Tag: tamyee’

A brief clarification from Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah about Saalim At-Taweel’s lie against Shaikh Ubaid

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

وصلني كلام لسالم الطويل نشر في موقع كل السلفيين خلاصته ان الشيخ العلامة عبيد حفظه الله فوضني بمسائل الطلاق والخلع وما اشبه ذلك وهذا والله كذب وافتراء على الشيخ حفظه الله ونقول: سبحانك هذا بهتان عظيم وانما نصحنا وحثنا على الرجوع في هذه المسائل وغيرها الى اهل العلم وهذا ما حصل منا وفعلناه والحمد لله اولا واخرا والعاقبة للمتقين ولا عدوان الا على الظالمين
كتبه أبو خديجة
المكتبة السلفية ببرمنغهام بريطانيا


A statement of Saalim At-Taweel’s- disseminated in the (website) Kullu Salafiyyeen- (1) has reached me that the Shaikh Al-Allaamah Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) delegated me (i.e. put me in charge) in the affairs of divorce and khula and what is similar to that. This-by Allaah-is a lie and fabrication against the Shaikh (may Allaah preserve him) and we say: ‘’Glory be to You (O Allah) this is a great lie.’’ Rather we were advised and encouraged to refer back to the people of knowledge in these affairs (of divorce and khula) and other than them. This is what has occurred from us and it is what we have done (i.e. we refer these affairs and other than them to the scholars) and all praise is due to Allaah in the beginning to the end of (all affairs) and the (blessed) end is for the Muttaqoon, and there is no enmity except against the oppressors.

Written by: Abu Khadeejah

Al-Maktabah As-Salafiyyah Birmingham (Britain)

End of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’s (may Allaah preserve him) clarification.

The above Arabic clarification was forwarded to us via WhatsApp by Ustaadh Abu Tasneem -Mus’haf Al-Banghaali (May Allaah preserve him)


Reminder from Al-Markazus Salafi

[1] The website Kullu Salafiyyeen is under the supervision of the Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi. In-Shaa-Allaah we will make known some of the calamities in this website as pointed out by Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him). We seek Allaah’s protection from all evil and from the plots of the people of deviation. Aameen

[A] Some Destructive False Principles and Calamities of Abdul Maalik Ar-Ramadaani-An ally of Brixton and Luton, and Al-Halabi (Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi)

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ


Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”Abdul Maalik has become confounded, disorderly and erratic.”

Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”Abdul Maalik is with Al-Halabi and Al-Maribi.”[a]

Shaikh Abdullaah al-Bukhaari (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”Abdul Maalik is sick and deviated.” [b]


False Principle Number One

Making it a condition that there has to be Ijmaa (consensus) before Tabdee is accepted

Abdul Maalik Ar-Ramadaani (may Allaah guide him) stated about the Tabdee against Eed Shareefee (may Allaah guide him): [العلماء ما أجمعوا على تبديعه حتي يقال هذا الكلام ] ”The scholars do not hold a consensus on the Tabdee against him (i.e. they do not hold a consensus that he is an innovator) in order for you to speak with this statement (i.e. saying that he is an innovator).”’ [End of quote] [1]

There is no basis for this view of Abdul Maalik. The scholars of Ahlus Sunnah have not made it a condition in the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel that there has to be consensus before a person is declared an innovator; rather a single aalim is enough. Al-Haafidh Ibn Salaah (rahimahullaaj) said:  ”They (i.e. scholars) differed as to whether Jarh and Tadeel is affirmed by way of the statement of one person or there that has to be a second person? Amongst them are those who say: It is not established (or affirmed) except by way of two people just as (the case) in Jarh Wat-Tadeel in giving witnesses (or testimonies). And from them are those to say:- and this is the correct statement chosen by Al-Haafidh AbuBakr Al-Khateeb and other than him-It is established (or affirmed) by the statement of one person because numbers is not a condition for the acceptance of a khabar. It is not a condition for disparaging or commending its narrator as opposed to giving witness (or testimony).” End of quote [2]

So where is the so called Ijmaa claimed by Abdul Maalik (may Allaah guide him) in this affair?! Consider the statement of Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) when he stated: ”Abdul Maalik has become confounded, disorderly and erratic.” The Shaikh also said: ”At present he is a follower of Ali Halabi and he (i.e. Abdul Maalik) is not to be referred to.” [3] Rather Abdul Maalik (may Allaah guide him) stated: [أنا من المتأثرين بعلي حسن االحلبي ومشهور حسن آل سلمان] ”I am from those influenced by Ali Hasan Al-Halabi and Mash-hoor Hasan Aala Salmaan.” [4] He also says that he is in agreement with Ali Al-Halabi in what Al-Halabi (Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi) has written in his depraved book titled Manhajus Salafi [5]

To be continued….In-Shaa-Allaah



[a] http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2014/11/22/1-the-haal-of-abdul-malik-ar-ramadaani/


[1] See 9 in the Pdf on this link: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=127155

[2] Muqaddimah Ibn Salaah. Page: 98-99]

[3] http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2014/11/22/1-the-haal-of-abdul-malik-ar-ramadaani/

[4] http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2014/11/22/2-the-haal-of-abdul-malik-ar-ramadaani/

[5] http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2014/11/23/3-the-haal-of-abdul-malik-ar-ramadaani-shaikh-abdullaah-al-bukhaari-clarifies/

See other rebuttals of this false principle propagated

by Abdul-Maalik, Al-Halabi and Al-Maribi and their obstinate followers









Summarized benefits: Shaikh Ubaid says: Saalim At-Taweel is a Miskeen; Misguided and lost one!

Listen to audio here:


Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) comments on Saalim At-Taweel’s statement that At-Tahazzub (illegal partisanship) is present in the Nufoos of all the people and even Asabiyyah (zealous partisanship) was present within the Sahaabah….


Shaikh Ubaid stated:

*He has known the utterer of this statement for nearly 21 years and he is from Kuwait. …

*He used to be with the (salafiyyoon) and then he complied with what deviated him…

*If he wished he would have mentioned his name…

The statement  that At-tahazzub (illegal partisanship) is present in all the people is incorrect because Ahlus Sunnah are the Hizbullaah (The party of Allaah)-they do not come together except based on the Book of Allaah, the Sunnah of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) and the understanding of the Salaf; rather At-Tahazzub (illegal partisanship) is found with the innovators. For instance you find that sometimes a man is one who intermingles—sometimes he goes with Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen; sometimes with the Tableeghees and sometimes with other deviated groups regardless of the differing in the religion (i.e. blameworthy differing in Aqeedah and Manhaj)….

The sahaabah are not Ahzaab [i.e. divergent parties or groups]; rather they are Al-Muhaajiroon (i.e. the believers who migrated from Makkah and joined the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) in Madeenah] and Al-Ansaar (i.e. those believers in Madeenah who welcomed the Immigrants]…..

This statement which was uttered by this man-a Miskeen; misguided and lost one- is evidence against the people of illegal partisanship and the illegal partisans are Mubtadia. They do not come together except based on what they desire…..


Excuse us for this summary due to lack of time. Perhaps brothers can work on the full translation and share it. Jazaakumullaahu khayran. May Allaah (The Most High) guide Saalim At-Taweel and his companions (Ruhayli, Halabi etc) or protect us from their falsehood. Aameen.


Jarh Wat-Tadeel is specified to the narrators of hadeeth—A deception among the deceptions of Iblees

Shaikh Ubaid (may Allaah preserve him) says:

Indeed, the scholars disparaged men with what they deserved of disparagement and they (i.e. those disparaged) were not narrators of (hadeeth). And from that (was the disparagement against) Jahm Ibn Safwaan, Amr Al-Jaahiz and many other than them. Refer back to Siyar A’laam An-Nubulaa and other than it among the books of Jarh Wat-Taweel (and) you will know that this (claim that Jarh Wat-Tadeel is specified to the narrators of hadeeth) is a deception among the deceptions of Iblees-from the deceptions of shaytaan. [slightly paraphrased..see link: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=147003 ]

Masjid Furqan’s Admin and Islam/Nelson: Do you not see this deviant Associated with Naveed Ayaz at Madeenah.con?!

Shadeed Muhammad an associate of Naveed Ayaz at Madeenah.con



Reminder to the hizbiyyoon of Islam/Nelson and Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin

Imaam Sadi (rahimahullaah) said:

Regardless of what you many receive of praise and respect from the people, they judge the people by their associates. Therefore, it is befitting that a person takes pride in accompanying the best of the people and beware of the evil ones. A righteous companion is like a seller of musk; he either gives you some or you get a good smell from him. And the evil companion is like the blower of the bellows, he either burns you or you receive a bad smell from him. And Allaah knows best. [End of quote Source: Noorul Basaa-ir Wal-Albaab Fee Ahkaamil Ibaadaat Wal-Mu-aamalaat Wal-Huqooq Wal-Aadaab: page: 66]

Reader: The Maraakiz and Masaajid of Salafiyyah take great care regarding this affair of companionship; but the hizbiyyoon within Masjid Al-Furqan’s Admin and Islam/Nelson do not give much importance to this affair. Indeed, if they truly gave importance to this affair of companionship, they would not have co-operated with Naveed Ayaz until he frees himself from the likes of Shadeed Muhammad and dodgy characters of  Madeenah.con. This is not Salafiyyah; rather it is an alliance upon falsehood and hizbiyyah.

We seek Allaah’s protection, that we do not persist upon falsehood after its clarification. Aameen

Reasons for persistence upon falsehood after its clarification

Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari–Reasons For Persistence Upon Falsehood


[3] Greenlane’s Admin—[Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah; Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah & Allies of Naveed Ayaz [IslamNelson/Madeenah.con)]

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] state on their website as follows: ”GLMCC has excellent contacts with illustrious Scholars throughout the world, especially with Saudi Arabia.”

It is very clear to every Salafi that this Admin shelters and co-operates with individuals and organizations from Ahlul Bidah. This is something established with absolute certainty due to what is clearly witnessed by every Salafi Masjid and Markaz. However, the hizbiyyoon will do whatever is within their capability to flout the sound principles of Ahlus Sunnah in order to conceal their deviations. So you will hear them confusing the people with the claim: ”We have contact with the scholars”; however the attendance of scholars at a Masjid, Markaz or organization of hizbiyyah does not alter its reality. So we’ll suffice ourselves with the following information, which In-Shaa-Allaah will shed light on this affair and expose the deceit of the hizbiyyoon.

[1] http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/1-an-eye-opener-for-the-seeker-of-truth-al-allaamah-ubaid-bin-abdillaah-al-jaabiri-answers/

[2] http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/2-an-eye-opener-for-the-seeker-of-truth-alallaamah-ubaid-bin-abdillaah-al-jaabiri-answers/

[3] http://salaficentre.com/2012/05/shaikh-rabee-on-al-jarh-wa-tadeel-criticism-praise-2/


[1]Greenlane’s Admin—[Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah; Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah & Allies of Naveed Ayaz [IslamNelson/Madeenah.con)]

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم


Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said:

”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”


Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] state on their website as follows: ”GLMCC is committed in providing a service to the community in accordance to the teachings and strict adherence to the Quran and authentic Sunnah with the understanding of the Khulafa Rashideen and Salaf-us-Salih.” [End of Quote]

A Reminder before we briefly shed light on this blatant lie and destructive Plot Against the Pure Salafi Manhaj

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) stated in Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah [the 120th Mas-alah] They (People of the Pre-Islamic era of ignorance) claimed to follow the Salaf (righteous predecessors), while they clearly opposed and contradicted them.”  Shaikh Saaleh al Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

The general (people) among the Jews and the Christians, and the people of misguidance among those who attribute themselves to Islaam claim to follow those believers who preceded them. So the Jews claim that they follow Moosaa (alyahis-salaam) and those who believed in him; the Christians claim that they follow the Messiah (alayhis-salaam) and those who believed in him, and the people of misguidance of this Ummah claim that they follow the Salaf of this Ummah- the Sahaabah, the Taa’bi’een and their followers- and that what they are upon is the way of the Salaf.

It is not that the claim of everyone who claims to be upon the Madhab of the Salaf or upon the methodology of the Salaf is a sound claim, until he makes apparent what he is upon (regarding the) Methodology of the Salaf. So if that conforms to (the Methodology of the Salaf), then he is upon the Methodology of the Salaf; and if it is in opposition, then he is not upon the Methodology of the Salaf, even if he makes that claim.

Every deviated party at present claims to be upon the way of the Salaf, but they are not upon the methodology of the Salaf because the statement of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) regarding the precise (definition) of the way of the Salaf: ‘those upon that which I and my companions are upon’, is not applicable to them.  This is what it (means) to be upon the methodology of the Salaf. As for the one who is in opposition to this, then he is not upon the methodology of the Salaf, even if he claims that.   The Claim is not what is taken into consideration; rather the reality is what is taken into consideration.  Those who claim Salafiyyah are many, but they must make apparent what they are upon (with regards to the) Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh. If that is in conformity, then it is truth, and if in opposition, they are not upon the Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh.   Likewise, there are those who attribute themselves to the Madhabs of the Four Imaams, whilst being in opposition to the Imaams in Aqeedah; so their ascription is not correct because they oppose (the Imaams) in the most important of affairs and that is Aqeedah. [1] [End of Quote]

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] claims to be establishing the understanding of the Khulafaa and the Salaf; but the reality is that the Khulafaa and the Salaf neither worked with the people of Bidah nor sheltered those who openly defend figureheads of Bidah. This Admin is an open ally of Ihya Turaath (an organization of Bidah, whose speakers propagate various deviant methodologies]; Al-Maghrib Institute, whose deviation is clear to all the Salafiyyoon-Scholars, students of knowledge and the rest of the Salafiyyoon.

Likewise, this Admin is still sheltering Goldie [Abu Usaamah (the man of bidah)], who is well known to defend three contemporary figureheads of bidah and misguidance [Ali Halabi, Abul Hasan Al-Maribi and Muhammad Al-Maghraawi]. Therefore, is it from the Methodology of  the Khulafaa and the Salaf to co-operate with the people of Bidah or shelter those who defend them! Far removed is the Methodology of the Salaf from this satanic and destructive methodology. Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said: ”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”  [2]

Ihyaa Turaath: 

See link http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220&srow=21&erow=40

Ali Halabi:

See Links



Abul Hasan Al-Maribi:

See Link

Verdicts of the scholars against Abul Hasan Al-Maribi Al-Mubtadi [An Ally of Masjid As-Sunnah]

Muhammad Al-Maghraawi:

See Article: Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi [Salafipublications.com]

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

Abu Usaamah:



To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah


[1] Abridged and slightly paraphrased..see Sharh- Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah of Sheikh Fawzaan (Page: 295-296)]

[2]Taareekh Dimashq (6/263)

[1] The Reality of [Masjid Al-Furqaan’s Admin (Rusholme Manchester)]- Allies of Goldie Abu Usamah

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy




Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) said that Al-Hasan (al-Basree) said, ‘The wise man does not argue or seek to overcome with stratagem rather he propagates his wisdom.  If it is accepted he praises Allah and if it is rejected he praises Allah'[1]

Sheikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (hafidhahullaah) commented on the above statement saying: Concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree that Hasan al-Basree said: ‘The wise man does not argue or seek to overcome with stratagem….’

Al-Hasan Al-Basree:  He is Al-Hasan Ibnu Abil Hasan Al-Basree the well-known Imaam from amongst the Taaýbiýeen. He said:

‘The wise man’, that is the one who possesses wisdom, and wisdom is to place something in its (proper) place.  Likewise, the wise one means the one with understanding.   Therefore, two meanings are intended by Al-Hakeem (the wise one).  The first intended meaning is one who places the affairs in their (proper) place.  And it is also intended to mean the one who has understanding, because wisdom is understanding and knowledge of what is intended by Allah and His Messenger (i.e. the understanding of the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger).

He (i.e. the wise one) ‘does not argue’.  He does not debate (with) a fruitless debate that is devoid of benefit.

‘And he (i.e. the wise one) does not seek to overcome with stratagem’.  He does not seek to overcome the people of falsehood with stratagem and to make them submit.  ‘His wisdom’, that is he propagates his knowledge and if accepted he praises Allah.  This is what is sought after.  And if it (i.e. his knowledge/wisdom) is not accepted, he is absolved of his responsibility and the proof is conveyed.

And concerning the statement, ‘He (i.e. the wise one) praises Allah’; because he established and conveyed the proof, and fulfilled that which is required of him, and the guiding of the hearts is in the hands of Allah (Glorified and Exalted Be He). [1] [End of quote]

So let this be the first reminder for the Admin of Masjid Al-Furqaan! The Salafiyyoon in the UK never employ the methodology you are upon—the methodology of concealment and mixing Haqq with Baatil. Your companions are well-known, such as the likes of Abu Usamah, Saeed Rageah and other hizbiyyoon; whilst you seek to hide your reality. Do you think that you can hide the fact that you are sheltering a man of bidah (i.e. Abu Usaamah), who attacks Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) and defends the innovators [Maribi (Ikhwaani); Halabi (Murji) and Maghraawi (Takfeeri)?] As for the Salafiyyoon, they do not hide their reality from anyone-neither from the Mashaayikh of Salafiyyah nor from the people of bidah and hizbiyyah.

”The Prophet (sallal laahu alayhi-sallam) was clear with everyone regarding his call. When he arrived in Madeenah -at that vicinity of Masjid Quba (i.e. which he later built as the first Masjid), he disseminated the call with clarity and purity; so it made the hypocrites conceal themselves and they did not receive it except by manifesting Islaam, whilst surely hiding what they hid (i.e. disbelief in their hearts). This is likewise the habit of the people of falsehood; they do not make apparent what they (truly) believe. As for the people of clarity, they are people who openly proclaim (what they truly believe); so beware of the people who hide.” [3]

Obviously, we do not mean that  Masjid Al-Furqaan’s Admin are Munaafiqoon in belief; however the intent here is that they have not made apparent what they are upon in reality; rather they deliberately hide their reality, whilst allied to a man of Bidah (Abu Usaamah), but seek to utilize Mashaayikh considered to be upon the Sunnah.

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah


[1] Explanation of The Creed, translated by Aboo Talhah Dawood Burbank. Page: 99]

[2] Source: It-haaful Qaaree Bitta’liuqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree. (Vol 2. Page: 265-266)]

[3][Wudooh Al-Manhaj As-Salafi. Page 13]


Advice to the one who speaks ill of the people of knowledge—Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan

Question to Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him)

(Do you have) an advice for the one who speaks ill of the people of knowledge–those who establish refutation against the one who opposes the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam)?


It is (obligatory) upon him to repent to Allaah (The Might and Majestic) because he dislikes the truth.. Refutation against the people of falsehood is the truth. Clarifying the mistake of those who commit mistakes in knowledge is the truth. Clarification is obligatory. This (person) wants to conceal. This (person) wants to conceal knowledge, so it is (obligatory) upon him to repent and seek Allaah’s Forgiveness.


source:   http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143994  ]