah are not fooled by Greenlane’s Admin and Goldie.  It is not enough for an organization or a masjid to distance itself from ISIS, Nusrah and others, yet it co-operates with Ihyaa Turaath-an organization that shelters speakers who call to Sayyid Qutb, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq and other revolutionaries.  Rather, Greenlane even allows Goldie to praise Al-Qaradaawi-an affiliate of the Deviant Muslim Brotherhood Sect of Egypt and a caller to protests against some of the Muslim Rulers.

See link about Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq: http://www.thenoblequran.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=NDV&subsecID=NDV09&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

The Salafi students of Knowledge in the various Maraakiz of salafiyyah warn against all these deviants with clear evidences based on the clarifications of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah. Therefore, do not be deceived by anyone who warns against ISIS, but at the same time he refuses to distance himself from other individuals, who carry Takfeeri ideas, or organizations that shelter speakers, who admire Sayyid Qutb, Al-Qaradaawi, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq and others similar to them. So if Grenlane’s Admin and Goldie are truthful in their stance against all the khawarij and not only ISIS etc, then let them distance themselves from Ihyaa Turaath and their affiliates, and all other innovators. Imaam Ibn Rajab (rahimahullaah) said:

[  أما أهل البدع والضلالة ومن تشبه بالعلماء وليس منهم فيجوز بيان جهلهم وإظهار عيوبهم تحذيرا من الاقتداء بهم ]

”As for the people of innovation and misguidance and those who imitate the scholars, but are not from them, then it is permissible to clarify their ignorance and manifest their deficiencies, so as to warn (others) from following them.” [الفرق بين النصيحة والتعبير : page 36]


References 1, 2, 3 & 4, see link:




Greenlane’s Admin: Shaikh Uthaymeen and six other scholars unveil the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor; why do you hide truth & aggrandize status of those who defend him?!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Uthaymeen refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) unveils the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi






Shaikh Gudiyaan (rahimahullaah) refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi





Shaikh Zayd Bin Haadi (rahimahullaah) refutes the deviations of Adnaan Ar’oor Al-Mubtadi






Shaikh Ubayd Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him)

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

[a] Greenlane’s Admin: A mention of the Names of harmful deviants must not be abandoned merely based on the assumption that their followers will become more attached to them

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Firstly: We remind Greenlane’s Admin (Allies of the deviants of Ihyaa Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute etc): Whenever our scholars see the need to mention the names of harmful deviants, we will transmit their verdicts. It will not be abandoned merely based on the assumption that such action will make their followers more attached to them.


Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him):

When to mention names of harmful deviants

See Link


Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan [may Allaah preserve him] was asked about some of those students with a [ورع بارد – an inappropriate or unjustified ‘apprehensive fear’ (1)]- that when when they hear the sincere advisers- among the students or scholars- warning against bidah, the people of bidah and the paths that lead to bidah, and making mention of the reality of what they [i.e. people of bidah] are upon and then refuting them; likewise, [these advisers] would mention some of the names of [those being refuted]- even if they have passed away- due to the trial the people are subjected to through them; and this [warning] carried out for the purpose of defending the Religion, to unveil the deception of those who mix truth with falsehood and those who speak ill of [the religion] in the midst of the people and and thus spread the splitting and differing in the Ummah- they [i.e. those with this inappropriate or unjustified apprehensive fear] would claim that speaking against the innovators and mentioning some of their names is from the forbidden types of backbiting.

Answer: The principle related to this [affair] is about warning against mistakes and deviation, after identifying it as such. If the affair requires making known the name of an individual among the obstinate opponents so that beguilement does not occur through their [affair] – especially those individuals with deviated views or deviation in behavior and methodology, and they are well known among the people and the people have a good opinion of them- then there is no harm in mentioning them by their names and their methodology warned against.

The scholars carry out research in the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and then mention the narrators and the reproach stated against them. This is not [done] for the purpose of personal [criticism]; rather it is [done] for the purpose to giving advice to the Ummah in case they come across affairs from these individuals that are harmful to the Religion or lies against the Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam].

Therefore, first and foremost, this principle is about warning against mistakes. However, the one who committed such mistake(s) is not to be mentioned if that would either lead to greater harm or if there is no benefit in mentioning him. However, if the affair requires that his name be made known for the purpose of warning the people against his methodology, then this is [considered] to be sincerity to Allaah, His Book, His Messenger, to the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk, especially if he [i.e. the one warned against] is active within the people and they have a good opinion of him, and acquire his books and tapes. Then there has to be clarification and the people must be warned, because [employing] silence will be harmful to the people. His affair has to be unveiled, but not for the purpose of defamation or following one’s desires [in that]; rather it has to be [done] for the purpose of sincerity to Allaah, His Book, His Messenger, the leaders of the Muslims and their common people. [2]


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah)

Question: This question states: What is your view of the one who warns against bidah and innovators in general but does not hold that names are to be mentioned?

Answer: When something happened, the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) used to say, ‘’what is wrong with a people (who did or say such and such)?!’’ This is correct; but is this said about the leaders of misguidance–those who call the people to affairs of misguidance and the people are put to trial through them? Is this said about them? No; these ones must be mentioned. They must be made known and they must be known, so that the people are cautious about them. As for us keeping quiet about them and saying, ‘’No, we do not mention their names- we neither say Sayyid Qutb nor Hasan al-Banna, neither such and such person nor such and such person”; then with respect to the one who utters this statement, for example: If we were to warn against the people of bidah, then who will be able to say that it is other than these people (i.e. differentiate them from others and that) these are the leaders of ahlul bidah. [slightly paraphrased] [3]

[1] NB: The word [ورع  ] translated as ‘apprehensive fear’ was taken from one of Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq’s [hafidhahullaah] articles.

[2] Source: Al-Ajwibah Al Mufeedah; page 162 Question number: 66 Slightly paraphrased]

[3] Listen to audio here:

Finally: We remind Greenlane’s Admin (Allies of the deviants of Ihyaa Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute and other personalities who carry erroneous views etc): Whenever our scholars see the need to mention the names of harmful deviants, we will transmit their verdicts. It will not be abandoned merely based on the assumption that such action will make their followers more attached to them.

Greenlane’s Admin –This affair is a differing in Manhaj and not Fiqh; Unity can only be based on sound creed and the one who knows is a proof against the one who does not know!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadee (rahimahullaah) said:

Al-Khilaaf Fiqhiy: It is when the evidence can carry this (meaning) or that (meaning), such as the Hadeeth:”When one of you wakes up from his sleep, he must not put his hand in a utensil till he has washed it three times, for he does not know where his hand was.” The scholars have differed in this (affair); amongst them are those who say that the water becomes impure and amongst them are those who say that it is forbidden (to put one’s hand in the water) but (the water) does not become impure and this affair is a legislated act of worship; and amongst them are those who say that it is Makrooh (disliked to put the one’s hand in the water  but not forbidden), because he (i.e. the person) is upon certainty that his hand is in a state of purity.  So the likes of this (affair) is Ikhtilaaf fiqhiy and similar to it (also is whether) the Basmallaah is to be uttered loudly (during the prayer).

Al-Khilaaf Manhajiy:  As for Al-khilaaf Manhajiy, it is a problematic disease such as the methodology of Ikhwaan Al-Mufliseen; for their Manhaj is entry into elections, houses of parliaments and party Multiplicity.  This is considered to be Ikhtilaaf Manhajiy because it is in opposition to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wa-alaa-aalihi-wasallam)…… [End of quote…See: Ghaaratul Ash-ritah: page: 40-41: Vol 1]

Pay close attention to this affair so that you are not deceived- in your religious affairs- by the deceitful false claimants to Salafiyyah. The Maraakiz of Salafiyyah do not have a working relationship with any organization or group that mixes Sunnah and bidah. However, Greenlane’s Admin co-operates with organizations and groups that mix Sunnah and Bidah, such as Ihyaa Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute. Greenlane’s Admin seeks to hide its reality from some of those unsuspecting Mashaayikh who are considered to be upon the Sunnah-and only Allaah knows our real state of affairs- whilst maintaining their ties with some of the obstinate people of bidah. This is a Manhaj shared between Ihyaa Turaath and Greenlane’s Admin.

Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) said: Ihyaa Turaath mixes the religion with politics or bidah with Sunnah. The Shaikh also says: Their call is a mixture. They call to those who are considered to be from ahlul bidah. http://www.sahab.net/forums/?showtopic=117024


Ihyaa Turaath

See here: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220 – all about the Aqeedah and Manhaj of Ihyaa Turaath-The associates of Greenlane’s Admin.

After acquainting yourself with Ihyaa Turaath’s deviations in Aqeedah and Manhaj (in the above link) then ask yourself the following questions:

[1] Is it possible for any claimant to Salafiyyah to co-operate with Ihyaa Turaath after being well aware of their clear affairs of bidah and misguidance in Aqeedah and Manhaj?!

[2] Is it possible for any claimant to Salafiyyah to keep quiet about the clear and grave deviations of Ihyaa Turaath [in Aqeedah and Manhaj] after being well aware of them?!

[3] Is it possible for any claimant to Salafi to show enmity towards those who unveil the calamities of Ihyaa Turaath?!

[4] Is it possible for any claimant to Salafiyyah to deliberately ignore the deviations of Ihyaa Turaath [in Aqeedah and Manhaj] and openly declares it working relationship with them?!

[5] Is it possible for any claimant to Salafiyyah to unite with Ihyaa Turaath after being well aware of their clear deviations in Aqeedah and Manhaj?!


Al-Allaamah Saaleh al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

As long as the Aqeedah (creed) is shaky and blemished, the Muslims cannot be united. It is not possible to unite the one upon Bidah with the one upon the Sunnah, ABADAN.  It is not possible to unite the person of corrupt Aqeedah (creed) with a person of sound aqeedah even though they share the same name (i.e. they are both called Muslims). The Muslims have to be united upon Tawheed, upon the correct Aqeedah, upon the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (Muhammad-sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). The Muslims have to come together; they have to unite and follow that which emanates from that bond and unity, as long as this does not depart from obedience to Allaah and His Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam).  And due to that, the Messenger (sallal-laahu alayhi wasallam) said:  ”Allaah is pleased for you with three things: ”that you worship Him (alone) and not to associate anything with Him; and that you (all) hold unto the Rope of Allaah and not to be divided; and that you give sincere advise to the one placed in charge over your affairs (i.e. the Muslim Ruler).”

As for the one who calls to the unity of the Muslims even though they differ in their Aqeedah, indeed, this is impossible. The one who wants to unite the Muslims even though they are upon divergent beliefs, even though they are upon shaky beliefs, this is inconceivable. (It is) like the one who attempts to bring together water and fire or a beast and a fish. This can never be possible because a beast lives on land and a fish lives in the sea…

[End of quote: Source: Excerpt from a lecture delivered by Sheikh Saaleh al Fawzaan at Masjid At-Tawheed in Taa-if. Title of lecture: At Tahdeer Minal Furqati Wal Ikhtilaaf]

Therefore, do not be deceived by Greenlane’s Declaration of a conference in which there some of those Mashaayikh who are considered to be upon the Sunnah-and only Allaah knows our real state of affairs-; rather a sensible person should look to the reality and not merely what is apparent. Clinging to the Sunnah does not allow the Sunni to form alliances with some of those considered to be from Ahlus Sunnah-and only Allaah knows our real state of affairs- whilst maintaining ties with the obstinate deviants of Ihyaa Turaath, al-Maghrib Institute and others. This is why when Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about attendance at Islamic conferences (or gatherings) of knowledge that are under the supervision of the Jam-iyyaat (i.e. Islamic organizations of illegal partisanship) but also attended by Mashaayikh who are considered to be upon the Sunnah….So the Shaikh said that the brothers are aware of his speech concerning all these Jam-iyyaat. These Jam-iyyaat seek to promote and establish their goals through some of the Mashaa-yikh, so Shaikh said that he does not see that one should go to them.  Some of the Mashaayikh are unaware of the pursuit of these Jam-iyyaat through them; so one should not go to them. http://www.sahab.net/forums/?showtopic=130647

Shaikh Ubaid Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him said:”The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow).”  http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/2-an-eye-opener-for-the-seeker-of-truth-alallaamah-ubaid-bin-abdillaah-al-jaabiri-answers/

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah



Question to Greenlane’s Admin-Did your associate [Abdur-Raheem McCarthy!] inform you of the so-called imprisoned scholars?!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Abdur-Raheem McCarthy is an associate of Greenalan’s Admin.  He participated in their conference ‘The Journey of Love – Summer Conference 2014’

Abdur-Raheem claims that the Salafis hide the commendation (Tadeel) given to certain scholars who were imprisoned and promote the Jarh against them.  He uttered this slanderous, deceitful, false and sinful statement in the presence of Saeed Rageah, who sat like a silent devil whilst listening attentively.

However, Abdur-Raheem–the deceitful ally of Greenlane’s Admin– neither mentioned the names of those so called scholars nor did he give details of the Tadeel for them or the Jarh against them.  Indeed, it is very unlikely that a close hizbi associate of Greenlane’s Admin will ever be honest and brave enough to mention the names of such so-called scholars who were imprisoned! That is because the only so called imprisoned scholars known to Ahlus Sunnah- who were imprisoned in Saudi and else where- were the Ikhwaani political activists, the callers to Khurooj, demonstrations, the Qutubiyyah etc. Therefore, who are the so called scholars intended by Abdur-Raheem?! This question has still not being answered because there are great affairs of manhaj attached to it. The Salafiyyoon are foremost in spreading the virtues of the people of Sunnah and Salafiyyah and the foremost in transmitting the refutations of the scholars against the people of bidah and hizbiyyah. So as usual-like any other hizbi-Abdur-Raheem deliberately failed to speak the truth, rather he deliberately utilized the pillars of hizbiyyah stated by Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi (rahimahullaah), and they are: Lies, Deception and Concealment.

Abdur-Raheem lied because he falsely accused the Salafiyyoon. He sought to deceive his audience by claiming that those imprisoned were scholars and he deliberately concealed the reasons that led to the imprisonment of such deviants; rather he even accused the Salafiyyoon of hiding their so-called virtues. Indeed, it is not surprising that Greenlane’s Admin is associated with Abdur-Raheeem because what else is to be expected of a people who deliberately shelter [Abu Usaamah-the obstinate khadh-dhaab, man of bidah and defender of the Mubtadia Maribi, Halabi etc]- and co-operate with singers, Ikhwaanis, and the deviants of Ihyaa Turaath, Al-Maghrib Institute etc.


Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

I [Abu Mu-aawiyyah (Abdullaah al-Gambi) asked Ustaadh Abdul Waahid Abu Khadeejah (may Allaah preserve him) about the state of affairs of Abdur-Raheem McCarthy Al-Amreekee after I came across his mixing haqq with Baatil, his exaggerations and defence of the people of hizbiyyah such as the likes of Abu Muslimah, Abu Usaamah etc; so he (Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah) said to me: ‘’Narrate from me that I heard Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadee (may Allaah preserve him) saying: ‘’I warn against Abdur-Raheem. [end of quote]’’

We ask Allaah for truthfulness.  Aameen

Greenlane’s Masjid Admin Co-operates with an organization that is from the deviated sect of Ikhwaan Al-Muslimeen!

Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) responded to the one who considers some of those affiliated to ihyaa turaath as people of virtue, knowledge and sound religion….Listen to audio here:



Points from Shaikh Ubiad’s Response:

*The utterer of this statement is overwhelmed by the proofs…..

*This statement is one of his falsehoods…

*The principle with Ahlul Ilm (i.e. the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah) is that the one who allies with ahlul bidah- neither bringing them to account nor aiding those who confront them, then he is from them even if he-in the apparent-is one who shows righteousness and acts upon some of the sunnah. This does not free him from falling into bidah….

*We have spoken against Ihyaa Turaath in many places…..

*Ihyaa Turaath is among (or within) the Ikhwaan Al-Muslimeen sect…..


Therefore, the Salafi is not diverted from the fact that Grenlane seeks to mix haqq with baatil by inviting those considered to be upon the Sunnah, whilst maintaining its ties with ahlul bidah. This is the manhaj of Greenlane’s Admin, whereas salafiyyah does not accommodate ahlul bidah. See articles…

The Basis of the Differing Between Greenlane’s admin and SP


Conferences organized by hizbiyyoon and attended by Mashaayikh who are considered to be upon the Sunnah